Science works because inconsistencies and confounding factors are challenged thus leading to a better understanding.
Not exact matches
Despite some companies recalling employees to the office, the overall trend is rising, in part
because science shows people are more productive and happier when they
work from home.
Never mind that his reason for abandoning a political
science degree at the University of New Brunswick early was
because he got a job
working for the province's premier.
According to
science, reverse psychology
works because of a psychological effect known as reactance.
Cold emailing can be a
science and the fundamental reason it doesn't
work as well as you want it to is
because everybody is doing it.
No «Magic» in scinece ID proponernts Behe and Dembski have been thoroughly disenfranchised by the
science community
because their
work is philosophical religious garbage designed only for the gullible and unreasoned.
Science is the hard
work of people who actually care and want to find better solutions to the problems and ills in our lives, without convincing themselves that somebody higher is going to offer the solutions simply
because they talk to that dark void.
An assertion that there is a God
because you don't understand how something
works is called religion and has no place in
Science.
Because science has kind of proven or talked about all those things you were just asking... maybe pick up a book other than a
work of fiction and learn something that's real and tangible.
We know it
works and we know that the vast majority of
science is within the bull eye
because bridges and buildings don't fall, satellites
work, GPS
works, heart surgery
works, the list is too long to continue.
scot: evolution along with many other fields of
science are called «hard
sciences»
because we have proof of how things
work.
One of the reasons
science has
worked so well when other systems have failed is that it doesn't rely on intuition / common sense,
because they are so often wrong when dealing with the realities of the universe.
Because science doesn't represent it's theories as truth, just as models that
work.
Being a YEC is not an automatic disqualification for doing scientific
work because science is driven by an objective methodology, so as long as that methodology is not compromised then one is free to think whatever they please.
Neither should we choose any of the numerous
works in which Whitehead establishes mathematics as derivative from the abstract theory of classes or intuitive set theory,
because in these
works he acknowledges the paradoxes in set theory that drove him to affirm for a time Russell's logistic thesis that mathematics is the «
science concerned with the logical deduction of consequences from the general premises of all reasoning» (MAT 291).
This is striking
because he calls what he is doing in that
work «
science» (episteme) and, according to his own Posterior analytics, a
science ought to be so arranged.
Because he was not afraid of metaphysical questions, Whitehead
worked out an alternative to substance thinking that fits the evidence of the
sciences while differing from their usual formulations.
In as far as the
work of the demiurge is imperfect, it does not allow
science - either empirical, or rational -
because the deviation from the original telos follows no rules, but arises from a principle of irrationality.
Mr. Nye seems to have conveniently forgotten that most modern
science exists
because of the thinking and hard
work of creationists throughout history.
Science is useful
because it
works, that is it's greatest test.
He was excited when he arrived on campus
because, after years of
working in other environments, he thought that he was finally about to learn, from his colleagues on the faculty, how one could teach
science in a way that was integrated fully with the faith.
You religious fanatics envy
science because it
works and are always trying to redefine
science to include magic and mysticism.
Science only
works so well
because it continually attempts to destroy its own ideas with competing evidence or ideas that take into account all the evidence in hand.
This is undoubtably the case,
because science has never explained something that was supposed to be gods
work (tides, earth being centre of universe)... / sarcasm
That model is constantly being reviewed and altered as necessary,
BECAUSE THATS HOW
SCIENCE WORKS.
Although the dismissal of other disciplines is lamentable, it is right and good that
science is taken as true —
because it
works.
But if it is in fifty or a hundred years, it will not be
because of reports to Congress defending the humanities but
because English and humanities professors move away from the research paradigm of the
sciences and return to the sort of
work natural to the discipline.
Our education system is quickly becoming the laughing stock of the first world countries
because we are too busy trying to convince school children that evolution isn't real, thus trying to negate centuries of hard
work in multiple fields of
science.
