Sentences with phrase «science debate question»
Would Myron say the following part of Trump's reply to the Science Debate question on climate change has merit?
https://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/ Not exact matches
Scientists who don't debate or question settled science might miss opportunities for a new breakthrough that hadn't been observed or conceived of by a human mind.
What science is currently debating is abiogenisis which is still a mystery, but to say god did it and move on to the next question would be a cop out..
First a Noah's Ark discovery raised a flood of questions, then there was the much - hyped debate over life's origins between Bill Nye the Science Guy and creationist Ken Ham.
I have a lot of faith in science, not in the unscientific assumption that atheists make that reality is purely mechanistic, but in the procedures of testing hypotheses, questioning assumptions, measuring results, replicating experiments, and in general debating and persuading based on actual evidence.
The social sciences are quite prominent in the curriculum of Nanjing Theological Seminary, a fact that is understandable in light of the significant debates in China over the question of religion's definition.
Rumbling beneath all of the evangelical debates about sovereignty, science, heaven, and hell are some serious questions about the Bible.
Science should raise questions and debate, but it is a sound foundation on which to find answers.
The discussion highlighted the need for a substantive parliamentary debate on the current abortion legislation since medical science and practice is raising serious questions over when the foetus becomes viable outside the womb, the current twenty - four week limit for «social» abortion and the growing number of doctors in the UK who are refusing to perform abortions because of the aforementioned.
The race to grow the next «world's hottest pepper» has ignited a heated debate among chiliheads, one that raises deep questions about science, ethics, and honor.
Obama Secretly Laid Out Why Climate Skeptics Are Bad For Democracy Former President Barack Obama said while debating climate change policy solutions is good for democracy, questioning the underlying science is bad for society.
This free public event aims to discuss the progress that has been made along with a Question Time style debate and drinks reception at this years BA Festival of Science.
At Britain in 2014 we're opening up social science research to policymakers and the public, encouraging challenge and debate and building a two - way flow of questions and knowledge.»
In his speech, Kerry noted that the president «has repeatedly questioned the underlying science of climate change and attempted to reignite the debate over whether the threat is real.»
AAAS will work with other science organizations to inject a science question into the 2016 presidential debates, and to counter any scientific misinformation that arises during the campaigns, he said.
Biologists may never be able to definitively answer the question of when human life begins, but I'm happy to see science weighing in on the debate.
From Obama's answers to questions presented by Science Debate 08 and the Scientists & Engineers for America: «Solutions to this critical problem will require close collaboration between federal, state and local governments, and the people and businesses affected.
AAAS has joined more than a dozen leading U.S. science and engineering organizations in preparing a list of science questions that they say President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney should debate in the 2012 campaign.
And there was this great, it was my favorite moment of the weekend and it was this very dramatic moment, when basically Emanuel was complaining a little bit, very politely, and smiling about the fact that journalists still are doing stories about, you know, the debate around climate science, but there's not really, of course, there's not a debate, there's consensus that anthropogenic global warming is happening and that, why are you still doing these stories, asking questions?
There were several debates among the science representatives of the three parties, but they struggled to differentiate their parties on most issues, including the central question of future research funding.
There is no question that it was stuffed full of imaginative and useful events — schoolchildren debating genetics or drawing posters, teachers discussing space science, and young people making videos on environmental topics.
During the past two presidential campaigns, efforts were made by the science and engineering communities to engage candidates in a «user - friendly» science policy conversation not designed to be a debate (questions were to be provided in advance and «contentious» issues were off limits).
Derek did actually leave off some of that that I'm very proud of that I would like to mention, partly because I'm heard by the old giant, is that I founded an organization called Science Debate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized queScience Debate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized quesDebate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized quesdebate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized quescience; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized questions.
So that when the presidential election came up and I noticed that the presidential candidates were not being asked questions about science in the debate, I, along with five friends of mine, started this thing Science Debatscience in the debate, I, along with five friends of mine, started this thing Science Debatedebate, I, along with five friends of mine, started this thing Science DebatScience DebateDebate 2008.
All of these questions and more are addressed by science today in the real world and often cook up debates between religious groups.
In the Socratic Seminar, the teacher's main role is to facilitate a dialogue but not a debate, through questioning thathelps students take greater responsibility for their own thinking and talking.These discussions are used as the foundation for a variety of writing responses that enable students to reflect upon the dialogue, deepen their own thinking and clarify their own ideas.While often used in English Language Arts classrooms, Socratic Seminars can be used in social studies, science even art and music classrooms.
