Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial,
serious errors
in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play
in their playground «
reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC
reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who
raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information
in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, knowledgeably and
in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the social and political
issues — is just not credible.
Croakey has previously
reported that the long - awaited, damning and ultimately disappointing findings into the 2014 death
in custody of Yamatji woman Ms Dhu
raise serious issues not just for governments and police, but also for health and medical systems and practice
in Australia.