Scientific use of evidence would expose the flimsy nature of your association; for example, that to draw some line of association between Alex and Hillary is best explained by your own ideological orientation rather than anything inherent in who says «y ’ all»
Not exact matches
But California's new guidelines — and some
of the news coverage they have inspired — can make it seem like
using a cell phone carries far more risk than
scientific evidence suggests.
On Tuesday, TINA.org released the results
of its investigation, claiming that Goop markets some
of its own products (and promotes third - party products)
using «deceptive,» «illegal» health - related claims that aren't backed up by solid
scientific evidence.
However, Spicer then signaled that the White House sees recreational pot very differently, with the press secretary even attempting to link recreational
use of the drug to the abuse
of opioid drugs across the U.S. (In fact, there has been little
scientific evidence linking marijuana legalization to opioid
use, with some studies actually showing a decrease in opioid overdoses in states where legal marijuana is available.)
My flat - world comment was to point out the illogic
of believing something to be true without
evidence, and
using that belief to displace
scientific theories that do have supportive
evidence.
I
use the term theory as a well - established
scientific concept based on multiple lines
of evidence (as stated in a previous post).
Would any
of us respect the
scientific findings in any field if they
used emotional appeals to make their case, rather than
evidence?
Most
of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part
of discussions
of the supposed errors
of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts
of technical
scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece
of evidence, method
of dating or
use of data, while producing
evidences and counterarguments
of their own in favor
of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..
I have to
use logic and reason due to the utter lack
of empirical
scientific evidence to support the god claim.
Reason,
evidence,
scientific method — A commitment to the
use of critical reason, factual
evidence and
scientific method
of inquiry in seeking solutions to human problems and answers to important human questions.
You need to prove, or at least provide real
evidence (
scientific method, rules
of evidence), before we can move on to
using The Babble for anything more than fire starter or toilet paper.
@Timothy, I'm not sure what definition
of «Creationism» you are
using, but the article is mainly talking about Young Earth Creationism, which is inconsistent with the
scientific evidence available.
Can you prove
using the
scientific method or justice system's rules
of evidence that the
scientific method or justice system's rules
of evidence is the most reliable methods for knowing something?
Rachel Carson, who
used faulty
scientific evidence to decry «pesticide poisoning,» was the last
of the major environmentalists who did not present an overall scheme to rearrange American economic and political institutions.
A
scientific theory is simply meant to provide an explanation for some body
of natural phenomenon with the
use of what we have found - gathered
evidence, data, laws, hypothesis, facts in their explanation.
Unless, by
using the same logic, the fall
of Christian - based nations is «
scientific evidence»
of god's impotence.
In The Historian and the Believer, 57 Van A. Harvey
uses the metaphor
of judicial proceedings to illuminate the different relationships between
evidence, warrants, and conclusions involved in the «field - encompassing» discipline practiced by the modern
scientific historian.
The
scientific method argument could be
used against the M - Theory because some
of the required
evidence to prove the theory has no possible testing.
= > and your assumptions are far worse because you
use the hope
of discovery in multiverse whereas the
scientific community
uses known available
evidence.
You said, «and your assumptions are far worse because you
use the hope
of discovery in multiverse whereas the
scientific community
uses known available
evidence.»
In a food additive petition filed with the FDA, GMA said the
scientific evidence will enable FDA to find there is a «reasonable certainty
of no harm» from consumption
of PHOs from the
uses and
use levels specified in the submission.
ALDI Nord GmbH's Trader Joe's chain, The Kroger Co., and Whole Foods Market Inc. opted to shun selective food additives such as synthetic colors, preservatives, stabilizers, emulsifiers, and naturally occurring texturizers such as carrageenan (from seaweed) even though
scientific literature reported that rigorous double - blind studies have not found
evidence of these ingredients provoking true allergic reactions or health - or life - threatening reactions with prolonged
use.
The Court
of Appeals stated that there is no full
scientific evidence that will ascertain the safety
of the product, and that there is no single law that governs the study, introduction and
use of GMOs.
Nutrition Labelling — Update
of Scientific Evidence on Consumer
Use and Understanding
of Nutrition Labels and Claims.
Register - Mihalik recognized that «there is certainly potential for this type
of technology to have great implications in the identification
of concussion as the science advances,» but, she argued, «we need more
scientific and unbiased
evidence of their ability to detect concussion before they are widely
used and recommended in all settings.
found no
scientific evidence, or insufficient
evidence, to support the inclusion
of many
of the ingredients commonly
used in formulas.
If you ask for the reason
of such an article, maybe you should know that there are plenty
of supposed experts who would
use such a film, made by filmmakers and promoted by promotional people, as «
scientific evidence» to «educate» pregnant women and couples about the risks
of medicalized birth.
