Seeing as atheists are constantly calling for proof, it doesn't make sense to say that atheists have faith.
So the only place
you see us as atheists, the only place you know we are atheists is when we discuss an article like this, and you only see those who post.
Not exact matches
I
see atheists doing exactly the same thing, saying «we just don't know»
as a justification for things that contradict physical laws and reason.
seeing we
atheists are committing such evil actions
as equality and freedom of choice for females, what are you doing to stop us?
I
see no greater lack of morals in the religious sect
as atheists.
Just understand that not all of us
atheists intend to come off
as condescending and mean; - We just don't
see why you rely on beliefs that are probably just another set of man - made beliefs.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've
seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution,
Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not
as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
I don't
see a problem with an
atheist as president, we have an
atheist prime minister and the government still functions superficially a mormon in the top job should be no real problem except would you really like to have a president who wears secret underwear?
Therefore I will not be surprised if those religious minorities would rally with him disguised
as Atheists... It is obvious
as well that him being of Jewish family that the Jewish organizations are behind the
seen supporting / financing him..
As an atheist, I sort of see this as «in your face» as those stupid «YOU»RE GOING TO HELL» billboard
As an
atheist, I sort of
see this
as «in your face» as those stupid «YOU»RE GOING TO HELL» billboard
as «in your face»
as those stupid «YOU»RE GOING TO HELL» billboard
as those stupid «YOU»RE GOING TO HELL» billboards.
I guess i'm just a bit stunned,
seeing as how so many
atheist posts were claiming intellectual superiority until this article.
Especially
seeing as how 76 % of Texas voters opted to ban both gay marriage and civi unions, I don't think they really are very sympathetic to the message these
atheists are trying to put out.
I
see a lot of
Atheists responding to the last 2k years worth of mankind's legacy of irrational fear in trying to explain who God is, using those silly fears interpreted in the Bible (although yes I agree, they stated them
as fact)
as justification to deny the existence of God, & not the concept itself.
As a God - fearing soul - filled person, I
see no reason to bargain with
atheists or their idiotic vestiges of palpable dogma they spew forth by their desicrating religious faiths of abundant measures Teach your children well you parents of Atheistic dissention.
One person said he would
see but might well choose to stay with his existing beliefs, but could not be defined
as either religious or
atheist.
The fact that you want the best for me — that you want me to find and know the truth — helps me to
see that just
as all Christians can not be lumped into one narrow category, neither can
atheists.
Most of the righteous people I
see are agnostics and
atheists; most of the unrighteous people I
see are those who claim their god is going to punish and burn people who don't have the same non-provable OPINIONS
as they do.
This is almost
as good
as the one about the
atheist on his deathbed who was allegedly heard to utter «When I didn't
see you where?»
And if at that point I could think or reason which, of course,
atheists probably believe I would not be able to do because I would be nothing but decaying matter... I believe that I would be disappointed to not
see God
as I expected to.
It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism
as a religion, the passion most
Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I
see that
as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?
Recognizing this fact, the National
Atheist Party has no quarrel with those that would like to
see the «cross»
as a part of such a memorial, with the caveat that other faiths, including none at all, should also be represented.
So... for an
atheist or a believer... whatever language they use to articulate their thoughts... I think this somehow should be respected but also be
seen as insufficient, partial, and provisional.
As you can
see from the entire context (which
atheists hate to provide..
This is why Christians
see atheists as being lost and try to bring them back to reality.
You
see you reject all but one of the gods so you are almost
as much an
atheist as I am... I have just gone one more god than you.
I realize that this will be frustrating to some
atheists who
see it
as another subjective theistic cop - out and to some theists
as a cowardly compromise.
We then get radical
Atheist that also read the text and
see it the exact same
as Rev Terry Jones and
as foolish
as him believe that all Christians must and have to believe the same
as him.
