Sentences with phrase «safe chemicals act»

One prong of his efforts is support of a strong Safe Chemicals Act.

Hopefully it will help propel Senator Frank Lautenberg's «Safe Chemicals Act,» requiring manufacturers to provide information about the chemicals they are putting into their products instead of assuming they're safe until proven otherwise.

Jeffrey's horizons probably extend significantly beyond what the sponsors of the Safe Chemicals Act hope to achieve.

Joe also works to achieve comprehensive reform of chemicals policy in California and in the United States, which involves intensive study of the REACH legislation in the European Union, the proposed U.S. Kid's Safe Chemicals Act of 2008 and the California Green Chemistry Initiative.

The ambitious Safe Chemicals Act, unveiled last month in the U.S. Senate, would require all industrial chemicals to be proved safe, creating a strong incentive for the development of less harmful alternatives.

The House Toxic Chemicals Safety Act of 2010 and the Senate Safe Chemicals Act of 2010 would require manufacturers to prove that existing and new chemicals meet specific safety criteria.

This morning, the Safe Chemicals Act, long awaited legislation to reform the nation's outdated chemicals law, The Toxic Substances Control Act, was introduced in Congress.

The potentially good news is that new legislation called the Safe Chemicals Act of 2010 was recently introduced by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D - NJ) on April 15.

My «Safe Chemicals Act» will breathe new life into a long - dead statute by empowering EPA to get tough on toxic chemicals.

I asked her if this meant that NO ONE had ever asked these questions before: — What is J&J's stance on the Kid Safe Chemical Act?

I wanted to understand their stance on the Kid Safe Chemical Act and the possible adverse affects of long term exposure to the multitude of chemicals in our personal care products.

Not exact matches

Recent changes to California Proposition 65 — also called the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act — that go into effect in August 2018 will require beverage companies to call out specific chemical names in addition to a warning symbol.

This work resulted in passage of the historic Food Safety Modernization Act, reforms to the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) review process and passage of the Toxic Substances Control Act, which made important improvements to the nation's chemicals management laws.

California's Prop 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act requires companies to place a warning label on any product they sell within California if it exceeds the level that the State has established as risk - free for a list of over eight hundred chemicals.

According to California's regulations under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (commonly referred to as «Prop 65», which is significantly stricter than the FDA on many levels), there is a «Safe Harbor» list of two classes of chemicals: those that cause reproductive toxicity and those that are considered carcinogens.

However, the chemical included acting as a cleansing component or preservative determines whether the wipe is safe to use on your baby or not.

Companies have long known about this chemical's ability to act like a hormone and they have always hidden behind the fact their specific product contains levels considered safe.

The NYLCV counts passage of the Community Risk and Resiliency Act as a major success this year, but is disappointed that lawmakers failed to act on the Child Safe Products Act, which would have regulated and phased out toxic chemicals in children's producAct as a major success this year, but is disappointed that lawmakers failed to act on the Child Safe Products Act, which would have regulated and phased out toxic chemicals in children's producact on the Child Safe Products Act, which would have regulated and phased out toxic chemicals in children's producAct, which would have regulated and phased out toxic chemicals in children's products.

The 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act does not require chemicals to be registered or proven safe before use.

That's in part because the identity of the chemicals used by the gas industry for drilling and fracturing are protected as trade secrets, and because the EPA, based on an exemption passed under the 2005 Energy Policy Act, does not have authority to investigate the fracturing process under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

The U.S. Food Quality Protection Act and amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act are passed, mandating that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) develop a new chemical screening program to help identify endocrine disruptors.

Leading energy industry analysts believe that in whatever energy bill Congress passes next, there will be both a new federal requirement on frack chemical disclosure and an amendment to assure that fracking is regulated by the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).

A divided three - judge panel of the court eviscerated the critical «Safe Alternatives» program that Congress adopted in the 1990 Clean Air Act to ensure the health and environmental safety of chemicals that replace chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ozone - depleting chemicals in air conditioning, refrigeration, and many other applications.

KEY ACHIEVEMENTS • Acted as an active member of the team that headed a clean drive performed for the Earth Day in 2010 • Wrote a booklet on the safe use of hazardous chemicals especially around children