Sentences with phrase «secretary appealed this judgment»

Not exact matches

The Supreme Court has fixed Feb. 9 to deliver judgment on appeals of no - case - submissions brought to it by the former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh.

The judgments of the Court of Appeal in Rowley v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2007] EWCA Civ 598, [2007] All ER (D) 186 (Jun) can be seen in much the same way.

This post critically analyses the Court of Appeal's judgment in Tom Watson and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department with regards to general data retention, access to communications data on the basis of prior review by a court or an independent administrative body and notifications.

By a simple majority, the House of Lords dismissed the secretary of state's appeal (Lord Bingham, Baroness Hale, Lord Brown, with dissenting judgments from Lords Hoffmann and Carswell).

In Noel Douglas Conway v The Secretary of State for Justice [2018] EWCA Civ 16, the Court of Appeal gave an unusually detailed judgment granting permission to appeal against the decision of the Divisional Court in Conway, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 640, refusing permission for the applicant to judicially review the criminalisation of physician - assisted suicide under the Suicide ActAppeal gave an unusually detailed judgment granting permission to appeal against the decision of the Divisional Court in Conway, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 640, refusing permission for the applicant to judicially review the criminalisation of physician - assisted suicide under the Suicide Actappeal against the decision of the Divisional Court in Conway, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 640, refusing permission for the applicant to judicially review the criminalisation of physician - assisted suicide under the Suicide Act 1961.

Today, in the case of Secretary of State for Justice v. Windle and Arada [2016] EWCA Civ 459, the Court of Appeal (Underhill LJ giving judgment) decided...

The Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Low) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] 2 C.M.L.R. 34 [2010] I.C.R. 755 [2010] EWCA Civ 4 has given an important judgment holding that companies established in the European Union can not rely on the free movement of services provisions in Article 56 -LSB-...]

On 30 November 2016 the Court of Appeal (Lewison LJ, Beatson LJ, Sir Stephen Richards) handed down judgment in R (British American Tobacco and others) v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWCA Civ 1182.

The guidelines for PCOs were initially set out in Dyson J's judgment in CPAG but were restated and endorsed by the Court of Appeal in R (Corner House Research) v The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 (see box on p 1396).

The judgment of Lord Justice Rimer in the instant case is a full one, tracing the twists and turns in the case law, from the fons et origo on one - man companies (Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961] AC 12, [1960] 3 All ER 420), through the policy - driven phase (that the secretary of state's guarantee was, in effect, meant only for «real» employees) as exemplified in Buchan v SSE [1997] IRLR 80, and then to SSTI v Bottrill [2000] 1 All ER 915, [1999] IRLR 326, where the Court of Appeal had not followed Buchan and had instead held that it was a question of fact, but in such a way as (the Court of Appeal now accepted) had led to uncertainty of application.

In an important judgment, the Court of Appeal has clarified the approach by the home secretary when certifying asylum and human rights claims as «clearly unfounded».

In a judgment released earlier today (Speciality Produce Limited v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2014] EWCA Civ 225), the Court of Appeal dealt with a case where the claimant, SPL, had sought judicial review of an initial decision by the Rural Payments Agency derecognising it as a producers organisation under the relevant EU Regulation.

In the judgments in KR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 514, [2007] All ER (D) 426 (May), which were handed down in May 2007, the Court of Appeal recast the approach to proportionality set out in Huang.

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment supporting the Secretary of State's decision not to disclose further information for reasons of national security.