Sentences with phrase «scientific editor of the journal»

Interview with Jason Fung, chief of the department of medicine at Scarborough General Hospital on the board of directors of Low Carb Diabetes Association and the scientific editor of the Journal of Insulin Resistance, chatting about why calorie counting doesn't work, how to lower insulin levels, and intermittent fasting to encourage fat burning.

Interview with Jason Fung, chief of the department of medicine at Scarborough General Hospital on the board of directors of Low Carb Diabetes Association and the scientific editor of the Journal of Insulin Resistance, chatting about why calorie...

She is the Scientific Editor of the Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery for the Association of Avian Veterinarians, a position she has held since 1994.

Not exact matches

The impossibility of specifying explicit rules is one of the reasons why editors of scientific journals and panels awarding research grants must have considerable discretionary power in evaluating new ideas.

Third, acknowledging that some of the blame for the biased and one - sided media reporting on head injuries rests with some members of the scientific community who issue one - sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization» in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately, of the intense competition for grant money in Concussion, Inc.), gives way to greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth debates at large academic conferences.

He is principal investigator of the Scientific Leadership Team of the 2015 British Election Study and is joint editor of the Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.

This is the Rebuttal Letter that you send to the editor of the scientific journal detailing how you addressed the changes suggested by the reviewers.

Soon after she became deputy news editor (and later, news editor) for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, a scientific journal published by Oxford UniversityJournal of the National Cancer Institute, a scientific journal published by Oxford Universityjournal published by Oxford University Press.

I have advocated before that one way to mitigate problems with null - hypothesis significance testing is for editors of scientific journals to employ «results blind» decision making in determining whether to publish and make it be known that they are doing so.

Policies and procedures for handling these cases will continue to evolve, and she offered some solutions that were discussed at a recent Journals Summit convened by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, but in the end, she emphasized, «the editor's paramount concern should be for the integrity of the scientific record.»

► «The involvement of [online communities in discussions about suspect publications and possible research misconduct] has made the standardization of processes to address allegations more complex and has led to less patience from the scientific community and the public with what are often long timelines in institutional misconduct investigations,» Science journals Editor - in - Chief Marcia McNutt wrote in an editorial in this week's issue of Science.

I am frequently asked what in my background qualifies me for a job as the managing editor of a scientific journal.

Shortly after I reached this new state of self - awareness, I took a position as acting managing editor with an online, peer - reviewed scientific journal called Conservation Ecology.

Most people learn «by doing,» says Dario Sambunjak, a senior editor at the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) and research fellow in education and scientific method at Zagreb University School of Medicine in Croatia.

The three editors (Frances Brodsky, University of California, San Francisco), Mark Marsh (University College London), and Sandra Schmid (The Scripps Research Institute)-- who retain responsibility for making the scientific decisions — realized that the journal could not be successful without someone with the appropriate scientific background to handle the journal's daily operation.

Scientific journal editors must be able to read and understand the scientific literature in their fields, so a Ph.D. in the field of interest isScientific journal editors must be able to read and understand the scientific literature in their fields, so a Ph.D. in the field of interest isscientific literature in their fields, so a Ph.D. in the field of interest is required.

I'm really excited about the idea of merging two of my interests, but I can't seem to find a lot of information online regarding the procedure involved in becoming a scientific journal editor.

A recent survey by the charity Sense About Science revealed that more than 1 in 3 editors of scientific or medical journals have refused material for fear of a libel suit.

Dr. Bruce Alberts, Editor - in - Chief of Science, Dr. Elias Zerhouni, Chief Scientific Adviser of AAAS's new journal Science Translational Medicine, and Dr. Ahmed Zewail were named to serve as the country's first science envoys as part of President Obama's U.S. Science Envoy Program.

On 25 February 2002, a group of prominent academic and industrial scientists, funders, and journal editors gathered at the National Academy of Sciences headquarters in Washington, D.C., to discuss the sharing of scientific data and materials.

The event initiated a dialogue on the topic in the community of peer - reviewed journal editors and led to guidelines on dealing with ghostwritten articles that are now embraced by many — though not all — scientific journals.

An article in The Chronicle of Higher Education points out that the editors - in - chief of two other prominent scientific publishers, Nature Publishing Group and Elsevier, declined to sign the letter, although they agreed that journal impact factors shouldn't be used to evaluate individual scientists.

Those activities are likely to remain the mainstay of the work scientific journal editors do, even as new technologies alter the job in significant ways.

