Sea ice minimum levels are falling at the rate of 14 % a decade in the Arctic, and polar bears have been feeling the loss.
Not exact matches
Current
ice extent is well below
levels at the same point in 2012, which went on to set the current record for the lowest
sea ice minimum extent:
In contrast, the much more expansive
ice volume maxima (equivalently,
sea level minima) during a glacial maximum is more defined.
NASA satellite data reveals how this year's
minimum sea ice extent, reached on Sept. 9 as depicted here, declined to a
level far smaller than the 30 - year average (in yellow) and opened up Northwest Passage shipping lanes (in red).
And remember, the satellite data are one small part of a vast amount of data that overwhelmingly show our planet is warming up: retreating glaciers, huge amounts of
ice melting at both poles, the «death spiral» of arctic
ice every year at the summer
minimum over time, earlier annual starts of warm weather and later starts of cold weather, warming oceans, rising
sea levels, ocean acidification, more extreme weather, changing weather patterns overall, earlier snow melts, and lower snow cover in the spring...
Total
sea ice extent for the previous three months was near or below the
level of 2007, the year with the lowest
minimum summer
ice extent during the satellite record.
In September 2007
sea ice extent reached its lowest
level since the satellite record began in 1979; the monthly extent, 4.28 × 106 square kilometers, surpassed the previous
sea ice minimum record (set in 2005) by 1.28 × 106 square kilometers [Stroeve et al., 2008].
We should also not forget that back in 2005,
minimum sea ice levels like we've seen since 2007 (3 - 5 mkm2) were not predicted to occur until 2040 - 2070.
Depending on how the weather plays out over the next few weeks, that
minimum is likely to fall somewhere between second and fifth place, they estimate — still a remarkably low
level that shows how precipitously
sea ice has declined in recent decades.
Actually Fielding's use of that graph is quite informative of how denialist arguments are framed — the selected bit of a selected graph (and don't mention the fastest warming region on the planet being left out of that data set), or the complete passing over of short term variability vs longer term trends, or the other measures and indicators of climate change from ocean heat content and
sea levels to changes in
ice sheets and
minimum sea ice levels, or the passing over of issues like lag time between emissions and effects on temperatures... etc..
For example, additional evidence of a warming trend can be found in the dramatic decrease in the extent of Arctic
sea ice at its summer
minimum (which occurs in September), decrease in spring snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere, increases in the global average upper ocean (upper 700 m or 2300 feet) heat content (shown relative to the 1955 — 2006 average), and in
sea -
level rise.
CO2
minima were reached approximately when the
sea level was at a
minimum, hence, the extent of the continental
ice sheets were at a maximum, and the highest CO2
levels were found during interglacials during the high stands of the
sea level.
When these melt at a
minimum the portion of the
ice above
sea level contributes to
sea level rise.
The paper questioned whether climate change was dangerous for polar bears and whether the region was warming at all, even as NASA reported that the 2007
minimum sea ice levels were at an all - time low, falling to nearly 40 percent below the 1979 - 2000 average.