Sentences with phrase «sciences ethical review»

Not exact matches

Based on findings from an independent review board in Sweden, Science pulled the study because: The experiments lacked ethical approval, the original data could not be provided and questions emerged about experimental methods.

After the trial there will be a review of the efficacy of the approach, the underpinning science and a review of the ethical issues involved.

«Due to the scientific value and ethical dispute of this study, we not only conducted scientific peer - review, but also consulted related publishing and ethical experts,» wrote Rao, a structural biologist at Nankai University in Tianjin, in an e-mail to Science.

Lauren Y. Chan, Queen's University: Genetic Testing and Screening: A Review of the Current Ethical Issues Shannon Chen and Grace Lin, Cornell University: Legalized but Limited: Women's Reproductive Rights in the United States Catherine Dillon, Rutgers University: Urban Forestry, Brownfields, and Human Rights Philip Rodenbough, Columbia University: Peace Through Chemistry: Teaching High School Chemistry in West Africa with the US Peace Corps & Ways to Continue Working at the intersection of International Science, Education, and Human Rights in a Chemistry PhD Program

The role of research integrity in the very structure of contemporary science, addressing cultural practices in its publication system, current ethical challenges in peer review and its consequences regarding the reliability of the research record.

Anybody with an education in the sciences can tell when a credentialed charlatan is violating scientific method, «cherry - picking» data, manipulating computer simulations (climate models) to «draw the curve, then plot the points,» concealing his raw observational data sets from properly skeptical examiners, corrupting academic peer review (both to suppress the publication of colleagues» studies casting doubt upon the reviewing officers» pet hypotheses and to ensure that the submissions of «The Team» do not suffer impediments to publication), and concerting all these violations of professional ethical standards by way of back - room confabs and some of the most incredibly stupid e-mails this side of Enron's «Smartest Guys in the Room.»

«Unfortunately for this option, we have recently learned (through the kind intervention of Nielsen - Gammon here), that, even in the case of open review comments, ethical standards within the climate science community forbid speculation on the identity of Reviewer # 2»