Sentences with phrase «scientific policy committee»

Extracts from a paper by the CERN Scientific Policy Committee on the scientific significance of the possible exclusion regions of the Higgs

The Council is advised by a Scientific Policy Committee and a Finance Committee.

«It's a sad day for American science,» says Jerome Friedman, a Nobel - prizewinning physicist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a member of the SSC's scientific policy committee.

«There was no mismanagement of the supercollider,» says Steven Weinberg, Nobel - prizewinning physicist at the University of Texas at Austin, and a member of the SSC scientific policy committee.

Not exact matches

Councils, Committees and Working Groups — led by representatives of our member organizations — determine how to fulfill consumers» needs, help shape the association's policy positions, identify industry - wide model practices, direct scientific research and ensure strong and frequent collaboration among members and with retail trading partners.

However, the Committee's efforts went beyond its charge and authority to develop dietary recommendations based on scientific evidence by advocating for public policies such as taxes and restrictions on foods and beverages.

Ministers should not disguise policies based on their beliefs as being based on scientific evidence, the science and technology committee has said.

Al Teich, Director, AAAS Science and Policy Programs, testified before the House Science Committee on scientific and technical advice for Congress.

The project aimed to set up a network of Indian scientists and engineers to facilitate communication and increase their participation on committees and boards working on public science policy and minorities in science issues, as well as scientific peer review panels.

on Council Affairs Resolutions) Committee on Scientific Policy, 1947 Source Books, Committee on, 1946 - 1959 Committee on World Federation of Associations for the Advancement of Science, 1949 - 1956 Interim Committee on the Social Aspects of Science (including report), 1956 - 1958 Science in the Promotion of Human Welfare, 1973 - 1974 Science in the Promotion of Human Welfare, 1969 - 1972

[Box 14: T -4-5] Editorial Board (Committee), 1917 - 1943 Notes for Science (drafts submitted for publication), 1938 - 1941 Science, 1939 - 1945 Science Policy Committee, 1941 Science Service, 1926 - 1938 Science Service, 1939 - 1945 Science Service, 1935 - 1936, 1944 Scientific Monthly, 1937 - 1945 (2 Folders) Scientific Monthly Expenses, 1939 - 1942 Science and Scientific Monthly Orders, 1936 - 1940 Journals: Contracts and Correspondence, 1925 - 1943

Meeting, 1982 Meeting, 1983 Correspondence I, 1983 Correspondence II, 1983 Ad Hoc Committee on Support of Scientific Research Files (See: Committee on Federal Science Budget): I, 1972 - 1975 Ad Hoc Committee on Support of Scientific Research Files (See: Committee on Federal Science Budget): II, 1971 - 1972 Federal Science Budget, Ad Hoc Committee on (See: Committee on Support of Science Research) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy

According to a 2014 analysis by the National Committee of Scientific Research (CoNRS), which advises the CNRS on science policy issues and participates in the recruitment of young researchers, the CNRS alone has lost more than 800 permanent positions between 2002 and 2012.

In 1976, the AAAS Board and Council jointly created a permanent Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility to develop policies and procedures to protect scientists, engineers and health care professionals against infringements of scientific freedom and responsibility, to monitor policies and actions taken by governments that might affect their professional rights and duties, and to promote attention to scientific freedom and responsibility within AAAS, its affiliated societies, and the generScientific Freedom and Responsibility to develop policies and procedures to protect scientists, engineers and health care professionals against infringements of scientific freedom and responsibility, to monitor policies and actions taken by governments that might affect their professional rights and duties, and to promote attention to scientific freedom and responsibility within AAAS, its affiliated societies, and the generscientific freedom and responsibility, to monitor policies and actions taken by governments that might affect their professional rights and duties, and to promote attention to scientific freedom and responsibility within AAAS, its affiliated societies, and the generscientific freedom and responsibility within AAAS, its affiliated societies, and the general public.

Tee Guidotti, a physician in Washington DC and a member of the American Thoracic Society's Environmental Health Policy Committee, says that the scientific case for the proposed limit is «close to being bulletproof».

The hope is that such advisers will help keep the government «more honest» by pushing politicians to consider hard scientific evidence before passing new policies, says committee chair Phil Willis.

Congressional Fellows work on Capitol Hill for a year as legislative assistants to members of Congress or congressional committees, advising them on scientific issues while learning about the policy - making process.

Sometimes a government has to make policies based on, for example, societal reasons, says the committee, but it must clearly state the reasons if it rejects scientific advice.

