Sentences with phrase «same principle right»

Same principle right but you could measure progress on the Bullworker device?

Not exact matches

They are grounded in the same principles of natural right and natural law that informed our nation's Founding» principles that the conservative movement exists to protect.

And yet, if same - sex marriage is to be truly equal to natural marriage in the eyes of society and the law, then all the rights and privileges of marriage — including those involving the procreation and rearing of children — must in principle belong to both kinds of marriage, irrespective of the motives impelling a couple toward marriage or whether, once married, they exercise these rights and privileges.

For she may recognize small groups of Christians which develop independently of the territorial principle as Christian communities with the same institutional stability and rights that have so far been accorded only to the parishes.

Here, too, the principle applies that one can drive either on the right or on the left but not on both sides at the same time; we must make a choice.

Much the same problem arises when Arkes argues that certain principles of the Bill of Rights essential to the idea of law could have been applied to the states even though the Bill of Rights was clearly intended only to bind the federal government.

And one also arrives (surprisingly) in the same way at certain universal principles of right and wrong.

The best short summary of the traditional, natural law understanding of conscience was given by Thomas Aquinas when he said that the core principles of the moral law are the same for all «both as to rectitude and as to knowledge» — in other words, that they are not only right for all but known to all.

In precisely the same way, the justices could press counsel to get clear on the principled lines of a judgment that would confer the right to marriage on couples of the same - sex, while barring the extension of marriage to all of these other ensembles, who will be in the courts before long, demanding to know why they too are not eligible for the same constitutional rights.

Well, on one level the same principles of analysis and evaluation apply right..?

But by asserting that flora and fauna» perhaps even geysers and other geographical phenomena» have «rights,» the movement degrades liberal principles arising from the «Laws of Nature and of Nature's God» in the same way that wild inflation devalues the worth of currency.

In principle, anybody with the right equipment could follow the same procedure and arrive at the same results (allowing for normal variation), but for better or worse, modern scientific experiments require expertise and equipment that is not accessible to the layman.

Although it was claimed in the press that the Second Circuit's opinion was more moderate because it did not posit a «right to die,» both decisions reach the same result from the same principle.

Thornton goes on to say, «In the sermon of 1750 Jonathan Mayhew declared the Christian principles of government in the faith of which Washington, ordained by God, won liberty for America, not less for England, and ultimately for the world.3 And quite self - consciously, Thornton tied in the American Revolution with the earlier English Puritan Revolution when he stated, «The name of Hugh Peter reminds us that New England shared in English Revolution of 1640; sent preachers and soldiers, aid and comfort to Cromwell; gave an asylum to the tyrannicides, Whalley, Goffe, and Dixwell; reaffirmed the same maxims of liberty in the Revolution of 1688, and stood right on the record for the third revolution of 1776.

The idea, in short, is that the same principle that suggests Christian students should be allowed to form groups with particular identities also means that Vanderbilt has a right to corporately discriminate against student groups at odds with its values

The driver is the club that is being used below and at right, but the same principles apply to everything up to the short irons.

But IPOB's right to «self - determination» has pushed others» right to the same principle: in an Igbo quit order and ultra-dangerous anti-Igbo song in Hausa, reportedly circulating all over the North!

«Today's Supreme Court decision guaranteeing the right of same — sex couples to marry is a resounding victory for the principle of equal protection under the law,» said Queens Borough President Melinda Katz.

I commend the Court for their objectivity, principle and courage and believe all right - thinking Nigerians should do the same.

This is the same principle that explains why your finger, when held out right in front of you, appears to jump from side to side when you alternate left - eye and right - eye views.

This is one of the best Muscle Building Programs on the market, shares many of the same principles I am sharing here, and includes many other ways to keep you healthy and balanced in order to build muscle the right eway.

Under the same principle, is it right for me to acquire the rights to Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead and make it pro-Communism?

(10) The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (hereinafter ICESCR) has stayed in principle with the same definition with some additional key - points such as «sense of one's dignity» and «enabling effective participation in a free society».

Now you're not obligated to buy the DVD player even though you have a right to buy it; this is the same principle at work with call options.

People who are taking a principled stance based in authentic concern would not, IMO, turn right around and engage in the same behavior.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral The same principle can also be applied to modern GCM, where they get the right answer from the wrong parameter.

The Same principle keeps frost off the car windows in an open carport, while a car parked in the driveway right behind the one under the carport on a clear, quiet night gets frosted windows.

Therefore, if a victim of discrimination took two years to find another job, based on the new human rights principles, a judge could award her two years» wages, and her legal fees, whereas that same individual may previously only have been entitled to a few months» pay.

79 According to recital 3 in the preamble to Directive 2003/109, the directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised, inter alia, by the Charter which, according to the first subparagraph of Article 6 (1) TEU, is to have the same legal value as the Treaties.

