As the reputed
scholar Thomas Mc Evilleyonce put it, the process of conceiving each series and major project of Ulay «as a coherent world in itself, while
shifting through a variety of artistic points of
view, not regarding any one of them as absolute».
One
view — advocated most prominently by Kristen Tiscione and Ellie Margolis — suggests that e-memos constitute a new and distinct legal writing genre.23 These commentators posit that the change in medium — from paper to email — creates a fundamental
shift in the way that legal analysis is conducted and communicated.24 These
scholars argue, for example, that the comparative informality of the e-memo and its lack of prescribed elements creates a more organic format, where writers are free to combine traditional sections like the facts, brief answer, question presented, and conclusion in ways that are more «accessible, efficient, and appropriate.»