Sentences with phrase «see no evil at»

Not exact matches

The fear of the great nothing is too much for my mind to bear, and I can sleep at night by convincing myself that the absolute nothing we all face one day will instead be full of happy choirs of angels, reward for any suffering I've endured, punishment of the wicked and evil (it pains me to think those who cause so much evil will not suffer for eternity, so hell is a great comfort too), and that I'll get to see all those I currently miss since the death of friends and family are so painful.

In early scenes she is seen at prayer meetings, where the pastor tells her that Jesus will shield her if she encounters evil.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Any so - called «God» who allows the level of suffering that we've seen on this earth is, at best, impotent and, at worst, evil or indifferent.

your so right, it is so sad to see people criticising God and at the end of the day God Exists and always will regardless of the evil that is said against Him.

When we look at humanity we see people committing evil, which we call sin.

And since all parties agree that there are intrinsically possible worlds containing no evil at all, every instance of evil in the actual world must be seen as a necessary, desired aspect of God's perfect plan.

Now that I look at my office bookshelf, I see that I've got «I Will Fear No Evil» and «The Number of the Beast» right in front of me.

You say: «To understand God, Scripture, ourselves, other people, human history, and everything else, we must begin at the cross, and we must see it as evil.

At the time I did not see that Kadir clearly saw that what happened to Jesus was truly evil and revolting.

In fact, they go beyond doubt and accuse God of abandoning them, being deaf, not caring about their desperate situation and allowing evil to triumph (to see what I mean look at Psalm 10, 13, 22, 89, 94... just to name a few of them).

The major Christian tradition has not been pacifism, in the sense of refusal to share in any war, but it has been a testimony for peace in the sense that war is seen as a necessary evil at best and never something in which to glory.

At the moment, I would much rather see the U.S. military intervene in Israel and Palestine to provide security for both peoples and the possibility of building a democratic and peaceful Palestinian state than engage in a highly personalized invasion of an «evil» country yet to be proven a threat to anyone.

Lem me see here, according to your holy book your God personally ordered more infant killings than all American abortion doctors combined, ordered the annihilation of half a dozen civilizations, routinely taunted and tortured humanity, introduced evil into the world then blamed the things he created for it (even though he's supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent), then abandoned humanity for at least a couple thousand years while making plans to come back and slaughter 2/3 of Earth's inhabitants so that he can judge them and throw most of them into a torturous hell for all of eternity... for not being able to overcome the nature your book says he gave them... Just so he can have non-free will - having cloud gnomes sing his praises for eternity.

I am old and tire of all the world and earth, I see only evil, from a little to a lot and I do not see any good in the world at all, never have.

The fact is that the VAST majority of translations do not see «rah» in Isa 45:7 to be best rendered as «evil», at least not in the ethical sense of the word.)

So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential side of the problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.

You want to see evil — look at a satelite photo of the Korean penisula at night.

Indeed, even those who would want to absolve Heidegger by seeing his official entry into the Nazi party or his Nazi Rektorat (rectorate) as a selfless attempt by him to prevent greater evils, are bound at least to accept the legitimacy of my inquiry.

Such intention in the classic just war tradition, as we have seen, includes the avoidance of wrong intentions, which easily translate from Augustine's list into familiar contemporary evils: aggressive war for the aggressor's sole benefit; wars for reasons based on religious, ethnic, or ideological difference; use of force aimed at terrorizing or oppressing those on whom it falls for the benefit of the wielder of power.

To me, that is the ultimate explanation of making evil «other», when in fact facing our own ability to be evil, and at the same time to see the humanity in others, are needed to understand evil.

The prophetic allows «the evil» to find the direction that leads toward God, and to enter into the good; the apocalyptic sees good and evil severed forever at the end of days, the good redeemed, the evil unredeemable for all eternity; the prophetic believes that the earth shall be hallowed, the apocalyptic despairs of an earth which it considers to be hopelessly doomed... (Moses, p. 188; Israel and the World, «The Power of the Spirit,» pp. 176 - 179.)

Arrived at this point, we can see how great an antagonism may naturally arise between the healthy - minded way of viewing life and the way that takes all this experience of evil as something essential.

With this clue we can see that, whatever we may make of particular «miracles», the miracle - stories as a whole are saying precisely this: that where Jesus was, there was some incalculable and unaccountable energy at work for the dispersal of evil forces and the total renewal of human life; and that this was nothing less than the creative energy of the living God.

I think at least one of the reasons you see this more in relgious discussions is because christianity has integrated into it the idea that the «world» is «evil» and so persecution is seen as a validation of their beliefs.

Now some look at this, and see the similar terminology here and when Jesus rebuked the evil spirit in Luke 4:35, and assume that Jesus must be rebuking an evil spirit of fever here, or something.

Basically, what has happened with CST is comparable to what has happened with marriage and family: We spend a lot of time talking about contraception and abortion and bioethical dilemmas, and unfortunately we must do so, given the gravity of these evils and the obsessions of our day — but as a result we can fail to see, or at least fail to communicate to others, the profound truth of the sacrament of matrimony, which is the foundation of all the rules and prohibitions.

