Sentences with phrase «science board reviews»
The ARM Science Board reviews field research campaign proposals for using the ARM Facility.
https://www.arm.gov/ Not exact matches
Editorial Review Board, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making Editorial Review Board, Marketing Science
The peer - reviewed social science journal that published the study, along with commentary alongside it, commissions a member of its own editorial board (who has an openly hostile view of the study) to «audit» the peer - review process.
Until someone with proper expertise in myriad areas of sports science, football coaching, business, finance, law, PR, media, marketing, human resources etc etc has unfettered access to all board meeting minutes, records of all discussions with players, full player medical records, details of all contacts with agents, other clubs, other players, seen copies of player contracts and negotiations, understands the financial imperatives, interprets the business accounting, has reviewed the business plan, has knowledge of the employer / employee contractual relationship between Wenger and the club, has intimate insight in to the goals and objectives of the business and the club — then everyone is filling in the gaps with their own version of events and will necessarily always be a long, long way from anything close to any «truth».
This research was approved by the institutional review board at Oregon Health and Science University, which did not require informed consent for the use of preexisting administrative data.
To make sure that we represent the science accurately, we have a board of seven expert advisers from a variety of fields (including economics, medicine and policy) who review all of our publications, provide us with guidance, and occasionally collaborate on joint research projects.
Hyman is the editor of the Annual Review of Neuroscience, President of the International Neuroethics Society, and a member of the Institute of Medicine of the U.S. National Academies where he serves on the governing Council, the Board of Health Science Policy, and chairs the Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders which brings together industry, government, and academia.
[BOX 5] Alliance of Third Class Non-Profit Mailers, 1981 - 1982 Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) files I, 1981 II, 1980 - 1981 III, 1978 - 1980 IV, 1979 - 1980 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1969 - 1981 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1981 - 1982 Department of Education, 1977 - 1978 Energy Research Advisory Board Multiprogram Laboratory Panel, 10/15/81 -11 / 19/82 Institute of Medicine - I, 1982 - 1983 Institute of Medicine - II, 1979 - 1982 Roger W. Jones Award, 1979 - 1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1982 Mellon (Andrew W.) Project, 1978 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: I, 1981 - 1984 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: II, 1981 - 1982 National Committee on Public Employee Pension Systems (PEPS), July 1982 National Governors» Association Meeting - Task Force on Technological Innovation, 2/21/82 National Publication Act of 1979 Office of Technology Assessment, 1972 - 1973 Peace and Conflict Resolution, 1980 Pensions for Professionals, 1971 - 1972 Saturday Review of Science, 1972 - 1979 Scientists and Engineers Emigrant Fund, 1978 - 1979 SOHIO, Standard Oil of Ohio Grant, 1982 - 1986 Technology in Science - Advisory Board, 1981 Tyler Prize, 1984 - 1985 White House Study of Science and Engineering Education, 1980 Znaiye (Soviet Scholarly Society), 1971 - 1977
The project aimed to set up a network of Indian scientists and engineers to facilitate communication and increase their participation on committees and boards working on public science policy and minorities in science issues, as well as scientific peer review panels.
Leading scientific organizations are calling on President Donald Trump and his administration to ensure that an ongoing review of the role of scientific advisory boards is transparent and upholds the integrity of the boards» science - driven information, and that accurate federal scientific data and information is maintained and made easily available on federal agency websites.
In fact, he is the only person to sit both on the UK Government's Steering Board for the Public Debate on genetic modification and the Science Review Panel for GMOs.
Science also instructs and expects our Board of Reviewing Editors and reviewers to treat manuscripts as confidential material.
As of mid-December, both papers were being reviewed by the government's National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB).
Most submitted papers are rated for suitability by members of Science's Board of Reviewing Editors.
She tapped into the communication and policy skills she gained while serving as a member of the National Postdoctoral Association (NPA) Board of Directors as she applied for a diverse number of jobs: a patent clerk, a science review administrator at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), and an industry researcher.
In an email to Science, the paper's corresponding author, Toshihiro Nakajima of Tokyo Medical University, defended the work, stating: «Our manuscript was formally published after an intensive scientific review done by reviewers and by the editorial board of Scientific Reports.»
