Over the centuries Christians have used two disciplines for covering
Scripture in a systematic way.
Not exact matches
Three: If these essays are written to deepen process theology as a mode of
systematic theology on the supposition that a theology is truncated if its rootage
in Scripture is not clear, then it is crucial to be clear —
in ways in which these essays do not make it clear — how process hermeneutics warrants any judgments about what is normative for Christian theology.
A true pastor - teacher is one who knows the primary
way of feeding and caring for his flock is through faithful and
systematic teaching of
Scripture, while at the same time, the teaching of
Scripture is not an end
in itself which is solely an academic pursuit, but is for the purpose of loving and caring for other people.
Although they cite the Baptist theologian Timothy George
in a
way that shows his awareness of the ground - breaking work of the World Conference on Faith and Order at Montreal
in 1963 on «
Scripture, Tradition, and traditions,» Noll and Nystrom make no
systematic use of his insights; they also neglect to note the phraseology of Pope John Paul II when he called for further study on «the relationship between Sacred
Scripture as the highest authority
in matters of faith and Sacred Tradition as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God» (Ut Unum Sint, 79)» a formulation that I think may hold the best promise of resolving the question since the sixteenth century.
Further,
in the same
way that the church has wrestled with its understanding of Christ and the
Scripture through creeds, commentaries,
systematic theologies, and the like, so also the church has developed
ways to do its worship.