Not exact matches
In contrast, the actual science shows something quite different: though summer
sea ice since 2007 has declined to levels not predicted until 2040 - 2070, there has been virtually no negative impact on
polar bear health or survival, a result no one predicted back in 2005.
Once you presuppose that climate change is happening, it doesn't take a leap of faith to incorporate the assumption into models to estimate the
health of
polar bear populations, the progress of glaciers, and the vulnerability of Arctic
sea ice.
Relative to recent years and potential impacts on
polar bear health and survival in Canada, there is nothing alarming in the pattern or speed of
sea ice breakup for 2017, either over Hudson Bay, the southern Beaufort, or the eastern high Arctic.
Tagged Arctic, climate change, global warming,
health, maximum, melting, NASA,
polar bear,
sea ice, survival, warm, winter
Due to hypotheses regards future effects of increasing CO2 on
sea ice and
polar bear health, CBD argued
polar bears were endangered.
Sea ice is absolutely critical to the
health of
polar bears.
Research there has shown a direct link between the loss of
sea ice and the
health of
polar bears, including a connection between an earlier spring melting of
sea ice and lower survival rates for cubs.
• As far as is known, the record low extent of
sea ice in March 2017 had no impact on
polar bear health or survival.
There is no evidence that slightly less winter
sea ice than the average since 1979 has had any negative impact on
polar bear health or survival: the difference is simply not biologically meaningful...