Based on findings from an independent review board in Sweden, Science pulled the study because: The experiments lacked ethical approval, the original data could not be provided and questions emerged about experimental methods.
Unfortunately, the panel's recommendations were rejected by the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, the panel's recommendations were not implemented by National Institutes of Health extramural research programs, and projects creating new potential pandemic pathogens were funded and performed with absolutely no risk - benefit review.
And for several years he has chaired the Board on Science Education at the National Academies» National Research Council, which reviewed NASA's education programs and found them wanting.
Previously, research groups had to get approval for each project involving human ES cells from their own Institutional Review Board (IRB) and then from a national committee under the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology.
Science editors make these initial screening decisions with advice from the Board of Reviewing Editors, a group of more than 100 working scientists.
Further on he warns that in the oversight committee's next funding round in July, «negative decisions» about peer - reviewed grants awaiting the board's final approval «would have a fatal impact on CPRIT's peer review system» and would «be extremely harmful to the research community's view of science in Texas, and thus on the ability to recruit scientists to the state.»
Last month, in a surprising shift, the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) recommended that Fouchier's study be published in full, along with a similar one by Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, under review by Nature (Science, 6 April, p. 19).
«Given the current climate — I mean, political situation — in Washington, I'm wondering whether highlighting [clean energy] is something we still want to do,» board member G. P. (Bud) Peterson asked today during the board's review of the next edition of Science & Engineering Indicators, a biennial compendium of global trends in science and techScience & Engineering Indicators, a biennial compendium of global trends in science and techscience and technology.
Last month, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) recommended that key details be redacted from the studies, which are under review at Nature and Science.
The two papers have both been reviewed at length by the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSSAB), and both have been the subject of intense global media attention the past 2 months.
Program in Engineering Studies, Stanford University IREX, International Research and Exchange Board Korea Science Foundation National Academy of Engineering National Academy of Science National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges OAS OECD Review of U.S. paper for OECD workshop, Fall 1981 Operation Crossroads Africa, Inc..
Coupled with a review of these results by experts on a molecular tumor board, the opportunity exists to identify novel therapies that would target specific abnormalities,» notes senior author of the work, Shridar Ganesan, MD, PhD, associate director for translational science at Rutgers Cancer Institute and associate professor of medicine and pharmacology at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
«The UN Scientific Advisory Board, ICSU (the International Council for Science), National Academies of Science, and other bodies and networks, in collaboration with UNESCO and the UN system, would run a rigorous process of scientific review and assessment identifying possible risks and opportunities related to key political decisions.»
Other presentations addressed radiation concepts, radon occurrence and health hazards, risk and probability, the renal toxicity of uranium, ground - water science and water quality, uranium in situ leach mining, elements of the proposed NUAKHP, and requirements for approval of human health studies by the Navajo Nation's Human Research Review Board.
In considering applications, reviewers are instructed to address the two Merit Review Criteria as approved by the National Science Board - Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts (NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide).
She acts as referee for review committees and is in the Editorial board of science journals.
Driessen has been nominated for the Science Advisory Board, an entity created in 1978 to provide, «independent advice and peer review on the scientific and technical aspects of environmental issues to the EPA's Administrator.»
NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) head Thomas Zurbuchen ordered an independent review by the project's Standing Review Board (SRB) of whether JWST could meet the revised launch date oreview by the project's Standing Review Board (SRB) of whether JWST could meet the revised launch date oReview Board (SRB) of whether JWST could meet the revised launch date or not.
This committee, informally called the Fink Committee, prepared a report entitled «Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism» that made sweeping recommendations to enact regular risk assessments of biotechnology, enhance education, strengthen international oversight, and establish the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to carry out reviews and advise the government.
A draft version of the questionnaire was reviewed by numerous individuals affiliated with the PSM initiative, including members of the Board of Directors of the National Professional Science Master's Association (NPSMA) and members of the Council of Graduate Schools PSM Advisory Board.