The ECJ confirmed once again that the ECHR «does not constitute, as long as the European Union has not acceded to it, a legal instrument which has been formally incorporated into EU law», even though Article 6 (3) TEU confirms that fundamental rights recognised by the ECHR constitute general principles of EU law and Article 52 (3) requires that ECHR - corresponding rights in the Charter are given the same meaning and scope as those laid down by the ECHR (para. 45).

The collective redress regimes around the world do not have to be identical but if they are designed to protect the same substantive and procedural rights of class members and are based on some of the same fundamental principles, it is more likely that class action judgments from one jurisdiction will be enforceable in another jurisdiction.

«I think Justice Hugo Black was right to say that First Amendment rights «must be accorded to the ideas we hate or sooner or later they will be denied to the ideas we cherish»; and the same is true of academic freedom principles, flowing both from the First Amendment rights of public university employees and from their tenure contracts and professional norms.

Different private and public, individual and collective, interests have to be balanced and harmonised in a transparent and accountable manner, especially when security and data - protection principles need to be implemented to protect citizens and citizens» rights at the same time.

Neither the policies nor legal principles giving rise to the claims for framing the rights are the same.

As the Constitutional Court has held in its acts more than once, this constitutional principle means the innate human right to be treated equally with others and it consolidates formal equality of all persons, it obliges one to legally assess the same facts in the same manner and prohibits any arbitrary assessment of the essentially the same facts in a varied manner, it does not allow discrimination of persons or granting them any privileges.

On the other hand, the same obligations arising out of the resolutions rendered the alleged infringement of the applicant's Convention rights attributable to the UN and thus, per the «Monetary Gold principle», inadmissible ratione personae before the Court.

Professional secrecy is a principle of fundamental justice within the meaning of s. 7, and is also a civil right of supreme importance in the Canadian justice system; professional secrecy must remain as close to absolute as possible, and courts must adopt stringent standards to protect same.

Whether one refers to natural justice, procedural fairness, due process, the right or opportunity to be heard, the principle of contradiction (le principe de la contradiction) or the right to equal treatment, the underlying conception of fairness is the same.

This wording incorporates two important Community law principles which are explained further in the same judgment: «It is settled case law that in the absence of Community rules governing the matter it is for the domestic legal system of each member state to... lay down the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding rights which individuals derive from Community law, provided, however, that such rules are not less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (the principle of equivalence) and do not render virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law (the principle of effectiveness).»

Likewise the (non) possibility for individuals to challenge regulations before the CJEU, the right of action (and rule of law) principle can not circumvene the Treaties: the issue is that the CJEU stated that judicial review on CFPS is a matter «within» the sphere of EU Treaties, so that MS (and EU Institutions) can not take action which may impact on them by using «outside» procedures; the rationale is the same used in other cases: if the matter is covered by EU law, absence of a specific rule in EU law does not enable MS (or the Institutions) to act: in the Advice on the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction, the mere indirect effect of the Convention of the 44/2001 Regulation was considered sufficient to make the matter fall «wholly» within EU competence, thus depriving the MS of the power to act.

Seriously, why should the Treaty provision ruling out CJEU jurisdiction on CFSP be taken to rule out ECtHR jurisdiction on the same issue, when the Treaty is silent on that point, refers frequently to the ECHR, human rights and the rule of law and provides expressly for ECHR accession, and when the exclusion of ECtHR jurisdiction is anathema to the basic principles of international human rights law?

There is nothing within the law society's materials that prevents a member from amending a Statement of Principles to append or modify the contents to also affirm a commitment to s. 2 (b) expression rights around those same pPrinciples to append or modify the contents to also affirm a commitment to s. 2 (b) expression rights around those same principlesprinciples.

By the same token, it doesn't make sense to attempt to enact laws that violate fundamental human rights principles, particularly when it should be clear that such laws will be ruled unconstitutional.

The effect of the finding that the non-extinguishment principle has no operation in the common law is that many tenures, in addition to those specified in the NTA, extinguish native title rights and interests permanently, and that this extinguishment has a cumulative effect as new tenures are created over the same land.

Protecting the rights of the child — and respecting the human rights of Indigenous Australians — one and the same approach The complex issues being tackled and the proposed measures to be taken in the Northern Territory raise a host of fundamental human rights principles.

For the same reasons, in order to give effect to human rights principles, back door or de facto extinguishment which, according to the Commonwealth's submissions, is not true extinguishment, rather the evidentiary impossibility of establishing the fact of native title, should be rejected.

The same interpretative principles apply more generally to require the construction of particular statutory provisions said to have extinguishing and other effects upon native title rights and interests consistently with international human rights principles.

To allow Indigenous sea rights to be relegated to the same legal status as recreational fishermen would be to hold to an outdated and defective doctrine of mare nullius, wholly inconsistent with contemporary international rules and principles.

The principle of equality requires that Indigenous rights in land be protected to the same extent as non-Indigenous rights.

I was a «bonus mom» (or step mom) not a foster or an adoptive mom but the many of the principles are the same for all three categories; You come into the child's life partway through, not form a bond right from the getgo.