For instance, the change in MAP - R or MAP - M scores for a student at the beginning of the second and third grades could be compared to that student's school peers (equivalent to your average
scale score comparison if I understand correctly), district peers, and national peers to evaluate the rate of academic growth.
Not exact matches
In the vaccine
comparison experiment, lung lesion
scores for histopathology were graded for individual animals on a
scale of 0 to 4 where 0 — 2 represented degree of cellular infiltration and 3 — 4 represented the degree of bronchiolar epithelial cell necrosis and airway cellular debris (figure 2A).
If a publication assigned a
score to the review, it is listed below (converted to a 100 - point
scale if necessary for purposes of
comparison); otherwise, we did not attempt to assign
scores to reviews that did not have them.
Create a Database: A database is created and used to make
comparisons of all results, such as
scale scores, percentiles, percentages at or above achievement levels, and
comparisons between groups and between years for a group.
Correlational and group
comparisons revealed little to no relationship between value - added
scores and teacher education program regardless of subject area or position on the value - added
scale.
For
comparison, iFixit gave Amazon's Kindle Fire an eight out of 10
score on the same
scale in a recent teardown.
In
comparison to those who participated less than 6 times a year, they
scored higher on a
scale that measures intrinsic motivation to experience.
A
comparison of Hamilton Depression
Scale scores before and after treatment showed a significant reduction in the
scores for the electroacupuncture group.
The Whiteley - 7
scale is used in different versions in the medical literature, and to make
comparison between different versions easier, we transformed the
scores of the Whiteley - 7 into a
scale ranging from 0 — 100 by the expression (a patient's actual
score — lowest possible
score (i.e. 0)-RRB- / (Highest possible
score (i.e. 28)-- lowest possible
score (i.e. 0)-RRB- × 100.
Bear in mind that people react to stress in different ways, as you spot your stressors and do a
comparison of the
scores on the stress
scale.
Direct
comparison of MCS responses with published data on the SDQ and PLE
scales from general population samples was afforded by use of the original items, response options and
scoring methods for these
scales.
Capacity for direct
comparison of MCS data with published data from similar large, general population samples was limited for the other
scales owing to modification from the original response formats to a standard three - choice format, adoption of a standard method of summed total
scores for all
scales and by minor alterations to the wording of some items.
Domitrovich, Cortes, and Greenberg (2007) found that the intervention group
scored significantly better than the
comparison group on the Assessment of Children's Emotions
Scale — Accuracy, meaning children exposed to PATHS ® had a larger receptive emotion vocabulary and were more accurate in identifying feelings.
Analysis showed improved
scores on the CES - D and the Global Assessment of Functioning
Scale (GAF)
scales for the CWD - A group in
comparison with care as usual, with the
comparison group being over 5 times more likely to develop depression at one year.
To characterize the sample, descriptive statistics (Mean [M], standard deviation [SD]-RRB- were calculated for the T -
scores on each CBCL
scale, along with the percentage of siblings and
comparison peers falling outside the normal range.
Following the intervention program, participants who were initially symptomatic reported significantly lower depression and stress
scores on the Depression Anxiety Stress
Scales in
comparison to individuals on the waitlist.