Sentences with phrase «shareholders of the company seem»

Not exact matches

Close to 40 % became shareholders, a development that seemed to inspire workers to look beyond their own wages and working conditions and consider the health of the company as a whole.

Of course, given that a similar proxy access proposal received 49.9 % of the vote last year, compared to this year's 57 %, company responsiveness to shareholder desires doesn't seem to be deeply ingraineOf course, given that a similar proxy access proposal received 49.9 % of the vote last year, compared to this year's 57 %, company responsiveness to shareholder desires doesn't seem to be deeply ingraineof the vote last year, compared to this year's 57 %, company responsiveness to shareholder desires doesn't seem to be deeply ingrained.

In fact the pill seems to have been put in place to thwart Carl Icahn, who really is exactly the sort of guy who would run a coercive two - step tender offer to put pressure on shareholders so he can take control of a company.

Most big finance firms are public companies these days and have shareholders to answer to, but seem to share much greater portion of its profits with their employees.

Its often seemed odd to me how Buffett lef these partners of his come along for a free ride... by running a company not fund... guess that's capitalism, that's shareholders... they were entitled to the slice they left with him from his partnership / hedgie days if my memory serves, but you have to say — what a deal!

It seems like the numbers go up every year: WPP's share price, Sir Martin Sorrell's pay total, and the level of shareholder opposition to the company's remuneration report.

The company seems to be making some of the right moves to continue building returns for their shareholders.

But depriving three big brokerage firms of allocations seems to be a little at odds with what the Treasury Department, the company's biggest shareholder, had hoped to achieve.

Corporate lawyers have complex loyalties, but many seem more concerned to satisfy the company managers who hire and fire lawyers than to protect the interests of scattered shareholder - owners.

Altough this seems not so critical, cause the all insane shareholders of Tesla (I m not one of these) don t seem to give a damm about if Tesla is making money or not (any other car company values would crash), but over the years Tesla needs to make profit, and I doubt that this is possible.

Companies / brands seem to like acquiring «likes» and «followers» (enough to spend significant amounts on doing so), so you'd think they'd value and brag about the number of shareholders too.

I might google them to see if there is any dirt, particularly asx companies with large family ownership that don't always seems to act in the best interests of shareholders, unlike say in Europe.

With Dolphin Limited Partnership's nominee being invited to join the board, it seems that the chances of the company henceforth taking shareholder - friendly steps are good.

It seems these companies are able to return cash to shareholders (via dividend raises) on average in the 8 - 12 % range without share buybacks and in 11 - 15 % range with (total shareholder yield) outside of any additional increase in the actual price per share.

And results this week seem to suggest the company's liquid / realizable assets will soon be re-deployed into other Russian natural resource investments, so any prospect of shareholders receiving cold hard cash here appears increasingly remote.

The problem is that the merger requires a 2/3 majority vote of the public company shareholders and management can't seem to get the needed shareholder votes for whatever reason.

Well, if KWG was an AIM - listed company, I'd probably be off running & screaming in the opposite direction — that kind of stake on AIM seems to inevitably lead to coercive takeovers (at piss - poor prices), de-listings & other forms of minority shareholder abuse.

When you look at the company today, it seems obvious chiseling shareholders is ultimately worth far less than the accretive impact of continued buybacks & the potential average / peak valuations which can be attained if / when TFG transforms itself into a top tier / global alternative asset manager.

And the desire of companies to deny / exclude small shareholders (for reasons of convenience & economy) seems counter-productive to me anyway — they're often the most loyal of shareholders, and should be accommodated / rewarded accordingly.

Given Apple's history — and Steve Jobs» Hollywood contacts, courtesy of his position as The Walt Disney Company's largest shareholder — the company seemed perfectly poised to straddle the high - tech and entertainment Company's largest shareholder — the company seemed perfectly poised to straddle the high - tech and entertainment company seemed perfectly poised to straddle the high - tech and entertainment worlds.