Sentences with phrase «same as another reviewer»

Same as another reviewer who gave it top marks, this is my first time in using powdered vanilla.

Not exact matches

However, that same reviewer considers as a premise: «The assumption of materialism is fundamental to science» — a philosophical position rather close to Dawkins's own.
I liked having the vegetables in the same pan as the fish for a short amount of time (versus the other reviewers who cooked separately for longer).
One reviewer mentioned adding a smidgen of salt — I was thinking the same thing as I was eating them.
I had the same experience as another reviewer.
I made these scones a few days ago and like other reviewers mine to much longer to cook, more like 20 minutes, and didn't have the same smooth look as those pictured above but followed the recipe EXACTLY.
Thank you to previous reviewers that said this book is the same as the newest book... just with the original cover!
While we were eating I was thinking the same thing as the other reviewer — that I could have easily added strips of carrot, red peppers, frozen peas, etc..
One reviewer compares the handle as the same feeling as her BOB stroller.
We didn't have the same issue as some other reviewers with one of the bars being in the way.
This month, we found the same diagram on posters on the London Underground, advertising Antiphon, the new album from Midlake — described by one reviewer as an «impeccably realised meld of bucolic 70s folk and radio - friendly soft rock».
Reviewer Erin Dolan of the Institute for Discovery Education in Science at the University of Texas, Austin, wrote that «[m] any studies and multiple meta - analyses... have shown that students in online courses realize the same, if not better, outcomes as compared to students in face - to - face courses.
And 57 percent said the same pressure drove them to report unexpected findings as expected, in the interest of telling a more compelling story — some noting that editors and reviewers wanted them to do it.
In addition to the external conditions that can impact reviews, the reviewers themselves don't necessarily have the same background and deep knowledge of a subfield as the authors, and yet all they have to evaluate the work on is what's written on the page.
A layperson doesn't need the same level of precision as a colleague, or a reviewer.
Any reviewer generating subpar reviews, or exhibiting questionable motives for reviewing, is subject to the same editorial scrutiny as on any journal.»
Same experience as some of the other reviewers.
A few reviewers found the material a bit too dated, but this adaptation of Terence Rattigan's 1952 play of the same name by Terence Davies (Distant Voices, Still Lives) drew mostly raves, especially for Rachel Weisz's powerful performance as a woman whose life is torn apart when she cheats on her older husband (Simon Russell Beale) with a young war veteran (Tom Hiddleston).
Basically, without going into too much detail, many reviewers criticised this turn - based strategy game for not being able to tell what the enemy will do considering they move at the exact same time as you.
This reviewer gives Dunkirk the same score as The Fate of the Furious, a lower score than xXx: Return of Xander Cage and only half a star more than Zoolander 2... Hmmm methinks this is an opportunistic click - bait.
According to reviewers, Horizon also gets many of the same things right as where RDR excelled back in the day.
Sure, as a film I have to criticise it for that, but at the same time, I was laughing and appreciating everything Richard Curtis did with the material, putting me in an uncomfortable position as a reviewer.
It's the same as replacing the yardstick, moving the goalposts, or sending in a different movie reviewer.
Nowadays, academic book reviews either stodgily summarize the book, then close with a few half - hearted compliments designed to ingratiate the reviewer with the author or, if not that, then take the opportunity as an occasion to denounce the author as a reactionary while writing a two - page, undocumented treatise on the same subject.
Reviewers selected by Education Department officials have been ceaselessly bombarded through the media with clear signals as to which states those same officials think should win.
Paull's tale certainly dips into the fantastical, but the extreme concepts of the novel, such as the fertility police and the hive mind, are all true to bee behavior, and our reviewer promises, «you will never look at the activity in your flower garden the same way again.»
TKAM fans will likely ask the same question as BookPage reviewer Alison Hood when reading this book — Do we really need to know Ms. Lee's innermost thoughts; isn't it enough that she wrote a worthy book that continues to inspire?
So any book that has gained Awesome Indies approval is of the same quality as a mainstream book, there aren't a lot of AI approved books around, (unfortunately) and the authors are likely to be the professional ones, so it would be good to see reviewers make one exception here and accept AI accredited books for review.
They compare it to yet another title, «Quick - witted and fast - paced, this debut mystery should be a hit with Gone Girl fans,» as does the Associated Press reviewer, «The unlikable protagonist with a biting personality and outrageous actions, but who is fascinating at the same time, has never been more popular.
Reach us to get hold of all assignment worries as our writers know what Canadian reviewers want and help you in achieving the same too.
This means that to teens, Booktubers are seen in the same league as the New York Times reviewers.
Getting a book accepted by a book reviewer or a big bargain newsletter like BookBub can be as tough as getting an agent or a contract with the Big Five and you have to deal with the same kind of rejection.
(This is not the same as the «Vine» reviewer program, which is by invitation only.)
1) authors that have the same target audience as you and 2) book reviewers / bloggers / bookstagramers that post about books within your genre.
«Another way that worked for me was to use Goodreads to track reviewers of books that have the same trope or branding as mine (romances with a Greek setting or a Greek alpha male).
These book reviewers will read your book and place a review on their site, as well as pasting the same review on Amazon.
The WIFI disabling is actually a great thing, it is the same as the Aura feature that many reviewers knocked.
As in, could it be that Amazon has written algorithms that function based on an assumption that authors who only receive positive reviews (especially from the same reviewer over time), must be paying for those reviews?
The explanation seems to be that they are using some arbitrary factors such as two reviewers posting reviews from the same IP address (hello... family members ma do this) or using gift cards or posting reviews the same day they buy the book (some of are fast readers you know).
At the same time the national reviewers were employees of companies that were either owned by the media conglomerates that owned the publishing imprints or were so dependent on the advertising revenue from those companies that they might as well have been.
[Same as # 2, but from reviewers I trust to be good judges of quality, but not necessarily to have tastes compatible with mine... a set that includes every human being I call a friend except for those 3 in the # 2 group, plus everyone in the post rotation here at MGC and a significant fraction of the regular commenters at ATH.]
by Anne R. Allen Most complaints about authors by agents and editors as well as reviewers can be boiled down to the same offense.
Theses reviewers are novices — working on their own, on the same level as self - published authors.
Dana — I think a lot of authors don't realize a book reviewer needs to be queried the same way as an agent.
Reviews said many of the same things reviewers said about the Purina brand such as healthy looking coat, energy levels and weight maintenance, but almost every single one of them mentioned that their dogs absolutely loved this food.
At the same time, the card's customer service and payment portals aren't as revered, both getting two opposable thumbs down from a number of reviewers.
As gamers, we need to understand that reviewers are still human and bound by the same psychological «flaws» as we havAs gamers, we need to understand that reviewers are still human and bound by the same psychological «flaws» as we havas we have.
Lol The truth of the matter is, Polygon, like many sites, have different reviewers giving different opinion and not all of them think alike or feel the same as you or another person.
But at the same time, given that so many reviewers will give out 8's and 9's to games that are not anywhere near as well crafted as this game, a 10 certainly can't be questioned too hard.
As many other critics and reviewers are pointing out, Ubisoft are currently developing the same game over and over again with tweaks depending on the setting.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z