I enclose links below to
scientific evidence of studies into the beneficial effects
of using «whole milk fats» which contain naturally palmitic acid in the sn - 2 position and I also attach a
scientific paper from UC Davis and a paper from Dr Emma Derbyshire.
An extensive National Academy
of Sciences report previously found a lack
of scientific evidence that helmets and other protective devices designed for young athletes reduce concussion risk — yet some manufacturers continue to
use false advertising claims that prevent athletes, parents and coaches from making informed safety decisions.
I'd like to believe the American Chemistry Council, which says that «the overwhelming
scientific evidence supports the safety»
of BPA and that no foreign governments have restricted or banned its
use.
The FDA issued a ban on the
use of BPA in baby bottles in 2012, however, alarmists are claiming that other chemicals in plastic are just as harmful as BPA, but there is no
scientific evidence to back this up.
«The weight
of scientific evidence, as assessed by Health Canada and other agencies around the world, provides reassurance that consumers can continue to safely
use products made from bisphenol A,» said Steven G. Hentges
of the American Chemistry Council's Polycarbonate / BPA Global Group.
Indeed, there are over 40
uses of terms like «unclear,» «unknown,» «limited,» and «without
scientific basis» in the statement, which, while adequately reflecting the state
of an uncertain literature, do not support
evidence - based recommendations.
To clarify the current
evidence, additional research
using the rigorous
scientific methodology
of the randomized clinical trial will be necessary.
Some barriers include the negative attitudes
of women and their partners and family members, as well as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been
used to promote breastfeeding, such as setting standards for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support from the infant's father through active participation in the breastfeeding decision, together with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits
of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration
of breastfeeding in observational studies, 2,10 but
scientific evidence is not available as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.
Rush University Medical Center faculty and staff have been international leaders in conducting translational research to provide the
scientific evidence for the
use of mothers» own milk to reduce complications in very low birthweight infants infants during the NICU hospitalization.
[has] examined and reported on the
use of scientific evidence by government,» the letter reads.
These proposals may seem revolutionary, but they are based on a foundation
of solid
scientific evidence which has repeatedly shown they prevent overdoses and help people eventually cease the
use of heroin altogether, if they wish to.
AAAS Statement on EPA Administrator's Plan to Disallow
Use of Scientific Evidence in Decision - Making [April 20, 2018]
Working together, they will develop and test a variety
of learning experiences in which students
use online simulations to model energy - releasing and energy - requiring reactions, analyze and interpret data to make predictions about energy phenomena, and
use evidence from their own observations or from simplified versions
of scientific articles to explain phenomena and construct and critique arguments.
The Program is committed to assessing emerging legal issues related to science and technology, promoting the
use of scientific evidence in legal contexts, and providing expert assistance to the legal community through a variety
of projects and activities.
The news story, first reported by The Washington Post on the evening
of Dec. 15, set off a firestorm that the directive, which included barring the
use of «fetus,» «transgender,» «diversity,» «entitlement,» «vulnerable,» «science - based» and «
evidence - based» in budget documents, risks diminishing the value
of scientific advice in public policymaking, said the letter.
The American Association for the Advancement
of Science and other
scientific and engineering societies on Tuesday underscored the implication
of reports that staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were directed to avoid
using seven words, including «science - based» and «
evidence - based,» in federal budget documents.
Presented in the format
of a «mock trial,» the program was designed to investigate the relationship between neurological abnormalities and behavior, particularly criminal behavior; how
scientific evidence is admitted and examined in American courts; and how neuroscience
evidence and information may be
used in criminal trials.
About two thirds
of the states
use a combination
of barbituric, paralytic and toxic agents for executions, despite a lack
of scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness.
The multi-society letter called on the OMB to work with leaders
of government agencies to back the
use of the best
scientific evidence in their decision - making and to see that federal agencies support scientists doing the work required to «produce the knowledge upon which the nation relies.»
Communication Session: The Power and Perils
of the News Media in the
Use of Scientific Evidence 3:00 - 4:30 pm Room 312 (Hynes Convention Center)
They employed accusations
of scientific conspiracy, selective
use of evidence and dissenting scientists to contradict public health experts and confuse the public.
All these supports and promotion schemes for liquid biofuels should be scrapped, because
of overwhelming
scientific evidence that
using land to produce energy crops delivers no climate benefits at all once agricultural emissions and land -
use change are taken into account.
Her Web site, www.theflucase.com, is a mix
of scientific - sounding warnings and political broadsides; it points to «
evidence that an international corporate criminal syndicate, which has annexed high government office inside the United States, is intent on carrying out a mass genocide
using an artificial (genetic) flu pandemic virus and a forced vaccination program.»