There's plenty of debate out there among people far more literate in science and economics than I regarding the merits of neuroeconomics, including questions about whether it's one discipline or the other or just another fancy term coined to codify otherwise unexplainable behavior.
Relevant and inspiring, the works on display provoke a series of questions and open up a debate — from playing with form to questioning the boundaries of each medium and merging the worlds of art and science to stimulate discussion on social, environmental and historical issues.
One came in his responses to the questions posed by the Science Debate organization:
Or has the science - journalism complex decided that debate about these questions, too, is «over»?»
Hidden behind the flow of fact - free tweets and edge - wooing stump statements, Trump's campaign had posted reasonable ideas when the Science Debate organization asked questions on the role of science funding in fostering innovation (it's great, unless it's climate science, evidently) and the merits of a post-fossil energy Science Debate organization asked questions on the role of science funding in fostering innovation (it's great, unless it's climate science, evidently) and the merits of a post-fossil energy science funding in fostering innovation (it's great, unless it's climate science, evidently) and the merits of a post-fossil energy science, evidently) and the merits of a post-fossil energy system.
At a «science debate,» candidates will try to claim that their position is the one supported by «science,» and the very structure of the debate will send voters the faulty message that these are questions that the natural sciences can resolve.
The organizers of the debate have been accumulating thousands of endorsements — including those of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science — and hundreds of possible questions, as well, which can be explored on their Web site.
The debate isn't happening — the way politics works probably guaranteed that outcome — but much credit goes to the organizers for at least getting answers from their campaign staffs to 14 questions on science and technology policy, winnowed from more than 3,400 questions submitted by scientists and concerned citizens.
In the end, the best way to resolve such questions is in the peer - reviewed literature, but it's valuable to have some discourse here given the way simplified interpretations of single papers («single study syndrome») often swamp policy debates even as the process of science grinds forward.
Every good science «debate» have ever seen took an hour or so to mull over a tiny question, led immediately to a couple new testable hypotheses and experimental designs — each of which required a few months of independent bench work, though in some fields a week of computer time might be a more appropriate tool — and then ended up in a second, reconvened session in which evidence was presented and another aspect of the problem was discussed.
The incident sparked debate about Antarctic tourism disrupting science, including on Dot Earth, raising a serious question: Who has the right to visit Antarctica?
Searching for hints, I clicked to the welcome effort by the organization Science Debate to engage the four presidential candidates» campaign teams on 20 science questions, if not an actual science Science Debate to engage the four presidential candidates» campaign teams on 20 science questions, if not an actual science dDebate to engage the four presidential candidates» campaign teams on 20 science questions, if not an actual science science questions, if not an actual science science debatedebate.
Then I noted that the specific questions in the science that are most relevant to the average person and the policy debate are far more uncertain and the source of real (not manufactured) scientific debate.
In revealing that the policy debate will inevitably come down to finding a balance, Rosenberg's piece helpfully reminds readers that climate science only frames this question, but does not offer a clear answer on what to do.
Such a voice can have a place in a story focused on the policy debate, for example, but not in a story where the only questions are about science.
The refusal to admit questions of degree into the climate debate is a sure sign that the debate is neither as clearly divided as Mann claims, nor that science can resolve it simply.
Readers of Bishop Hill blog will already know that Chief Executive of the SMC, Fiona Fox, is chairing a «debate» about the question «Are there really two sides to every science story?
A proposed media - relations budget of $ 600,000, not counting any money for advertising, would be directed at science writers, editors, columnists and television network correspondents, using as many as 20 «respected climate scientists» recruited expressly «to inject credible science and scientific accountability into the global climate debate, thereby raising questions about and undercutting the «prevailing scientific wisdom.»»
Watts edits the blog Watts Up With That, which questions climate science and presents, «the untold story of the climate debate from the climate skeptic side.»
Facts about a debate that's turned up more questions than answers,» includes a statement by then Exxon CEO Lee Raymond trumping up uncertainty in the science behind global warming as well as the cost of a carbon - restricted market.
Unfortunately, relative to climate science, whoever takes a skeptical position in the debate, or even question orthodoxy, would immediately be labeled a big oil shill, discredited, and displayed in the proverbial town square to be mocked and ridiculed; ultimately to be branded a heretic.
What he finds may surprise you and raise questions about the role of science in political debates.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how the tobacco industry attempted to trivialise the health risks of second hand smoke (SHS) by both questioning the science of risk assessment of low dose exposure to other environmental toxins, and by comparing SHS to such substances about which debate might still exist.
The great global - warming debate has taken shape around those who say the science is too uncertain to justify action and those who warn that we can not afford the luxury of waiting for science to answer all our questions.