Having grown up «unchuched» many of my interpretations of
Scripture do not conform to ecclesiastical norms.
Precisely when and exactly through what process this consummation is to be reached the writers of
Scripture do not specify in terms which the historian can pin down to exact details.
As has been pointed out many people disagree, using the same
scripture you do.
The scripture do tell us that he will be from the «seed» of David, YHWHs chosen, and that he will come out of Judah (Yhwhudah), in Micah 5:1,2.
As for quoting scripture don't forget Lucifer knows is scripture well but is obviously not a good christian.
But those who hold to one of these alternate ways of reading Scripture don't necessarily believe the Bible has errors; they just have a different way of reading and understanding the text.
What passage of
Scripture do you recommend I dwell on?
I bet if you took all those people who want to beat the US over the head with scripture don't know much about it.
Well, which
scripture do I have to read to make it sunny and 75 in the upper midwest all winter long?
Interestingly, not once in
Scripture do we find the Father addressing the Son as «my God.»)
The authors of
Scripture do not always speak with one voice, but this is because they are presenting the question of the character of God in different ways.
Also, nowhere in
Scripture do we read that this is eternal weeping and everlasting regret.
In appealing to the whole of
Scripture I do not imagine either that the text is uniformly doctrinalist or that it assumes a simple unity of texture and emphasis.
1) what
scripture do you cite to support the claim that Jesus was never married?
@Chad (not the one that started the thread) «What
scripture do you cite to support that claim that s ex is a sin?»
No where in
Scripture do we find to get a whole chain of people praying and then God will listen.
Which story of a woman in
Scripture do you find most liberating and why?
Secondly, nowhere in
Scripture do we ever find the term «The Unpardonable Sin.»
Quoting
scripture does nothing for your cause.
Then again,
the scripture does say no one can come to the Father unless He enables them.
However, that
scripture does not state that when one returns to dust that they will forever remain dust.
But though we can not claim to know for sure, what we do know from
scripture does bode well for Judas» eternal destiny.
Please tell me why slavery (as just one example) in
scripture does not receive the same treatment that you give to the patriarchal model presented in scripture.
Scripture does do something to us in worship, which is why it is a scandal that Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican and other traditions have more public reading of Scripture in their services than we Bible - oriented evangelical Protestants.
Christian scripture doesn't have teachings like this toward other contemporary religions.
And where in
scripture does it say anything about who is «allowed» to read the Gospels?
Nowhere in Jewish
scripture does it say that the Messiah is to die for the sins of the world, and nowhere in Jewish scripture are Moses» laws nullified or «completed.
NOw
scripture does say that faith without works is dead.
They seem to think being a pastor means the ten commandments and Bible scripture doesn't applies to them.
Others believe Scripture doesn't precisely disallow it, but feel it's best in today's society to abstain.
awanderingscot «
scripture does not teach evolution.
And then
Scripture does point to Christ as the Savior.
There are however, many behaviors that
scripture DOES tell us is sinful.
In one place, he writes, It is correct for us to say that
Scripture does -LSB-...]
the scriptures do not claim as you state «infallible word of God» ------ Well, this is something I've been hearing for years, in church from pastors and in person from christians.
It is completely incorrect to say that
Scripture does not tell us why the church should meet together.
Scripture does not teach that a Christian can be possessed by a demon.
What
scriptures did you think He was talking about?
While Scripture doesn't say Christians can be possessed it also doesn't say they can't.
It is my conviction that
Scripture does not so much reveal God to us as it reveals us to us.
That's a posture one can carry in a patriarchal culture or an egalitarian one, so faithfulness to
Scripture does not require an embrace of patriarchy.
It's a little frustrating that he shows them, yet scripture doesn't give us the content of his interpretation — solid words, a revised script.
Scripture does this often.
So if I understand you correctly you are declaring something sinful which
scripture does not... you sidestep the request to prove your assertion... and yet you accuse me of not being able prove my position.
Ramban responds: «
Scripture does not forbid weeping, for nature arouses weeping at the parting of lovers and their separation even in life.»
Why do I think
the Scriptures do not record Jesus addressing homosexuality and homosexual marriage?
Besides, we Christians need to stop being shocked and ashamed of things that which Scripture doesn't shy away from.
But what
Scripture does provide, it provides amazingly well, if we can learn to read it properly.
(TCUJ concluded that Ohene agrees with Catalano's view that
Scripture does not prohibit homosexual practice.)
Before you answer too quickly, realize that while
Scripture does not support the idea that love is just a feeling, Scripture also may not support the idea that love consists of loving actions (with or without the feeling).