School choice proponents say that charter schools and vouchers offer parents important options for their children's education — allowing them to leave their neighborhood schools in search of something better — and that traditional public schools have failed in many places.
Not exact matches
Rep. Skip Stam (R - Wake), one of the most notable
proponents behind the
school voucher law,
said yesterday at the
school choice breakfast that he wants to expand the program further from its $ 10 million starting point.
Proponents of the program
say the voucher program is a way to give students better
choices when it comes to their education; critics
say it siphons badly needed funds away from public education and funnels them into unaccountable, religious private
schools that are not obligated to hold themselves to high quality teaching standards.
«Madam Secretary, seriously, you're not answering the question,» an exasperated Pocan
said as he neared the end of his five allotted minutes to question the controversial
school -
choice proponent during her appearance before the House Education Appropriations subcommittee.
But
proponents of
school choice say the new limits — $ 4,700 this year and $ 4,800 next year for students in grades K - 8 — are still too low to pay tuition at many private
schools.
The harsh reality is that Hillary Clinton has actually been a vocal
proponent of the corporate education reform agenda and she has a long way to go before it can be
said that she is the best
choice for students, parents, public
schools or the teachers who make up the American Federation of Teachers.
«Well, this is very interesting and it raises a lot of questions,»
said Rep. Jon Hardister, R - Guilford, a
proponent of
school choice and a secondary sponsor of the
school voucher legislation.
«
Choice»
proponents will
say in their most incredulous voice, «You'd leave those kids trapped in those failing
schools.»
Speaker John Boehner, a
school choice proponent, sent a letter with other lawmakers to Attorney General Eric Holder
saying he found DOJ's claims «extremely troubling and paradoxical in nature.»