If you ever see a church where the Word of God is not preached, and where chaos and confusion are the norm, you can be fairly certain that evil spiritual forces are at work behind the scenes.

And when we observe the church, the so called Savior center, we see, at least according to Scott Peck, a far greater concentration of evil.

To summarize, to literalize the apocalyptic passages in the New Testament, is to run counter to all we know of astronomy and the world of space; they are tied in with the then - current Jewish eschatology and Persian dualism which saw evil in command of creation; as commonly accepted, they encourage passivity about the evils of the present world; they emphasize only one side of the message of Jesus to the exclusion of essential elements; they are grounded at least in part on a misconstruction of biblical poetry and drama.

It is a long way from such an ideal of political activity to the actualities in which it is carried on; but it is essential to our human attempt to live together to see that the «game of politics» is not merely a necessary evil but that it has at its best a link with legitimate good.

We shall see shortly how the problem of evil is articulated exactly at this point of real efficacy.

Theists quite properly see the hand of God at work in major evolutionary changes such as the origin of life, but also in such everyday occurrences as the development of a fertilized egg into a cocker pup, and too in the social turmoil — including very real moral and physical evil — that accompanies economic, technological, and intellectual change.

Try reading Greg Boyds book God at War... it really helped me to see the problem with the problem of evil.

I have had this experience three times now, on three different occasions, in admittedly similar circumstances, but not similar enough to explain the coincidence: I am speaking from a podium to a fairly large audience on the topics of — to put it broadly — evil, suffering, and God; I have been talking for several minutes about Ivan Karamazov, and about things I have written on Dostoevsky, to what seems general approbation; then, for some reason or other, I happen to remark that, considered purely as an artist, Dostoevsky is immeasurably inferior to Tolstoy; at this, a single pained gasp of incredulity breaks out somewhat to the right of the podium, and I turn my head to see a woman with long brown hair, somewhere in her middle thirties, seated in the third or fourth row, shaking her head in wide - eyed astonishment at my loutish stupidity.

Look at all these evil atheists and evil muslims making all these awful comments about the Catholic faith, but you don't see the Catholic people going crazy, burning down building, and killing innocent people, do you??

We walked directly past some of the evil beings, which didn't seem to see us, and stopped at another pit of fire and brimstone.

His first postulate is that doing good is nothing more than avoiding evil, while his second is that in a Demiurge - ruled universe there is always available to an elite a trustworthy perspective in which anyone and everything at any time can be seen as nothing but evil.

See: the atheist can look at this, and even imagine it, but in his mind the only way to judge this is to say, «if that's so, God must be evil.

As he looked at him she seen an evil man.

But it is seen in relationship to the basic activity which is God himself who is able both to bring good out of evil and at the same time to rejoice in the good which is achieved in the creation.

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others - those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence fo the lord our God the reason we are here...

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others — those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence of the lord our God the reason we are here...

This goes to the heart of purpose of human creation, Allah says that humans will be tested through losing their wealth and loved ones and personal sufferings in the same way when they are tested by having wealth and children's so we can see who was the most patient and righteous at the end so let's not blame God for all evils a human being is able to commit.

Somehow Joseph could see God at work not only in the good things that happened in his life, but also in the evil done to him by others.

What was seen at that movie theater was evil.

Anyone, Christian or non-Christian, who looks at the world today clearly sees the indescribable evil that permeates it.

24 See Charles Hartshorne, «A New Look at the Problem of Evil,» Current Philosophical Issues: Essays in Honor of Curt John Ducasse (Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publications, 1966), p. 204.

«Ella and Louis», or any compilation that has them both really, for how to treat standards Count Basie, «The Complete Atomic Basie» to hear one of the best big bands at their best Duke Ellington, «At Newport» to go slightly deeper in big band Miles Davis, «Kind Of Blue» is super accessible greatness Wayne Shorter, «Speak No Evil» to go a lil deeper in that John Coltrane, «My Favorite Things» I love but some people are annoyed John Coltrane «Love Supreme» or many others to dig that mine more Herbie Hancock, «Chameleon» to start to see influence on other genat their best Duke Ellington, «At Newport» to go slightly deeper in big band Miles Davis, «Kind Of Blue» is super accessible greatness Wayne Shorter, «Speak No Evil» to go a lil deeper in that John Coltrane, «My Favorite Things» I love but some people are annoyed John Coltrane «Love Supreme» or many others to dig that mine more Herbie Hancock, «Chameleon» to start to see influence on other genAt Newport» to go slightly deeper in big band Miles Davis, «Kind Of Blue» is super accessible greatness Wayne Shorter, «Speak No Evil» to go a lil deeper in that John Coltrane, «My Favorite Things» I love but some people are annoyed John Coltrane «Love Supreme» or many others to dig that mine more Herbie Hancock, «Chameleon» to start to see influence on other genre

The bottom - line is the move from the Highbury was based on lies, it's clear to see that what was supposed to be a necessary evil to compete at the highest levels, was in fact an elaborate ruse concocted by the filthy rich as a means to increase their wealth at our expense.