Not exact matches
So I
assume you're trying to convince
secular people like myself.
The point modernist rationalism has to establish, or
assume, is that a common
secular rationality exists which is capable in principle of resolving the issues that actually divide
people.
The commonly
assumed distinctions between the «religious» and the «
secular» and between «religion» and «morality» are really very odd, says Smith, and make little sense to
people who believe that the world has a story, as in upper case Story.
The former alliance between faith and reason was dissolved as more and more
people began to
assume that faith is «religious» while reason is «
secular.»