Sentences with phrase «shaver et»

The distinction between meditators and non-meditators has been shown to influence item - response tendencies on mindfulness questionnaires (Baer et al., 2008; Van Dam, Earleywine, & Danoff - Burg, 2009) and may account for the relatively larger portion of variance explained in the Shaver et al. (2007) study (R2 = 42 %), versus 18 % in the study by Walsh et al. (2009), which included trait anxiety as a co-predictor, and 14 % in the present study.
Different still are the findings reported by Shaver et al. (2007), showing that both attachment dimensions independently and robustly predicted mindfulness.
Given that the consequences of raising security activation on emotion regulation (e.g., Shaver et al., 2009) are mediated mostly through cognitive processes, we can expect that priming the secure base schema should have beneficial effects on emotion processing for individuals with attachment anxiety.
The cases are U.S. v. Shavers, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14 - mag - 02465; and SEC v. Shavers et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, No. 13 - 00416.
The cases are U.S. v. Shavers, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14 - mag - 02465, and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, No. 14 - mj - 00355; and SEC v. Shavers et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, No. 13 - 00416.

Not exact matches

AAS describes individual differences in representational models of close relationships which originate from early interactions with caregivers, remain relatively stable across the lifespan (Waters et al., 2000), and apply to adult romantic relationships (Hazan and Shaver, 1987).
Yet just as attachment styles are associated with different behavior patterns and outcomes in other realms (e.g., Crispi et al. 1997; Hazan and Shaver 1990), they also may be associated with differences in parent care.
Who we choose for a spouse, why we choose this person, and how we relate to this person, that's the attachment system operating within us (Feeney & Noller, 1990; Hazan & Shaver, 1987; Roisman, et al., 2001; Simpson, 1990) When we argue and fight with our spouse, trying to improve our relationship and restore our affectional bonding, that's the attachment system motivating us.
In the last couple of decades, research in the field of attachment has furthered the conceptualization of internal working models by proposing attachment anxiety as an important dimension underlying individual differences in attachment orientation (Brennan et al., 1998; Mikulincer and Shaver, 2003).
45 J.C. Rothbard & Phillip R. Shaver (1994), Continuity of Attachment Across the Life Span, in Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives (M.B. Sperling & W.H. Berman eds., 1994); Deborah B. Jacobvitz et al., The Transmission of Mother - Child Boundary Disturbances Across Three Generations, 3 Dev.
Decreased feelings of intimacy may signify less commitment to repairing, maintaining, or improving the marital relationship, creating an emotionally challenging environment in which to resolve conflict (Campbell et al., 2005; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2005).
The majority of relationship dissolution research examines topics such as attachment styles (e.g., Davis, Shaver, & Vernon, 2003), emotional reactions and coping strategies (e.g., Sbarra & Emery, 2005), predictors of breakup such as communicative styles (e.g., Gottman et al., 2003), and attractiveness of alternative relationships (e.g., Simpson, 1987).
This excessive reassurance - seeking from the romantic partner (Shaver, Schachner, & Mikulincer, 2005) might be explained by anxious attached individuals» lack of self - confidence in their own value as a romantic partner and in their ability to manage a partnership effectively (Ho et al., 2012).
Laboratory - based priming paradigms have been linked to brief changes in security - related constructs, such as increased empathy (Mikulincer, Gillath, et al., 2001), altruism (Gillath, Shaver, & Mikulincer, 2005; Mikulincer et al., 2005), self - worth (Baccus, Baldwin, & Packer, 2004), and openness to new experiences (Mikulincer, Hirschberger, Nachmias, & Gillath, 2001), and decreased fear of relationship threat (Gillath & Shaver, 2007).
Control variables — For our primary regression analyses we included several control variables that have established associations with crying and / or social support, particularly among adolescents and young adults: gender (Antonucci, 2001; De Fruyt, 1997; Peter et al., 2001; Shumaker & Hill, 1991), romantic relationship status (Connolly & Johnson, 1996), stress (Choti, Marston, Holston, & Hart, 1987; Cohen & Wills, 1985), loneliness (Jones & Moore, 1987; Rubenstein & Shaver, 1982), and depressive symptoms (Vingerhoets, Rottenberg, Cevaal, & Nelson, 2007).
Given that attachment has been strongly associated with psychopathology (Mikulincer and Shaver 2012), in particular depression and anxiety (Bosmans et al. 2010; Catanzaro and Wei 2010), examining the factors that mediate this relationship is of high theoretical and clinical value.
In fact, Bowlby always underlined the primary role of beliefs and cognitive schemata in orienting attachment behaviors and expectations, but it is only after the reconceptualization of attachment theory in representational terms that social cognitive models and methods have effectively been implemented in this field (Bartholomew and Horowitz, 1991; Brennan et al., 1998; Brennan and Shaver, 2002; Mikulincer et al., 2005; Shaver and Mikulincer, 2013).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z