Sentences with phrase «scientific review officer»
Dr. Barbara Thomas, NHGRI, serves as scientific review officer and executive director of the CIDR Board of Governors.
https://www.genome.gov/
Fungai Chanetsa, PhD is the Scientific Review Officer for the Kidney Nutrition, Obesity and Diabetes (KNOD) in the population Sciences and epidemiology Integrated review Group, Center for Scientific Review.
Scientific review officers for NIH's roughly 225 study sections select ECRs for their committees, which meet 3 times each year.
Several LRD steering committee members already had informally spoken with study - section scientific review officers to see if they were receptive to getting suggestions for lipid - centric reviewers.
Not exact matches
The scientific and technical disclosure in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Japan Gold's President & Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Mike Andrews, PhD, FAusIMM, who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43 - 101.
A full review of the Obama science policy legacy would have to cover many things, including scientific integrity, open data, STEM education, the creation of high - level positions like the Chief Technology Officer, and an embrace of climate science and the R&D tax credit.
The trouble began in May 2012 with the resignation of CPRIT Chief Scientific Officer Alfred Gilman, a Nobel Prize winner, over the agency's review procedures, and culminated in the resignation of two other top leaders.»
«Because the workload on the scientific community and NASA Program officers has increased substantially in the last decade with regard to proposal preparation, review, and implementation, the Planetary Science Division should consider consolidating programs to eliminate overlap as a part of the portfolio management strategy.»
The agency became embroiled in controversy last May when chief scientific officer and Nobel Prize winner Alfred Gilman quit in protest over CPRIT's scientific review processes.
NIH program officers, or program directors as they are sometimes called, serve as scientific liaison between the study section that reviews your grant and the institute that will hopefully be funding your work.
Last fall, CPRIT's chief scientific officer and many of its outside scientific reviewers resigned to protest what they saw as a failure to conduct proper peer review.
CPRIT's problems became public in May, when then - chief scientific officer Alfred Gilman, a Nobel Prize - winner, quit in protest over the agency's scientific review procedures.
«Enthusiasm can be the difference between two superb applications,» discloses T. J. Koerner, a scientific program director who, along with other officers and directors, coordinates all review activities at the American Cancer Society.
There is a referral officer who decides where it should be reviewed; a scientific review administrator who chairs the study section; and a program officer who represents the institute that may fund the project.
If the topic is selected by the SAB at their January meeting, the Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) will contact you in February or March and invite you to submit a detailed conference proposal for review by the SAB in June.
Anybody with an education in the sciences can tell when a credentialed charlatan is violating scientific method, «cherry - picking» data, manipulating computer simulations (climate models) to «draw the curve, then plot the points,» concealing his raw observational data sets from properly skeptical examiners, corrupting academic peer review (both to suppress the publication of colleagues» studies casting doubt upon the reviewing officers» pet hypotheses and to ensure that the submissions of «The Team» do not suffer impediments to publication), and concerting all these violations of professional ethical standards by way of back - room confabs and some of the most incredibly stupid e-mails this side of Enron's «Smartest Guys in the Room.»
Her research along with co-investigators Shannon Wanless, Applied Developmental Psychologist at University of Pittsburgh and Roger Weissberg, Distinguished Professor of Psychology and Education and Chief Knowledge Officer for the Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) has been accepted through scientific peer review for publication in the Fall / Winter Issue of The School Community Journal.