School choice proponents who seek to prove that vouchers, tax credits and scholarships «work» by citing test - score - based research have allowed themselves to be lured into argument that can never be completely won.
Not exact matches
In theory, the concept might appeal to those
who think taxpayers
who don't use public
schools should get other benefits instead — and to
proponents of allowing parents even greater flexibility and
choice than vouchers offer them.
The Citizens» Commission on Civil Rights, along with the Aspen Institute's NCLB Commission and other
proponents, have proposed tough new measures to guarantee public
school choice to children
who attend persistently low - performing
schools.
Gov. Bryant,
who has been a longtime
proponent of
school choice, made similar comments at the Neshoba County Fair this past July.
I look forward to Democrats divorcing themselves from a relationship of convenience with Republicans,
who have elevated what a
school choice proponent really looks like in DeVos.
Many «
school choice»
proponents,
who themselves write for the media, want you to believe that the Trump / DeVos / Alexander funding for
school choice initiatives are going nowhere this year.
And now the battle is headed toward political center stage:
School choice has gained perhaps its most powerful
proponent ever in Trump,
who has called it «the civil rights issue of our time» and pledged to spend $ 20 billion to push for an expansion of charters and vouchers.
The harsh reality is that Hillary Clinton has actually been a vocal
proponent of the corporate education reform agenda and she has a long way to go before it can be said that she is the best
choice for students, parents, public
schools or the teachers
who make up the American Federation of Teachers.
But many of the
school -
choice proponents,
who had long made the case that their favored reform works, had an explanation at the ready.
The governor - elect is pledging to appoint an education commissioner
who's a
proponent of charter
schools and public
school choice.
In Ohio, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative think tank and
proponent of
school choice, released a study of that state's program which found: «Students
who use vouchers to attend private
schools have fared worse academically compared to their closely matched peers attending public
schools.»
Charter
school proponents claim that charters offer options for parents
who are disappointed in what their public
schools provide, and this «
choice» is about giving children better options.