These sins get much more attention in
Scripture than homosexuality.
Not exact matches
But whereas Justin was eventually able to reconcile his sexuality with his faith and with
Scripture in such a way that has left open the possibility for a relationship with a man in his future, Wesley says that «my own story, by contrast, is a story of feeling spiritually hindered rather
than helped by my
homosexuality.
To read
homosexuality into Sodom or Gibeah reveals more about the reader
than it does about the
scripture.
Pride, anger, greed, judgmentalism, and gluttony, for example, are condemned all over the place in
Scripture (way more
than homosexuality), and yet most Christians are content to live in such destructive lifestyles while they point the finger at homosexuals and call down God's curses upon them.
Likewise, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s changes to its policy took place over a much longer time
than Azumah names, involved persons holding many positions left undescribed, and came about not because the denomination chose to ignore the
Scriptures but because over time, many of us became convinced that there are theologically and historically faithful ways of reading the
Scriptures that find space for contemporary understandings of
homosexuality.
I am more
than happy to have a discussion about
homosexuality AFTER we all take care of the issues that
Scripture seems most concerned with.
All I was saying was that IF you think it is a sin, we should still love and accept LGBT people, just as we love and accept people who lie, eat too much, drink too much, are lazy, are proud, etc, all of which are clearly sins (and are talked about in
Scripture way more
than homosexuality).
Only a little more
than a century ago, many of the very same passages now being invoked to argue that the
scriptures label
homosexuality a sin or that God can not countenance gay marriage were used to justify not «biblical marriage» but slavery.