Shareholder Claims comes at an interesting time for investors, companies and their respective advisers.
Not exact matches
Because the
shareholders hold the residual
claim, and all corporate expenditures thus
come out of their pocket, it is not entirely clear why other
shareholders should have to subsidize speech by a small minority.
(Posted 24 December 2011) Significant current scandals, and those yet to
come In no particular order Top salaries and bonuses - boardroom and
shareholder individual responsibility The multiple between top and average pay Lawyers fees - the cost of the legal process Medical negligence
claims against the NHS Care and treatment in the NHS «No win, no fee» personal injury compensation Democracy and the voting system Lords reform Political party funding The domestic energy market and pricing The Tax system and its inefficiencies and complexities Subsidies for new energy generation schemes The amount of crime fuelled by Drugs The availability of drugs in prison.
«The lender would receive not a direct
claim on that homeowner, but a participation in the Treasury's «PAR fund» which would pay out proportionately from all PAR proceeds received by the Treasury (technically, new shares in the PAR fund would be assigned based on a ratio reflecting the extent to which existing
shareholders have already been paid off, so earlier
shareholders don't receive more than they have
coming to them).
Andrew Head, partner at Forsters LLP, says the
shareholders most likely to sue the government are the two largest hedge funds SRM Global and RAB Capital, although possible action could also
come from smaller
shareholders who may form an action group to pursue their
claim.