The policy they propose the NIH adopt was included in the recommended guidelines of the National Academy of Science and the International Society for Stem Cell Research, and is followed by many Institutional Review Boards, a fact that would make it easier for those institutions to accept NIH approved cells for research if the NIH changes its policy.
In keeping with the Research Program's aim to support scientists from all areas of the biological sciences and beyond, the AAF Scientific Review Board itself represents a broad spectrum of scientific expertise, and all applications are reviewed by the Board.
Year in Review: Calico and the Buck Institute Are Collaborating on Research into Aging and Potential Therapeutics for Age - related Diseases Top Grant from the NIH Faculty Awards Published Research Buck Faculty Share Their Expertise Worldwide Buck Labs Focus on mTOR Pathway Live Longer, Live Well — New Donor Groups Get Behind the Buck's Mission Full STEAM Ahead: Unique Partnership Helps Marin and Sonoma Schools Meet New Science Standards Energy and Climate Change Visionary Jostein Eikeland Pledges $ 5 Million to the Buck Scientific Advisory Board Board of Trustees Financial Summary Buck Advisory Council Cumulative Donors and Sponsors Honor Roll of Donors
He is currently an Editor of Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing (Springer) and a member of the Editorial Board of Applied Physics Reviews (American Institute of Physics).
Legates has been nominated for the Science Advisory Board, an entity created in 1978 to provide, «independent advice and peer review on the scientific and technical aspects of environmental issues to the EPA's Administrator.»
In 1966, Dr. London left the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to join Dr. Blumberg at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, where he went on to become a senior member of the Division of Population Science, director of the Liver Cancer Prevention Center, and then chairman of the Institutional Review Board.
Dayaratna has been nominated for the Science Advisory Board, an entity created in 1978 to provide, «independent advice and peer review on the scientific and technical aspects of environmental issues to the EPA's Administrator.»
Editor - in - Chief of Volume 31; Elected to Council of Gordon Research Conferences, 1984 - 1987; College of Natural Sciences Award for Teaching Excellence, 1984; Appointed to the Editorial Board of Polyhedron, 1984 - 1998; Mobay Lecturer, University of New Hampshire, 1985; Karcher Lecturer, University of Oklahoma, 1985; Appointed to the Editorial Board of the Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1986 - 1991; Elected Councilor, American Chemical Society, Division of Inorganic Chemistry, 1986 - 1989; Appointed to the Editorial Board of the Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 1987 -; Appointed to the American Chemical Society Committee on Divisional Activities, 1987 - 1989; Reilly Lecturer, University of Notre Dame, 1987; Appointed to the Air Force Office of Scientific Research Chemical Sciences Review Panel, 1987 - 1990; Appointed to the Editorial Board of Organometallics, 1988 - 1991; Appointed to the Editorial Board of Progress in Inorganic Chemistry, 1988 -; Appointed to the Editorial Board of Heteroatom Chemistry, 1988 - 1996; Elected to the Board of Trustees of the Gordon Research Conferences, 1989 - 1998; Appointed to the Editorial Board of Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, 1989 -; Irvine Lecturer, St. Andrews University, Scotland, 1989; Fischel Lecturer, Vanderbilt University, 1991; Frontiers of Science Lecturer, Wayne State University, 1991; Appointed by Governor Richards of Texas to the Executive Board of Texas Science and Mathematics Renaissance Centers, 1991 - 93; Baxter Lecturer, Northern Illinois University, 1992; Appointed to the Scientific Committee of the European Journal of Solid State and Inorganic Chemistry, 1992 - 8.
Lupo has been nominated for the Science Advisory Board, an entity created in 1978 to provide, «independent advice and peer review on the scientific and technical aspects of environmental issues to the EPA's Administrator.»
He is also in the Advisory Board of Nanomedicine, Nanotechnology Reviews and the Journal of Peptide Science.
He has served as a visiting scholar at Harvard University, on the Chemical Reviews Editorial Advisory Board, the Governor's Mathematics and Science Advisory Board for South Carolina, the Defense Science Study Group through the Institute for Defense Analyses, the Defense Science Board Chem / Nano Study Section, the Department of Commerce Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee and the MD Anderson Cancer Research Center's Competitive Grant Renewal Board.
