Sentences with phrase «score is the gold standard»

Citation scores are the gold standard for measuring scientific impact only because the scientific community at large has elevated them to this position.

The Hospital Safety Score is the gold standard rating for patient safety, compiled under the guidance of the nation's leading patient safety experts and administered by The Leapfrog Group, the first and only hospital safety rating to be peer - reviewed in the Journal of Patient Safety.

While NAEP, the Nation's Report Card, scores are the gold standard for measuring student achievement and serve as a yardstick for state comparisons, NAEP results are generally not known by students and their families, who rely on their state test results to know how they are performing.

A number of companies, including Equifax (NYSE: EFX) create these scores, but Fair Isaac's (NYSE: FICO) FICO score is the gold standard that's used by most lenders to decide whether or not to loan someone money, and how much to charge that person in interest.

The 820 credit score is the gold standard if you're applying for a mortgage or any other loan.

Issued by Fair Isaac Co., FICO scores are the gold standard of credit scores, and are most often used to gauge your creditworthiness.

Not exact matches

So far, Wall Street has not reacted to the uncertainty over the current vote, despite announcements last week that Moody's Investor Service and Standard & Poor's were considering downgrading the nation's gold - plated credit score.

Because many lenders and loan establishments use FICO, they are considered the gold standard of credit scores.

Many scores have been developed to assess frailty and to make predictions on disease and mortality, but there is no gold standard.

When the College Board announced, in the summer of 2002, that it would stop «flagging» the test scores of students who were given special accommodations for the SAT, the gold standard exam for college admission, disability advocates were thrilled.

Scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the gold standard in measuring educational achievement, inched up slightly through the Bush administration, but NCLB was far from a magic bullet.

The Tennessee STAR experiment, which is considered the gold standard for class size research, found that math and reading scores improved for all students when they were assigned to smaller classes.

This is usually done by comparing scores on the new assessment with ones on an established and accepted as a «gold standard» measure.

It is usually backed by citing data showing that scores on the gold - standard National Assessment of Educational Progress have remained essentially flat since the 1970s, even though state education spending grew.

Both the AERA and ASA statements offer a needed corrective, by pointing out the path that must be traversed before an indicator based on VAM scores approaches the status of a gold standard.

Morgan Polikoff, assistant professor at the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California, thinks PARCC might also face a battle in Maryland, after the state was the only one to see falling scores on all four National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tests — which are considered the gold - standard for student standardized tests.

But the singular danger with VAM scores, being the outcome of a sophisticated statistical procedure, is that they are seen by many as providing a gold standard against which other indicators should be judged.

NAEP, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is the gold standard in education research: the only exam overseen by the federal government and adminstered to a random selection of schoolchildren annually, with no rewards or punishments attached to corrupt the scores.

For the corporate reform crowd, student test scores are the «gold standard,» the coin of the realm, the ne plus ultra of accountability measures.

This is the Gold Standard for credit scores.

Hopefully you're familiar with what many consider the gold standard of credit scores, FICO.

Conclusion — No significant difference in outcome as determined by ground reaction forces (the gold standard in determining this — foot pressure on a plate) or radiographic OA scores were found between dogs with CrCL injury treated with LFS (extra-cap) or TPLO.