Sentences with phrase «sensitivity analysis excluding»

If there is insufficient information to control for clustering, we will enter outcome data into RevMan using individuals as the units of analysis, and then conduct a sensitivity analysis excluding such studies (Sensitivity analysis), to assess the potential biasing effects of inadequately controlled clustered trials (Donner 2001).
Cox Proportional Hazard Ratios (HR) for Sensitivity Analysis Excluding Participants With Physician - Diagnosed CVD or Cancer at Baseline
Sensitivity analyses excluding extreme values of sugar intake and excluding person - observations with self - reported doctor diagnosis at baseline attenuated the association of sugar intake from sweet food / beverages and recurrent depression slightly (before P for tertile trend 0.003 after 0.022 and 0.010, respectively).

Not exact matches

The sensitivity analysis showed our findings to be robust when we increased the denominator of the low risk group by 10 % (web appendix A) and when we excluded multiple gestations (web appendix B).
For one study that was conducted in China (Wu 2014), data were not presented in the paper or available in the WHO Global Data Bank on Infant and Young Child Feeding and so were therefore excluded from the sensitivity analysis.
There were 830 participants whose fingers had features that might have affected the validity of the measurements, and so they were excluded in the additional sensitivity analysis.
Climate model studies and empirical analyses of paleoclimate data can provide estimates of the amplification of climate sensitivity caused by slow feedbacks, excluding the singular mechanisms that caused the hyperthermal events.
Furthermore, the main findings of our study were still significant in sensitivity analyses under the most conservative assumption that diet was unrelated to inflammatory disease mortality in those excluded from analyses.
In sensitivity analyses, main analyses were repeated by: (a) excluding participants with unknown or reported doctor diagnosis of depression at each baseline (at phases 3 / 5/7 / 9: 166 / 156/193 / 209 individuals) and: (b) excluding participants with extreme values of sugar intake (> 7 SD) at phases 3 / 5/7 / 9: 5 / 3/4 / 4 individuals.
Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding individuals who might have made dietary adjustments and / or lifestyle changes because of chronic disease at baseline (i.e., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, and / or stroke) and by excluding misreports of energy according to Goldberg criterion categories, defined as «under - reporters» with a ratio of energy intake to basal metabolic rate < 1.14 and «over-reporters» with a ratio of > 2.1 (29).
In a third series of sensitivity tests, I excluded from the analysis one country at a time to make sure that the situation in no one country was driving the overall pattern of results.
In a fourth set of sensitivity tests, I separately excluded the countries from these two regions from the analysis to see whether results were highly dependent on one or the other cluster.
You then proceed to conduct a simple and important piece of sensitivity analysis, basically asking what is the maximum sensitivity that we could exclude as a possibility at the 95 % significance level.
Those scenarios are excluded from this analysis, because we are trying to understand if a low - sensitivity world means CO2 emissions can be high.
Climate model studies and empirical analyses of paleoclimate data can provide estimates of the amplification of climate sensitivity caused by slow feedbacks, excluding the singular mechanisms that caused the hyperthermal events.
If a sensitivity analysis is done in which the Graybill bristlecone chronologies are excluded from the AD1400 network, then a materially different reconstruction results — a point made originally in the MM articles [note: also Cook's old Gaspe chronology which has its own serious issues — see below], confirmed by Wahl and Ammann 2007 and noted by the NAS panel.
The adolescents initially excluded from the study cohort (n = 1012) because they had no participating parents were included in a sensitivity analysis of the relationship between SCL - 5 score and benefit receipt (n = 8509).
Sensitivity analysis will be conducted excluding trials judged to be at high risk of bias.
Sensitivity analyses showed that all of the significant results for both physical and mental / developmental outcomes were lost once studies that were conducted in the East or that were categorised as being at high risk of bias, had been excluded, and at follow - up.
As we identified seven outlying effect sizes (see above), we performed a sensitivity analysis in which we estimated an overall effect of child maltreatment interventions using the data in which the outlying effect sizes were excluded.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z