First, discussion of Intelligent Design's argument against neo-Darwinism is out of place in a high - school
science classroom
because most scientists
working in the area do not accept the Intelligent Design criticism of neo-Darwinism and
because understanding the scientific issues involves sophisticated arguments far beyond the capacity of nonspecialists, let alone high - school students.
just
because a naturalistic explanation does not exist presently for many of the questions which anyone can ask — that doesn't give license to ignorant, infantile, delusional suboid humans to answer those questions by skipping all the requisite hard
work science demands only to jump directly to «god did it».
It's not rocket
science, these are basic theories / opinions which many think would make us great, but the obstinate one will not do what other want him to
because he is obsessed with proving sensible voices wrong by playing decent (but not great) players and playing in a stylish fluid manner, which other teams have
worked out and which makes us largely one dimensional.
I have a degree in Bachelor of
Science in Computer Engineering
because I wanted a
work that spends a lot of time in front of a computer.
Or we stay up until the wee hours of the morning
working on that
science project
because our daughter never did.
Many women of our parents» generation did not breastfeed, many
because they believed the advertising campaigns that said
science (formula) was better than nature or
because they had to return to
work quickly after the birth.
It takes me weeks to spot the significance of this
because the company is usually referred to as ASI Data
Science, a company that has a revolving cast of data scientists who have gone on to
work with Cambridge Analytica and vice versa.
I arrived academy after 8 years
working in international companies (but located in my own country, Chile)
because I thought that I needed to have a varnish of
science and to learns specials things to help me to get a «different» job.
Most scientists enter the world of
science because they have a huge sense of curiosity; they want to know how the world
works.
I only
work with self - hosted WordPress blogs,
because that's the right choice if you are serious about
science blogging.
But «I feel the same pressure with NSF» — the U.S. National
Science Foundation — «
because they also expect progress and [us] to
work on what they fund us for,» says Balazinska, who now also has corporate grants worth $ 70,000 from Microsoft and Cisco Systems.
Brexit was on the mind of many,
because it could severely hinder the ability of European scientists to
work in the U.K. Francisco Diego, an astronomer at University College London, reminded the crowd that
science has shown all humans trace their origins back to Africa.
«I'm probably still more efficient than my peers
because of the way I had to structure my
working environment» early on as a scientist parent, says McKendrick, who is now the head of the optometry and vision
sciences department at the University of Melbourne in Australia.
«Managers of forensic
science labs should consider ways to minimize the overtime that scientists
work, though this may be difficult if scientists must
work more than 40 hours a week to clear backlogs or
because of state mandates and a lack of trained staff to more evenly distribute hours,» Holt said.
Because Iowa's engineering department had a close relationship with the College of Medicine, he was able to receive grants in excess of $ 1 million dollars from the National Institutes of Health and National
Science Foundation, as well as Microsoft, for his
work in AI, specifically robotics and bioinformatics.
«
Because there's a lot more team
science, people must be able to
work in teams.
Scientists across Europe are hailing this year's May Day as a milestone for
science — if only
because, like Illnerova, tens of thousands of scientists now have the freedom that is priceless to their
work.
Because most of Congress's legislative
work occurs within committees, we thought it made sense to find out how the top - ranking members of those committees approach issues that have some sort of foundation in
science.
The simple strategy
works because the
science is simply fascinating.
I completed an M.A.T. in secondary education, specializing in biology, at Winthrop University with the intent of teaching high - school
science, but I decided instead to enter the University of Toledo's doctoral program in biology
because the kid in me still wanted to learn how things
worked.
Angel White, who finished her Ph.D. in Letelier's lab last year and is now a postdoc, landed a NASA earth
science fellowship but decided not to renew
because, she calculated, it was best to keep
working on marine -
science projects supported by NSF instead of NASA - funded research on remote - sensing tools.
Communicating
science to lay audiences is an important skill for all scientists
because, if called upon, we all need to be ready to explain our
work or demonstrate the value of public investment in research.