Sentences with phrase «scientist article in question»

Each of these has a link to the New Scientist article in question.

Not exact matches

I was remiss in not including Brian Clark Howard's National Geographic article last Thursday in which scientists raised important questions about the new paper.

The climate scientist Simon Donner, who joined Gleick in signing a recent letter to The Wall Street Journal rebutting an op - ed article by other scientists questioning the seriousness of global warming, weighed in on the downside of lowering ethical thresholds in the name of a worthy mission:

The study also found that about 97 percent of all the comment articles published in the Herald Sun newspaper either rejected or questioned the views of the vast majority of climate scientists that human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause of climate change.

First it's; «momentum is building behind the controversial view that the numbers don't add up» then «A rising chorus of literature in the world's best scientific journals and most prestigious opinion pages has argued the climate change math is flawed» and «For climate scientists, irritating questions from «sceptics» about the «pause» have now become peer - reviewed papers...» which is the intro for Michael Asten as the first quote for the article.

I've read Annan's blog for years and honestly did not know the wife who was posting pictures and sewing garments was the scientist named Hargreaves who sometimes appears as a co-author with Annan until the article in question was posted.

Since Bookbinder is both currently a litigator in a set of global warming lawsuits against industries which supposedly paid «shill scientists» to lie, and was involved in a similar way back in 2010 as the Mother Jones article points out, those are relevant questions to ask.

While we don't necessarily share the Senator's view of the article on the whole (we felt it provided a relatively balanced discussion of the details and conclusions of the study in question), we do find some concern in the fact that the views of Myron Ebell (who actually works for the «Competitive Enterprise Institute», and not the more venerable «American Enterprise Institute» referred to by the Senator), were offered as a rebuttal to the conclusions of a team of respected scientists.

But it is curious that the No Scientist chose the headline Sceptical climate scientists concede Earth has warmed, and then goes on to quote a number of sceptics, each of whom seem to have told the article's author, Michael Marshall that the warming was never in question.

Correlations confirm that the more the German climate scientists talked with journalists and published articles in the media, the less they approved of discussing unresolved questions in public.