As a Christian, I find that I make the same mistakes atheists make; I resent people typecasting me just as others do, I get my feelings hurt when people bash me for no reason, I get angry when I see selfish, mean people attacking others needlessly, and I hate war, death, and cruelty where ever it is foun
As a Christian, I find that I make the same mistakes
atheists make; I resent people typecasting me just
as others do, I get my feelings hurt when people bash me for no reason, I get angry when I see selfish, mean people attacking others needlessly, and I hate war, death, and cruelty where ever it is foun
as others do, I get my feelings hurt when people bash me for no reason, I get angry when I
see selfish, mean people attacking others needlessly, and I hate war, death, and cruelty where ever it is found.
These people that proclaim that they have
seen an image of Mary of God are
as lost and crazy
as all of these Anti-Christ (
Atheists / Agnostics) are.
As I'm writing this, I can
see all the religious people saying all
atheists should be fired because they bring the devil into the place of work... so I feel the need to provide the caveat: conflict with their objectives in a way that is sanely and reasonably shown.
As an atheist I often find myself at odds with fellow atheists who do not see the difference between Christians and Muslims as I d
As an
atheist I often find myself at odds with fellow
atheists who do not
see the difference between Christians and Muslims
as I d
as I do.
You could
see from the footnotes and the questions I asked that I've read all the liberal literature, I've read the
atheist literature — and I stood in the shoes of the skeptic
as I asked the tough questions — I just didn't find them convincing.
I
see this movie more
as a vehicle to show that this is true, and that the stereotype that all
atheists have no morals is false.
People that they
see as «sinners», like gays,
atheists, women who abort pregnancies, and so on.
As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alon
As an
atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but
see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema
as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alon
as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.
as an
atheist and democrat, I always
saw Obama
as basically a non-believer, who uses religion or pays respect to religion when it is politically appropriate or expedient.
As an atheist, I see this as a non-stor
As an
atheist, I
see this
as a non-stor
as a non-story.
As a vocal Christian, Shirley's determination to steer the group's moral code often comes across as judgmental (when Britta, the group's vocal atheist, forgets to bring a present to the Christmas party, Shirley quips, «I see you brought what you believe in: nothing.»
As a vocal Christian, Shirley's determination to steer the group's moral code often comes across
as judgmental (when Britta, the group's vocal atheist, forgets to bring a present to the Christmas party, Shirley quips, «I see you brought what you believe in: nothing.»
as judgmental (when Britta, the group's vocal
atheist, forgets to bring a present to the Christmas party, Shirley quips, «I
see you brought what you believe in: nothing.»)
I finally gave in to the term
Atheist, but I still
see jersey - wearing
as inherently problematic.
So for some Christians, there is a vested interest in making all
Atheists into Agnostics so
as to say, «
See, there could be a God — you should stay more open minded.»
Him posting
as an
atheist then suggests that how he
sees things is not dictated by a religion, and his beliefs have been determined from life observations, educational background.
You know — every time I
see religion debated on a public forum, the whole thing is an exercise in mental futility
as both the
atheists and even some of the Christians make the same type of mistakes over and over again and just yell back and forth at each other.
They admit it to me, since they know I am an
atheist, but believers instantly
see it
as an attack on them.
Ritter is an
atheist himself he might
see something of value coming from a non-believer such
as you.
I liked that he
saw most
atheists as seekers of truth.
Do you
see Atheists threatening people with imaginary places such
as hell for not believing the same?
I don't
see how he can do his job while openly stating he is «living»
as an
atheist and he says he wont acknowledge god or pray.
Yes, coming out
as a «probationary
atheist» might provoke a religious organization to give you the boot, but the only difference I
see between Bell and the many
atheists already in our churches was his admission / confession to being one.
To say nothing of the eerie coincidences in a Muslim from Saudi Arabia
seeing the same things
as a Colombian youth,
seeing the same things
as an American
atheist on his deathbed.
This shows up in the relatively low total number of people self - identifying
as SBNR and
atheist / agnostic in the polls compared with what I
see in the people I meet.