The science and innovation behind our formulas, which are researched, developed, clinically tested, and reviewed by our esteemed medical board of advisors.
Recent updates: Added 1/14: First Showing (additional critic), Slashfilm (additional critic) Added 1/8: Birth.Movies.Death (additional critics), Parallax View, The Tracking Board Added 1/7: Film Journey, The Film Stage (additional critic), First Showing (additional critic) Added 1/5: The Film Stage (additional critics), In Review, Moving Picture Blog, The Playlist (additional critics), Slashfilm (additional critics), Taste of Cinema Added 1/3: CBS News, Den of Geek [UK], Film Pulse, The Film Stage (substituted individual lists for consensus list), Hidden Remote, The Playlist (additional critics), PopCulture.com, Reverse Shot, ScreenAnarchy, Slant (substituted individual lists for consensus list), Slashfilm, Wichita Eagle Added 12/31: artsBHAM, Cape Cod Times, CinemaBlend (additional critics), Collider (additional critics), Criterion [The Daily], Criterion Cast, The Film Stage, First Showing, Flavorwire, The Globe and Mail, The Hollywood Reporter / Heat Vision, Lincoln Journal Star, Monkeys Fighting Robots, NOW Magazine, Omaha World - Herald, Paste, People, ReelViews, Salt Lake City Weekly, San Antonio Current, Screen Daily, SF Weekly, These Violent Delights, Toledo Blade, Uncut, Under the Radar, Vancouver Observer, Vancouver Sun Added 12/29: The Arts Desk, Austin American - Statesman, Austin Chronicle, Awards Daily, Boston Globe, Boston Herald, CinemaBlend (additional critics), Cleveland Scene, Collider (additional critics), The Daily Beast, Deadline, Film Journal International, Houston Chronicle, Ioncinema, Las Vegas Review - Journal, New Orleans Times - Picayune, New York Post, Paper, The Playlist, San Diego City Beat, San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Examiner, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Salt Lake Tribune, Seattle Weekly, Shepherd Express, The Stranger, Tallahassee Democrat, Toronto Star, Tucson Weekly, Tulsa World, Uproxx, The Virginian - Pilot, Washington City Paper, White City Cinema Added 12/27: Awards Campaign, Baltimore Beat, Buffalo News, Chicago Daily Herald, CinemaBlend, Collider, Film School Rejects, GameSpot, JoBlo, Metro UK, Newsweek, Observer, San Jose Mercury News, Seattle Times, Sydney Morning Herald, Tampa Bay Times, Thrillist, USA Today, Village Voice (Wolfe), Wired UK Added 12/22: Chicago Sun - Times, Den of Geek [US], The Guardian, Mashable, Metro US, Sioux City Journal, Star Tribune, The Verge, Wired Added 12/21: BBC, Chicago Reader, The Commercial Appeal, IGN, Las Vegas Weekly, TimeOut New York, Village Voice Added 12/20: A.V. Club, Crave, Esquire, The Independent, Spectrum Culture Added 12/19: The Atlantic, Birth.Movies.Death., CineVue, Newsday, NPR, WhatCulture Added 12/18: Arizona Republic, Yahoo! Added 12/17: Dazed, Flood Magazine, New Zealand Herald, Salon, ScreenCrush, The Star - Ledger (NJ.com), Time Out London, Total Film Added 12/15: BuzzFeed, Christian Science Monitor, Detroit News, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Daily News, Vox Added 12/14: Associated Press, Chicago Tribune, Consequence of Sound, Little White Lies, Los Angeles Daily News, RogerEbert.com, TheWrap Added 12/13: Evening Standard, Variety Added 12/12: The Hollywood Reporter, Huffington Post, PopCrush Added 12/11: CBC, The Observer [UK], Wall Street Journal Added 12/8: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, Slant Added 12/7: Culture Trip, IMDb, The Ringer, Slate, Time, Us Weekly Added 12/6: Cahiers du Cinéma, New York Times, Vogue, Vulture (Yoshida), Washington Post Added 12/5: Scorecard launched with 15 lists.
Also in my store: Science Test Review Game Board and 140 Game Cards