Sentences with phrase «scientists give this kind»

Not exact matches

This disconnect has been misused for years as some kind of claim that even among scientists there is some debate, when scientists are given the benefit of the doubt anyways.

As for secular scientists, Stark surmises that they «now take as a given and very frequently don't know the origin of the kinds of principles that people like Newton and Copernicus and others took from Christian theology.

Biello: A lot of scientists that I've spoken to think we have no chance of meeting 450 ppm given that we haven't done hardly anything to change our course and there are other scientists who say that we have already well past kind of the safe point for concentration of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

In these essays he urges us not to neglect our duty to the young and to be kind to the Russians, some of whose established scientists, I understand, have not been paid for months: one, it was reported, was recently given a tea set in lieu of a salary — the value to be deducted from his next pay cheque.

«Looking at the Saturn system when it is backlit by the sun gives scientists a kind of inside - out view of Saturn that we don't normally see,» said Matt Hedman, a participating scientist based at the University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.

«The data at hand give no indication of the kind of earnings premiums for scientists and engineers that would signal the existence of a shortage,» he said about a comparison of lifetime earnings for S&E Ph.D. s and those with professional degrees.

The consultant there also suggested that I gain business experience, but as a bench scientist, I lack opportunities to do so.Should I give up my job as a postdoc and go for an MBA, or look for any kind of job that could give me the experience I need?

By studying the brains of adult birds, scientists may discover the cells that give birth to different kinds of neurons and the growth factors that nurture them.

Giving cars the kind of social intelligence displayed by Jibo, a robot designed for domestic use (New Scientist, 19 July 2014, p 21) could help them navigate our world safely.

The scientist is frank about his own fascination for pulsars, a kind of cosmic object discovered some fifty years ago, whose first observers speculated that it could be of extraterrestrial origin — only half in jest, they gave it the initials LGM, standing for «little green men.»

Knowing how silica interacts in given conditions such as temperature, salinity and alkalinity, the scientists could work backward to determine what kind of environment creates these unusual particles.

Dr. Lindsey Berkson: One of my specialties is breast cancer because DES daughters, Dartmouth proved this with a longitudinal trial and the scientist who was the head of that was kind of enough to give me a really beautiful comment on that book Safe Hormones, Smart Women, 85 % many women who were exposed to this powerful estrogen in the womb got breast cancer by age 45.

To many climate scientists who've also tracked emissions trends, circling toward this kind of geo - engineering is almost unavoidable given the scope of the physical challenge of reducing the atmosphere's carbon dioxide concentration in the wake of humanity's 21st - century crest in fossil fuel use.

Some scientists there told me that Dr. Glantz's little team was always kind of a bad fit, given the main focus of the lab on physical sciences, and particularly on refining giant simulations run on supercomputers to try to mimic the interrelated workings of the planet's atmosphere, oceans, and frozen zones.

Given that uncertainty, I'd far rather see scientists produce 50 - year limits, 100 - yr limits, 150 - yr limits, 250 - yr limits — those are the kinds of predictions that would be interesting, as they would give you an idea of how fast the approach to equilibrium might be.

So I can preferentially fund those scientists who give me the kind of answers I need to support my agenda of imposing a carbon tax.

Imagine the outrage and credibility gap if Big Oil gave that kind of money to scientists who question the «dangerous manmade climate change» mantra.

Particularly given that one complaint offered by «skeptics» is that «realist» climates scientists refuse to debate the science (with the resulting conclusion drawn by «skeptics» that the refusal to debate is some kind of protective measure against having to acknowledge error).

Our nation's leading climate scientists have told us it's dangerous folly, and all the recent Nobel peace laureates have urged us to set a different kind of example for the world... but given the amount of money on the other side, we've had to spend our bodies — and we'll probably have to spend them again.»

Congratulations on giving readers here a perfect example of why real scientists often shy away from engaging with this kind of mentality.