Sentences with phrase «sarty snopes»

Some of the articles in the fact - check section are from leading fact - checking sites like Snopes and PolitFact, as well as recognizable news organizations such as the BBC.

Representatives for the Sacred Stone Camp, one of the primary encampments for Dakota Access Pipeline protesters, told Snopes that it is not the source of the post, though the group appreciates the gesture.

The Morton County Sheriff's Department is not using Facebook check - ins to monitor Standing Rock protesters, a public information officer told Snopes on Monday.

Overall impact: No, that didn't actually happen (see the Snopes link), and sure, the election is in the history books.

The company has taken a number of steps to try to stamp out fake news, including setting up a process whereby it takes fact - checking and verification efforts from third - party outlets like Politifact and Snopes, and shows users when a particular story is being questioned or has been debunked.

Snopes, for example, which has been fact - checking dubious Internet stories for over two decades, was dismissed by some as a «far - left group,» as was fellow verification site Politifact.

As the fact - checking site Snopes wrote in 2016, the illegitimate child story was a resurfacing of a 1992 story that had disappeared after it was reported that a DNA test failed to establish Clinton as Williams» father.

The bill contains no religious exemption, so it is true that some Christian books that address the issue of homosexuality could be banned from being sold, but as The Federalist notes, «It is virtually impossible that California will immediately attempt to ban the sale of the Bible itself» (though they disputed Snopes» claim that the idea is «demonstrably and clearly false.»)

Perhaps you should check with Snopes — http://www.snopes.

Fact - checking site Snopes was quick to point out that this is yet another phony story about the deathbed conversion of an unbeliever.

In Faulkner's story «Barn Burning» the boy Sarty Snopes makes a difficult and costly decision to oppose the unjust acts of his father.

Sugarkube and PP, look it up on Snopes, you morons.

Just search Snopes Obama Ring, they have hi - res photos which confirm it's nothing but a continuing s pattern.

And feel free to show me where on snopes anything I said has been «debunked».

From there, a group of fact - checkers — from groups like Snopes, ABC News, the Poynter Institute — will determine if the story is, in - fact, untrue.

Snopes took on the rumor, which has been circulating off and on for a while, and it's pretty easy to dismantle.

The Babylon Bee was reported by the fact - checking website Snopes earlier this month over an article entitled «Did CNN Purchase an Industrial - Sized Washing Machine to Spin News?».

Appearing somewhat sympathetic to the Babylon Bee, Snopes said: «Although it should have been obvious that the Babylon Bee piece was just a spoof of the ongoing political brouhaha over alleged news media «bias» and «fake news,» some readers missed that aspect of the article and interpreted it literally.

Snopes confirms it.

The best summary of this legend is on Snopes; look for the phrase «survived his childhood unexploded.»

But if people who argue refuse to use snopes on the internet, those people are dumb.

When I want to track down the authenticity of a Web site, I go to Snopes.

Snopes has debunked this.

Updated again: A friend pointed out this report on Snopes.

A couple of links claiming the opposite do show up, but they're well down from skeptical articles from the likes of Snopes, CNN and the Obama campaign itself.

Obama could have veto'd the deal (per snopes), nobody else had that power.

Snopes says that no Uranium was sent to Russia.

Snopes country, if there are any Faulkner fans out there.

Facebook says it has modified the algorithm since then and has announced plans for Snopes, Factcheck.org, ABC News and PolitiFact to help weed out obviously false articles.

The authors encouraged the continued development of «alerting systems» for debunking misinformation such as Snopes.

DeVigal often consults AllSides, FactCheck.org and Snopes for a fuller picture of what's true or false, fact or opinion.

I don't know if you consider snopes a valid resource, but this page seems to have some good, balanced info: http://www.snopes.com/food/warnings/apples.asp

This has been debunked by multiple outlets (including Snopes), however, and seems to be nothing more than a few internet trolls looking for attention.

This fake information site even has its own Snopes page.

The first thing that comes to mind when talking about crap detection is sites like Snopes and FactCheck.org, which you use can use to quickly check if something is fact or fiction.

The popular online resource Snopes is a one - stop shop to fact - check internet rumors.

Challenge students to deduce whether a story is true, a scam or an urban legend, using scenarios featured in TruthorFiction, Hoax Busters and Snopes.

Snopes offers clickable links to the most common or most recent legends and a search engine for the rest.

Snopes Have you received the e-mail warning about men outside malls spraying women with ether in the guise of a perfume sampling?

Christopher DeWan has published more than forty short stories in journals including A cappella Zoo, Bartleby Snopes, Jersey Devil Press, JMWW, Juked, Necessary Fiction, Passages North, and wigleaf.

His writing appears in Bartleby Snopes, Grey Sparrow Journal, Atticus Review, and others.

Snopes called this number multiple times to confirm this intent.

Interestingly enough, i think its worth mentioning that the owner of snopes website that wrote and posted this article sits on the board of directors for the animal poison control hotline, which charges $ 35 to give information to pet owners who call in when their pet has ingested something that might be toxic and didn't think it was worth mentioning and therefore didn't disclose this at the end of the article which seems they should have done so because it apoears there would be some conflict there.

* Snopes site gives the following information: http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/cocoamulch.asp * Theobromine is in all chocolate, especially dark or baker's chocolate which is toxic to dogs.

According to reports from Snopes, 52 out of 211 animals that came through the shelter that day were specifically brought by their guardians to be surrendered.

But no: «Snopes debunks the stuffing out of both theories and explains that Miyamoto picked «Kong» from «King Kong» (but not King Kong, legally speaking) and «Donkey» to «convey a sense of stubbornness.»»

God knows well meaning friends unintentionally bombard me with emails that never would have been sent had the sender paid a quick visit to Snopes.

(Here's a Snopes fake news «survival guide.»)

On his blog, Bloom pointed to a great Oct. 18 piece on the climate article by Alex Kasprak for Snopes, the invaluable (and overworked) truth detector for web content.

[Inserted Oct. 31 Kasprak's Snopes article got to bedrock, finding that the passage derives from a caption in a March, 1912, Popular Mechanics article on the «Remarkable Weather of 1911.