His role today is to identify and analyze emerging science policy issues, offer scientific information and advice to parliamentarian select committees, stimulate debate, and anticipate how new science findings could impact policy.

More prestigious still are national and international committees formed to make policy recommendations or set long - term scientific strategy for scientific agencies.

He has testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on radiation portal monitors and has authored or coauthored over 160 scientific or policy - related publications.

COSCE's report sought to raise the alarm about the phenomenon, but the scientific community has long been aware that the numbers were deceptive, says Luis Sanz - Menéndez, director of the CSIC Institute of Public Goods and Policies in Madrid and chair of the Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Descientific community has long been aware that the numbers were deceptive, says Luis Sanz - Menéndez, director of the CSIC Institute of Public Goods and Policies in Madrid and chair of the Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DeScientific and Technological Policy of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

[Box 25] OIS correspondence, 1986 Foreign visitors, 1986 OIS staff meetings, 1986 OIS Committee on Arid Lands, 1986 China Exchange Program, 1986 Hewlett Packard project Interciencia Association Western Hemisphere Climate Program Denise Weiner PREP Meeting, April 1986 PREP, File «A» PREP, File «B» Science, Engineering and Diplomacy Fellows, 1986 Science Attache Programs Science Attache Seminars, File «A» Science Attache Seminars, announcements and invitations Science Attache, general Committee on Public Understanding of Science and Technology, 1986 National Science Week, Ben Franklin Lecture, 1986 National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists, 1986 Environmental Science and Engineering Fellows, 1986 Research and Development Budget and Policy Project, 1986 R and D Colloquium, 1986 Dean Wakefield Mass Media Science and Engineering Fellows, 1986 Mass Media Office of Opportunities in Science, 1986 Science, Technology and Education Committee on Arms Control and National Security, 1986 Program on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility, 1986

Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers National Academy of Engineering NAS, Government - University - Industry Research Roundtable NAS, Committee on International Relations NAS, Committee on Scholarly Communication with the People's Republic of China NAS, Committee on Science and Public Policy (COSPUP) National Academy of Science, National Research Council National Association of State Universities and Land - Grant Colleges (NASULGC) National Commission on Libraries and Information Science National Conference on the Advancement of Research (NCAR), Les Cook National Council of University Research Administrators National Engineering Action Council (NEAC) National Science Teachers Association National Society of Professional Engineers Science and Technology Political Action Committee Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society of North America, 1977 - 1979 Sigma Xi Parapsychological Association Phi Theta Kappa Power Engineering Society Social Science Research Council Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Society for Applied International Development State Academies of Science Union of Concerned Scientists United Community Centers, Brooklyn, New York

1974 Science Education News, Summer - Fall 1979, Spring - Summer 1980, Winter 1980 Officers and Activities 1959-1960 1961-1963 1964-1965 1966-1967 Officers, Organizations and Activities 1969-1970 1971-1972 1973-1974 1975-1976 1977-1978 1979-1980 1981-1983 1983-1984 & 1984 - 1985 «The Integrity of Science,» AAAS Committee on Science in Promotion of Human Welfare, American Scientist 53, June 1965 Out of School Programs in Science, Dec. 1981 Within Reach: Out of School Science Opportunities for Youth, Dec. 1981 Research and Development AAAS Report VII: Federal Budget FY 1983 Impact and Change Guide to Education in Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Jan. 1985 Congressional Action on R and D in the FY 1984 Budget, Office of Public Section Programs, Dec. 1983 Calendar of Scientific Meetings and Events, Office of Communications, 1985 The AAAS Science Book List, 1959 The AAAS Science Book List for Young Adults, 1964 Catalog: Periodicals, Book, Tapes and Reprints, 1977 - 1978 Directory of AAAS Fellows, 1979 Community Information Expositions, 1973 Guide to Scientific Instruments, 1978 - 1979 Guide to Scientific Instruments, 1980 - 1981

The Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPP) had been established in 1973; the AAAS - American Bar Association National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists had been established in 1974; the Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility (CSFR) had been established in 1976.

The committee has prepared a report that, in my view, provides policy makers and the scientific community with a critical view of surface temperature reconstructions and how they are evolving over time, as well as a good sense of how important our understanding of the paleoclimate temperature record is within the overall state of scientific knowledge on global climate change.

The scientific scope is aligned with, but not limited to, research challenges outlined in the Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (https://www.nsf.gov/geo/plr/arctic/iarpc/start.jsp) five - year plans.

