Sentences with phrase «see eg»

non-compliance with statutory requirements for consultation and consent may affect the validity of future act agreements (see eg Reg 8 (7)-RRB-.

To enforce a foreign judgment, all a plaintiff must demonstrate is a real and substantial connection between the dispute and the foreign court, such that it could be said that the foreign court properly assumed jurisdiction, and that the defendant was served in accordance with the applicable rules (see eg para 27).

The courts have also held that allegations of dishonesty in civil proceedings do not require the criminal standard: see eg, Dadourian Group International inc v Sims [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep 601 an action for the tort of deceit; and Wanjiku v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 264, concerning automatic refusal of leave to enter or remain in the UK where «false representations» have been made.

LPP (or «legal privilege» as Parliament tends to call it: see eg the current Investigatory Powers Bill, cl 25), has two limbs: advice privilege (ie LAP) and litigation privilege.

regular readers will know that we have consistently reported on challenges to the 1267 regime before national and regional courts on this blog (see eg here, here, here, here, here, and here).

I think that there have been plenty other cases where the CJEU was unable to establish this and, in any case, it provided an answer on the premise that the referring court would first have to assess whether such cross-border interest existed (for recent examples, see eg the 2015 Judgments in UNIS, C - 25 / 14, EU: C: 2015:821; or Enterprise Focused Solutions, C - 278 / 14, EU: C: 2015:228).

For example, what happens where no proceedings are issued save for a consent order (see eg Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins [1985] AC 424, [1985] FLR 813)?

Delegated legislation, such as procedural rules, can not create new law (see eg Jaffray v The Society of Lloyds [2007] EWCA Civ 586, [2007] All ER (D) 213 (Jun)-RRB-.

In FPR 2010 the rules committee has restricted the common law open justice principle (see eg R (on the application of Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates» Court [2012] EWCA Civ 420, [2012] 3 All ER 551 per Lord Justice Toulson at [66]-RRB- in a way which is not expressly permitted by the 2003 Act.

Rules operate to regulate substantive remedies (see eg Dunhill v Burgin (Nos 1 and 2)[2014] UKSC 18, [2014] 1 WLR 933).

This is the more so where (as with injunctions in UL v BK) fundamental rights are engaged (see eg R v Special Commissioner and another ex parte Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd [2002] UKHL 21, [2002] 3 All ER 1).

Most people in UK — with the exception of the editor of the Daily Mail — probably believe that justice is what English judges do very well (see eg R (Miller & anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [2017] 2 WLR 583)-RRB-; so a «right to justice» is not something we need.

Proof of an allegation that there has been non-disclosure is upon the applicant (see eg, McFarlane LJ in N v N [at 72]-RRB-.

It does not apply at all in children proceedings (proceedings under FPR 2010 Parts 12 to 14 are excluded by r 4.4 (1)-RRB-; so that save in the more technical pleadings area of divorce its application will be rare (see eg Lindner v Rawlins [2015] EWCA Civ 61).

To set aside — on either basis — is «exceptional» (see eg, Lawrence Collins LJ in Dixon v Marchant [2008] EWCA Civ 11, [2008] 1 FLR 655: the need for finality must be balanced against the requirement of «justice» (Barder)-RRB-.

That said there will be instances where a spouse or partner seeks to pursue a case — for example one already dismissed by the courts (see eg Mann v Mann [2014] EWCA Civ 1674 where the Court of Appeal were critical of Mostyn J for seeking to vary a court order where the issues between the parties had been disposed of: only enforcement remained to be resolved).

This had been the law for many years (see eg, In re Barrell Enterprises [1973] 1 WLR 19, [1972] 3 All ER 631 and Paulin v Paulin [2009] EWCA Civ 221, [2010] 1 WLR 1057) said the Supreme Court; and the justices had no plans to change this.

CO2 has been an important factor in pretty much all large temperature changes in the earth's past, see eg this excellent presentation.

From solar min to solar max the influence on temp has been estimated at around 0.1 deg C (some scientists came to 0.2), and the LIA was at least partly influenced by a sustained period of low solar activity, combined with high volcanic activity (see eg the wikipedia link I provided in the blog post).

True enough, and known (see eg the green error bands on this figure: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.pdf)

True enough, and known (see eg the green error bands on this figure: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.pdf)» [I could not get there but believe you]

For an informal take on predictions done by Hansen, see eg http://rabett.blogspot.com/2009/06/catastrophist-elizabeth-kolbert-has.html:

Deconstructing these simplistic terms requires discussion at length (see eg this comment) which lull readers, and often the writer, to sleep.

See eg here and here for our own particular approach to this (but many others have worked on it, of course).

