The Shark Conservation Act passed by a House voice vote in March, and companion legislation is currently before the Senate Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries and Coast Guard Subcommittee.
Not exact matches
Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. («Oceana») on behalf of its adversely affected members hereby challenges the unlawful decision of the National Marine Fisheries Service («Fisheries Service» or «Defendants») to adopt and promulgate Amendment 5b to the Highly Migratory Species («HMS») Fishery Management Plan because it failed to establish measures necessary to end overfishing and rebuild the dusky
shark population to a healthy level as mandated by the Magnuson - Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management
Act («Magnuson - Stevens
Act»).
Signed into law (P.L. 106 - 557) on December 21, the
Act amends the Magnuson - Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management
Act to make it unlawful to: (1) remove any of the fins of a
shark, including the tail, and discard the carcass of the
shark at sea; (2) have control or possession of such a fin aboard a fishing vessel without the corresponding carcass; or (3) land such a fin without the corresponding carcass.
The Pew Environment Group calls on all countries, territories, and entities to improve
shark conservation and management by
acting now to end unmanaged and unsustainable
shark fishing and to regulate trade in threatened
sharks.