Here, we describe the challenges and changing roles of science journal editors as they embrace digital technologies in their efforts to stay abreast of scientific trends and controversies.

Scientific vigilantes and editors of prestigious journals may exhibit too much crucifying zeal.

The book also urges researchers not to publish the same work in more than one journal or to slice it into several papers to increase their publication count, because doing so is an improper use of reviewers and editors» time and dilutes the value of the scientific literature.

Andrea Korte / AAAS Jeremy Berg, the new editor - in - chief of the Science family of journals, brings to his role what he calls an «eclectic scientific background...

Weil also serves as editor in chief of a two - year - old scientific journal, Integrative Medicine, which examines research on acupuncture, homeopathy, chiropractic therapies, and herbal remedies.

«Without publishing, [it is as if] you haven't done anything, because scientific articles are the most important measure of scientific achievement,» says Ana Marušić, editor - in - chief of the Croatian Medical Journal and president - elect of the Council of Science Editors.

Council of Science Editors, White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications.

The committee acknowledged that policing publications for research integrity was not the job of peer reviewers but noted that reviewers do sometimes bring possible instances of scientific misconduct to the attention of journal editors.

Last January a group of 32 editors and publishing officials, most from prominent life - science journals, met in Washington, D.C., to consider whether some scientific papers might be too dangerous to publish.

He has been involved with many journals in his field, serving as a founding editor and associate editor of Immunity, associate editor of Cell, and co-chief scientific advisor for Science Immunology.

«Progress in genomic research has already begun to transform modern medicine,» said Tracey DePellegrin, executive editor of G3, which, like its sister journal GENETICS also published by Genetics Society of America, promotes full data sharing and dissemination for scientific reseachers, «and this progress is contingent on scientists being able to access the genomic sequences, now available through dbGaP.

In an earlier report on 10 December, the The Times noted how Britain's libel laws were also influencing the decisions of scientific journals, quoting British Medical Journal Editor Fiona Godlee:

Prepared by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, it lays out the ethical standards that should govern scientific publication.

She is the guest editor of a new themed issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, the oldest scientific journal in the world, that focuses on an interdisciplinary approach to human evolution.

After all, it is typically an anonymous, volunteer effort for which scientists receive nothing more than thanks from journal editors and the good feeling of contributing to the scientific community.

With a tweet yesterday, an editor of Scientific Reports, one of Nature Publishing Group's (NPG's) open - access journals, has resigned in a very public protest of NPG's recent decision to allow authors to pay money to expedite peer review of their submitted papers.

Blessed be the editors of scientific journals who knew that no article is comprehensible, so they asked their writers to provide, à la Spaceballs, «the short, short version.»

But according to Michaels, most of these federal agencies lack even the most rudimentary tools that a medical journal editor would use to assess the quality and scientific integrity of industry - funded research.

May it serve as a warning not only to policymakers, but also to researchers, clinicians, peer reviewers, journal editors, and journalists of the need to consider the harm to scientific credibility and public health when dealing with studies funded by food companies with vested interests in the results — and to find better ways to fund such studies and to prevent, disclose and manage potentially conflicted interests,» writes Marion Nestle, Ph.D., M.P.H., of New York University, in a related commentary.

Bill is editor - in - chief of the journal Neuropsychopharmacology and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Autism Speaks.

In addition to serving on many editorial boards of scientific journals, he is currently the senior editor for Neuropsychiatric Genetics, a section of the American Journal of Medical Genetics and President of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

Editor in Chief of the journal Small GTPases, and on the editorial boards of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Molecular Medicine, PLoS One, Scientific Rjournal Small GTPases, and on the editorial boards of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Molecular Medicine, PLoS One, Scientific RJournal of Molecular Medicine, PLoS One, Scientific Reports.

Founder and chief executive editor of the international scientific journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP), www.atmos-chem-phys.net (since 2001).

He is, or has been, Associate Editor of different scientific journals including J. Immunol., AIDS and Frontiers.

Our clients include, amongst others, Chief Scientific Advisers; senior EU scientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research fScientific Advisers; senior EU scientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research fscientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research fscientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research facilities.

Results: A journal article showcasing results of lipidomics analyses for identifying novel biomarkers of diabetes conducted at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was selected as «Editor's Choice» by two clinical chemistry scientific journals.

In addition, the Editor - in - Chief of The Journal of Immunology will speak on how to avoid possible ethical missteps in scientific publishing.