I suspect this pastor isn't teaching Jesus» truth book by book
scripture by scripture.
If you believe that the whole Bible is God's word, and that it contains no contradictions, that necessarily implies that interpreting
the Scriptures by the Scriptures is an infallible rule of interpretation.
Not exact matches
By contrast, she writes, King «situated the civil rights movement within the broader landscape of history — time past, present, and future — and within the timeless vistas of
Scripture.»
The other part of me also knows that if you do believe
by Scripture, tradition and your own internal barometer that homosexuality is a sin (let's say), then you are not going to wish to give the thumbs up to someone being on staff who is openly living that lifestyle.
The «perspicuity» of
scripture is asserted
by any commentator I am willing to hear out.
Listen, there will be those who will disagree, but I encourage you to go
by the
scriptures.
The
scripture that they are referencing is completely misunderstood
by the Mormons.
Beware any
scripture quoted
by a Mormon.
The institutional church is so often like Satan... longing to be worshipped and obeyed; teaching that obedience to one
scripture is more important than balancing them all; luring us to abuse our power to make a difficult path chosen
by God into a simple solution of no new spiritual growth (Matt 4).
Then, even though they may apply cultural references to other
scripture, they refuse to acknowledge (or at least look at some unbiased research) that loving committed gay or lesbian relationships today do not resemble the types of homosexuality referenced
by Paul in Romans or 1 Corinthians.
2 Timothy 3:16 — «All
Scripture is inspired
by God («Theopneustos» God breathed, literally), and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.»
However, Church officials have responded, saying: «The objectives of the Shared Conversations on Sexuality,
Scripture and Mission were set out in June 2014
by the Bishop of Sheffield in GS Misc 1083.
Meanwhile, the believers have to follow the moralistic codes based on tradition and
scripture lest they may become a «bad witness» to the truth of redemption
by Jesus the Christ.
You said
Scriptures are hard to come
by that speak about Jesus dying for our sins.
As far as it being condemned
by God, you can see some of my earlier posts where we talked about there being legitimate theological interpretations of
Scripture that allow for loving, committed gay relationships.
It suggests that there are four criterion
by which we come to a conclusion;
Scripture, reason, tradition and experience.
if you really want to understand why, read the entire text that was quoted
by One One in the context that leads up to those
scriptures.
The Bible teaches that to truly believe in and trust God means to trust in His Word, and all
scripture is inspired
by God, so all
scripture comes from him (2 Timothy 3:16).
Semitic languages are so rich with layers of metaphor and allusion that we can't possibly understand their picture of God
by reading the
scriptures in English.
If you really go down the list looking at every word and the heart behind it in light of
scripture and in the light of the law of the Spirit of life you'll find major discrepancies and see how carnal, worldly and unbiblical those points of views really are... I'm concerned about the heart behind such views because it isn't one of a disciple (one who emulates their rabbi and is possessed
by the «Holy» Spirit of God).
The ELCA is a large and diverse community (currently twice the size of the LCMS) that has chosen to interpret
Scripture to allow for the inclusion of many previously marginalized
by the church.
I didn't prove anything
by expressing my understanding of
Scripture, just as you don't prove anything
by expressing yours.
[57:25] We sent our messengers supported
by clear proofs, and we sent down to them the
scripture and the law, that the people may uphold justice.
I think Christians, in general, don't know jack squat about the gay lifestyle / community nor do they really take the time to understand... their
scripture says this and that's all they need (blatant ignorance — but that's life)... even those
scriptures are up for contention as noted earlier
by Trey.
So,
by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or
scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired
by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
By the evidence of the
scripture (if you were to actually study it instead of making broad assumptions about it based on what you read somewhere else) God set this earth in motion.
Since young adults perceive evangelical Christianity to be... «unconcerned with social justice», it's a shame that more evangelical churches don't know about the Just Faith program, which provides «opportunities for individuals to study and be formed
by the justice tradition articulated
by the
Scriptures, the Church's historical witness, theological inquiry and Church social teaching» (from jusfaith.org/programs).
But I believe that we are to not give in to our every urge, and to do our best to live
by the laws governing society and those laid out for us in Holy
Scripture.
A believers motivation is high and shaped
by a strong sense of purpose in life, their motivation is rooted in the
scriptures as evidenced
by those high performers.
There are great banquets and richly decorated temples in
Scripture, as well as kings anointed
by prophets.
That is not to say we should not take the journey for ourselves; it simply means that there are maps drawn
by those who have gone before — from the saints in
Scripture to the Fathers of the Church.
but I am pointing out that the idea that Jesus and Paul were somehow unhappy with the Jewish religion and thought they were bringing a «new» covenant is not backed up
by scripture.
Horus not all christians live
by certain christain
scriptures because I myself try everyday to live
by all of GOD»S Laws, so not all christians do thank you
She seeks instead to highlight that the breadth of
scripture suggests that a breadth of interpretations can be welcomed and affirmed
by the Christian church.
There are nonessential (adiaphora) issues that are neither required nor prohibited
by scripture.
TORAH TORAH TORAH > YHWH YHWH YHWH < HAROT HAROT HAROT you get the picture This CAN NOT be done
by any man and still retain the meaning of
scripture / or the text in which it is written.
It is one thing to offend
by speaking truth, that'll happen, but any other type of offence is unnecessary and against the teachings (which show God's heart on the matter) in
scripture for those who claim to «know Him».
People who murder their own children in order to enable their promiscuous lifestyle are not being led to do that
by the Holy Spirit, regardless if what they are doing is not explicitly forbidden in the
Scriptures.
Steve Finnell, you seem to be most offended
by anything in the history of the church with the exception of the Holy
Scriptures.
The
scriptures point out that only a few of us should seek to be pastors as we will be judged
by a higher standard.
We seen clearly in
scripture that His love is not expressed
by giving people resources or eliminating day to day problems or health problems from their life.
During these same years, Luther set forth what later scholars have referred to as the formal and material principles of the Reformation, namely, the supremacy of Holy
Scripture and justification
by faith alone.
Even though the
scripture uses some aspects of ancient mil life to help us understand spiritual truths, the mil life and church life are not a perfect analogy or paradigm
by which to judge the other.
I don't know why folks don't want to understand that discoveries
by scientists do prove the
scriptures in the Bible to be true.
Scripture is not, for Wycliffe, an inert text that must be brought
by interpretation into accord with theological positions.
Cherry picking
scripture is a good example, you had a point you wanted to make, which is refuted merely
by providing the entire context.
Catholics, in turn, teach that the Magisterium exercised
by the successors of the apostles — which they believe is intended
by Christ, is guided
by the Holy Spirit, and is in clear continuity with the orthodox tradition — enables the Church to explicate the truth of Holy
Scripture obediently and accurately.
The next question taken up
by ECT participants was the relationship between
Scripture and tradition.
Believers who read these stories aren't going to be swayed
by such things any more than you will
by the quoting of
Scripture (since you've already said that you believe it to be a book of made up stories).
«polygamy is written about in the earlier days of the old testament to show how people were living then, but it was not condoned and encouraged
by scripture.»