Dr. Sugarman currently serves on the Scientific and Research Advisory Board for the Canadian Blood Service, the Ethics and Public Policy Committees of the International Society for Stem Cell Research, and the Board of Directors of PRIM&R (Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research).

James A. Edmonds • Member, IPCC Steering Committee on «New Integrated Scenarios» (2006 - present) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Framing Issues,» IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Global, Regional, and National Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Decision - Making Frameworks,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, Summary for Policy Makers, IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Energy Supply Mitigation Options,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Mitigation: Cross-Sectoral and Other Issues,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Estimating the Costs of Mitigating Greenhouse Gases,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «A Review of Mitigation Cost Studies,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: An Overview and Comparison of Approaches and Results,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report, Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios (1994) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report, Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (1992) • Major contributor, IPCC First Assessment Report, Working Group III, Response Strategies Working Group (1991).

Dan has authored over 50 scientific publications, is an inventor on more than 30 patents and serves as a member of the Vaccines Policy Advisory Committee for BIO, the world's largest biotechnology trade association.

Our aim is to ensure as far as possible that policies are based on the best possible scientific evidence, and so we encourage our scientists to contribute to key committees and policy making bodies nationally and internationally.

Dr. Diana Zuckerman, National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families, recommended that, in addition to focusing on the scientific issues, the Committee should focus on how to influence Americans» eating and exercise habits.

The committee says there is no scientific evidence that proves Rhee's policies caused that absenteeism to decline.

«Nothing happening at this conference» Professor Dr. William Alexander, emeritus of the University of Pretoria in South Africa and a former member of the United Nations Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, warned poor nations and their residents that the UN policies could mean more poverty and thus more death.

But if you take the same strategy and follow the reception of uncertainty through the media, such as the CBS broadcast on «Silent Spring,» and in the President's Science Advisory Committee policy documents, in Carson's testimony before Congress, and in the E.P.A.'s ban on DDT, you can witness the same strategy to assert ignorance and risk, and use visceral images to transform scientific uncertainty into a political certainty.

The Committee exists to ensure that Government policy and decision - making are based on good scientific and engineering advice and evidence.

«Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method,» House Committee on Science, Space, & Technology, March 29, 2017.

John Christy was a witness in a house committee hearing titled «Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method» chaired by Lamar Smith.

ON November 10 last year the Australian government's Multi-party Climate Change Committee (MCCC) received a scientific briefing before it entered the policy - setting mode that it remains in today.

Overall, after weighing the strengths and limitations of the traditional radiative forcing concept, the committee finds that its strengths warrant continued use in scientific investigations, climate change assessments, and policy applications.

Steve Eule of the Chamber of Commerce was a witness at a hearing to «examine the various scientific, economic and other policy issues» following the Paris Climate Agreement hosted by Lamar Smith's Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Among other positions, Prof. Dr. Nakicenovic is Member of the United Nations Secretary General High - Level Technical Group on Sustainable for Energy for All Initiative; Member of the Advisory Council of the German Government on Global Change (WBGU); Member of the International Council for Science (ICSU) Committee on Scientific Planning and Review; Co-Chair, Scientific Steering Committee of the Global Carbon Project (GCP); Member of the Board, Climate Change Centre Austria (CCCA); Member of the Working Group of the Austrian Panel on Climate Change (AG - APCC); Member of the Panel on Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Impact and Response Assessments; Member of the Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21) Steering Committee; Member of the International Advisory Board of the Helmholtz Programme on Technology, and Member of the Earth League.

Evidence generated through the Scientific Committee will inform the next Symposium aiming to strengthen families through Community Governance and the final Symposium will focus on Policy and Implementation.

Robert G. Santos, PhD, is the scientific director for the Healthy Child Manitoba Office (HCMO), in Winnipeg, Manitoba; senior policy advisor to the Healthy Child Committee of Cabinet (HCCC); and senior advisor to the deputy minister of healthy living, youth and seniors, in the government of Manitoba, where he has served since 1998.

Dr. Clark has been committed to conducting research to inform policy and practice and has been asked to serve on state and national scientific advisory committees including the Wisconsin Governor's Early Intervention Coordinating Council, the Lt. Governor's Task Force on Women and Depression, the Department of Health Services Maternal - Child Health Advisory Committee, the Wisconsin Task Force on Perinatal Mood Disorders, the National Institute of Mental Health Roundtable on Perinatal Depression and the NIMH Workgroup on Assessment of Infant / Toddler Mental Health.