Greg Craven (the high school teacher with the youtube climate hit a few years ago) does the latter very well, see eg this video of his, where he sais:

There are ESG indices that rate business practices of thousands of companies worldwide, see eg.

The concepts of stomatal regulation (i.e. what Mike & Timothy were mentioning above) and how plant growth is influenced by climatic and abiotic factors is discussed in several places in the TAR, see eg.

Remarkably enough, the removal of such cells arrested tissue degeneration, holding the muscles and adipose tissue (and, when administered before cataract was mature, lens opacification) at approximately the same relatively youthful condition prevalent when the inducing drug was first administered (see eg.

And it's not about «with us or against us» (that's more the side of QAIA, see eg their support for BSD), but about one - sidedness; they are very quick to critizise real and imagined Israeli crimes, but apply very different standards to «the other side».

Although given how one side handles the truth, it is not clear that that would be more convincing than classical journalistic work (see eg the inaugural crowd controversy, or the denial of the «grab them» comment or various other documented (via video / audio / tweet) cases where Trump said something only to deny having said it later).

Not exact matches

Only now in 2012 are we seeing signs of companies raising their dividends eg Wal - Mart and American Express.

@kevanlee: disqus would be interested in seeing what the ideal length of a review was (eg Yelp, TripAdvisor, Amazon product, etc)

Mostly I have seeing that election is always linked with glorification and the eternal purpose themes in scripture eg Romans 8:16 - 30, Hebrews 2:10 and 2 Thessalonians 2:10 - 14.

Can you see now why faith is not a good thing... eg.

If we confess the scriptures that we want to see come to pass in our lives... eg.»

This is possibly not yet so profound in USA, but it is dramatic in the UK and Europe — and has always been so in Australia: even if now seen more (eg in the alienation from church life of those seeking Baptisms and Weddings).

But it would have been interesting to see what would have happened if, instead of rioting, the people went to the local police stations and lay down on the steps, the footpath, along the road, and refused to leave until they got a predetermined outcome (eg a review of the evidence, apologies etc, or a form of forgiveness and grace as Jeremy has suggested here).

Analogous to Whitehead's process principle, in the formation of the structures of cognition, Piaget saw more than simply the conditions which allow for cognition (EG 115f.).

eg we see wrath of God as a angry God, but in the greek it can mean something very different.

Both Aristotle and Thomas saw complexity as incrementation of form, arising from the innate propensities of matter at a lower level (eg De Generatione et Corruptione, II, 1 - 4; In Metaphysicorum, V, lee.

I know this explanation gets long, but what I see happening all too often is an organisation is started up by people to serve a need or answer a question, then the organisation develops its own needs (eg.

- see, eg, Richard Willingham and Saffron Howden, MPs concern over supermarket wars, (SMH, February 1, 2012)

See, eg, Ken McGregor, «Senator Nick Xenophon moves to smash Coles and Woolworths duopoly» (The Advertiser, 27 March 2012)

Yes, the opposition wants the ACCC to investigate Coles and Woolworths for their decision to vigorously compete on the price of milk (see, eg, AAP, «Oppn calls in watchdog over milk debate».

See also, eg, John Durie, «Rod Sims puts dairy players on notice over lack of competition» (The Australian, 30 November 2017) and Simone Smith and Peter Hemphill, «Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Dairy Inquiry interim report released» (The Weekly Times, 30 November 2017).

See, eg, «Liberals, Xenophon drive towards new Senate banking Inquiry» (Banking Day, 28/10/10) and «Withdraw guarantee for big banks: Hockey» (Business Spectator, 28/10/10)

See also media from earlier this year - eg, Adele Ferguson, «Beer battle «priority» as ACCC puts heat on Lion, Carlton & United over beer tap deals» (SMH, 16 February 2015)

See, eg, John Durie, «Japan Post to appeal ACCC rejection of Sea Swift merger deal» (The Australian, 10 July 2015) and Elliana Lawford, «Toll Group to appeal to ACCC's decision to oppose NT freight assets sale to rival Sea Swift» (ABC News, 9 July 2015).

Frank Zumbo hit the media waves supporting the inquiry, claiming that the inquiry should be «welcomed for the purpose of shedding light on this whole issue» and to «give Coles and Woolworths a chance to explain their behaviour» (see, eg, Patrick Stafford, «Milk inquiry to probe Coles, Woolworths over massive discounting» (Smart Company, 11 February 2011)-RRB-.

Sometimes I use to wonder how arsenal players got injured, you can see them play the whole 90minutes and the next morning you read they are injured how??? On the bed or in there dreams??? Eg Ozil went for international duty without even a full knowledge that he (himself) is injured wtf?