Sentences with phrase «scientists are interested in knowing»

Scientists are interested in knowing more about ice from the Eemian period, a time from 115,000 to 130,000 years ago that was about as warm as today.

Not exact matches

Most scientists are driven by intellectual curiosity and the desire to know, as much as by interest in practical applications.

But after a year in this lab, I decided that I was no longer interested in becoming a bench scientist.

Meanwhile, Lemaire suggests that scientists who want to make the jump to industry — in France and elsewhere — get to know the sector by talking to people in R&D departments they might be interested in.

«I used to be a scientist so I was interested in research and I wanted to know if this trial would be of benefit to me and to patients in the future.

In either model, what's interesting is that scientists have identified a likely culprit, a stress - related hormone known to do bad things to the hippocampus and memory under other circumstances.

Up to 98 percent of human genomic matter is known as «junk» or «dark matter» non-coding DNA, and had for years attracted little interest among scientists who doubted its role in human health and disease.

«Now we know the genome of one individual, which the scientists named Sally, but we are more interested in understanding the variations between individuals.

The study, published in Nov. 2017 in Agronomy Journal, was the brainchild of the late Don Tyler, a renown UTIA soil scientist, who was interested in how no - till and cover crops may help reduce erosion.

Scientists are interested in understanding early life on Earth because if we ever hope to find life on other worlds - especially icy worlds with subsurface oceans such as Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's Enceladus - we need to know what chemical signatures to look for.

Scientists are interested in understanding early life on Earth because if we ever hope to find life on other worlds — especially icy worlds with subsurface oceans such as Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's Enceladus — we need to know what chemical signatures to look for.

«Scientists were not interested in figuring out what kind of device had detonated, because they already knew that,» says analytical chemist Michael Kristo, a nuclear forensics expert at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.

But the stricken details may still be made available to influenza scientists who have a legitimate interest in knowing them under a new system the journals and U.S. government officials have been actively debating for some time.

As is the growing interest among Western scientists in the medicinal properties of many reef species, which of course native communities knew about long ago.

It is interesting to know that «recently, scientists came across a lucky find: a trove of 6,000 - year - old barley seeds sealed in a cave near the Dead Sea.

New Scientist Connect gives you the chance to meet like - minded people who share similar interests to you — whether you're looking for love, or just to meet someone on the same wavelength, no matter where you are in the world.

Scientists were interested in a bacterial disease in Nigerian cattle known as «blackleg disease,» caused by the bacteria Clostridium chauvoei.

The game centres around scientist Dr. Splorchy, who evidently has no interest in what we say here, as in his own words, his experience with VR is «so beyond the capability of your understanding that if I were to try to explain them to your primitive earth mind I would have to rip out most of your brain and replace it with a computer so powerful it hasn't even been invented yet, so no, I will not send you a blurb for your stupid press release.»

The conflict here may be mostly the result of some very wealthy business interests who have a hidden agenda on this issue, and they are known to be spending a lot of money to confuse this issue in any way they can, often by involving a small number of otherwise fine scientists and others to spread doubt on their behalf.

I propose a sociological proposition: there are many retired scientists who are skeptical about global warming theory because they no longer have a vested interest in the outcome of any research.

It's also interesting to note that climate scientists have known for at least three decades that short - term fluctuations in temperature (e.g., those associated with the ENSO cycle) are correlated with short - term fluctuations in the rate of increase of atmospheric CO2 (Bacastow and Keeling 1981).

He took an interest in research by Exxon and outside scientists into the «greenhouse effect,» as climate change was then known.

I'd accuse so - called amateur scientists like Willis Eschenbach and Nic Lewis of not being particularly interested in knowing what climate sensitivity is.

I'd be very interested to know what your opinion is of scientists being what is, in my opinion, simply dishonest.

Perhaps I have an advantage over scientists and others who are interested in this field of research: I grew up in west Texas and I know horse dung when I see it.

* blush * I'd also be very interested to know what proper scientists think about the material on ocean circulation in the same article.

Its interesting to know that where John Cristy was an outright denier (so to speak) for many years he now accepts ACC / AGW but only attributes 25 % of the temperature rises to humans and the rest from natural variability and / or other factors (probably the sun) for which he states that upto 30 % of climte scientists are with him in being skeptical of CC human causes

They knew much of the landscape of uncertainty and they went ahead and said 95 % surety when any scientist or even layman with a modicum of interest in the subject could see that was completely ridiculous assertion.

The problem that I have met on several occasions is that he presents directly or implies claims of errors in main stream science while the only error is that he is missing some essential points well known to every competent atmospheric scientists and often obvious also to me as a physicist who has learned about atmosphere of own interest after retiring.

All climate scientists junking the null hypothesis are piltdown man makers, the missing no longer link between real scientists and all conmen using language to obfuscate in support of vested interests, their own.