Not exactly, though «America» from the 1957 musical West
Side Story does deal with many of the relevant issues — debt, Puerto Rico's relative impoverishment vis - a-vis the United States, the possibility of mass emigration, and the island's oft - misunderstood political relationship with the mainland United States.
This is not to say Side Stories doesn't play well, as it is actually pretty good on that front (though more of that later), but the sheer amount of content has caused unfortunate issues with the overall production quality.
Not exact matches
There is the danger of blaming some of these trends on the overt
side effects of technology, which is what the media
did in 2011 with
stories that implicated Facebook in playing a role in one - fifth of all divorces.
He said in the interview that he is so determined to get his
side of the
story out that he is writing a book about what happened at the investment bank although he
does not yet have a publishing contract.
The fan, Brad Joseph, gave his
side of the
story in a recent Facebook post, where he said he
did not regret calling Christie a hypocrite.
First, there is no incentive for Facebook to
do any of this; while the company denies this report in Gizmodo that the company shelved a change to the News Feed algorithm that would have eliminated fake news
stories because it disproportionately affected right - wing sites, the fact remains that the company is heavily incentivized to be perceived as neutral by all
sides; anything else would drive away users, a particularly problematic outcome for a social network.2
The
stories didn't come down on one
side or the other.
A New York Times article tells the
story of the women who run the organizational
side of LaserMonks, along the way describing the hobbies that many of the monks have but neglecting to mention that the monks
do their heavy share of manual labor in the business and on their property.
When abductee
stories involve missing time, va.gue hazy memories, and supposed behavioral
side effects I don't know if I would put much weight in that «evidence», even if it happened to me.
Yes listen to them, but if you want to hear the other
side of the
story don't go to the Toyota, or KIA guy, go to the source, the Ford dealer.
While I can't help but be touched by such a
story, my rational
side is insulted when I am asked to believe that this is the best the creator of the universe can
do, TODAY.
I'm starting to wonder if, because sexuality has become so politicized and such an unfortunate theological line - in - the - sand, we tend to brush aside
stories that don't fit our preferred paradigm for fear they will provide «ammunition» to the other
side.
But the
story I've lived and the
stories I know don't fit into «
Side A» or «
Side B,» and it is somewhat frustrating to feel as if our
stories not real, recognized, or legitimate.
So when I told you to stick your platitudes where the sun don't shine, what I was saying was that I reject your shamy concern trolling and refuse to allow you to control this narrative... like you tried to control MY statement by calling it «silencing» (the very word we've all been using to accuse TJ's EV crowd... very clever), and you tried to control JULIE»S
story by diminishing it to «well there are two
sides», and how you tried to control this entire conversation by saying what we think about it isn't important or relevant unless we're having face - to - face convos (and yet you're commenting here?
I'm honestly asking — when I
do not know these people or their
story, but I
do know the murkiness and agony of divorce — is it wrong of me to not want to rush to grab a pitchfork after hearing just one
side in a series of anecdotes derived from a divorce?
How
do we know that «fuck off back to sodom» won't be said to Julie by somebody else who doesn't like her
side of the
story.
That single
story has already been so exaggerated and exploited by folks on both
sides I'd rather not take the space in the post to address it, but may
do so in a comment or separate post.)
I don't know many people who are interested in hearing Scientology's
side of the
story because they're full of it, why would I want to hear any lies from the racist cult of mormonism?
This church never bothered to call me to hear my
side of the
story on why I stopped going and
doing things for them.
You can see the same thing happen with any
story mentioning a politician (immediate response of «you're
side is all wrong» and «you
do it too.»)
As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it
does not simply conduct a one -
sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling
stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.
Naah
do nt mention that, just keep feeding everyone your one
sides hate
stories.
«I definitely had sympathy for all the Christians who [didn't]
side with Carlton in the
story.»
(And as a
side note, I find it somewhat ironic that a
story about people not understanding the world's religions brings about many comments from people who
do not understand Christianity.)
I just don't see anyone explaining the other
side of the
story.
But long
story short, I got married and so
did our church — to the wrong
side of town.
What we
do argue is that the human search for knowledge of the ultimate metaphysical truths, that is, for the reality on which all things depend for their being, and the Christian attempt to clarify what we have found disclosed to us in Christ, are two complementary
sides of the same
story, the
story of God's self - disclosure to the mind of man.
The internet will not give you the figures on how many people have died in anguish fully believing God was on their
side and that they were fighting in his name or at least in his honor, defending their national religion as much as they
did their lands from other soldiers who had been told essentially the same
story on the other
side.
Humans crave order and power over their environment and their fellow creatures and what better way than to threaten them with unprovable
stories and then kill them when the don't acquiesce — because YOU are right an god is on YOUR
side.
As a
side note, I didn't explain the three
story types very well, but based on my understanding, I don't put the death on the cross under redemptive violence, unless it is God using violence against Jesus, which isn't quite what happened on the cross...
But it
does throw some light upon the dark
side of the human
story if we see human cruelties and destructiveness as corruptions of the power to love, and thus as belonging not to the norm of human nature but to its pathology.
So as I walked through the Creation Museum, I saw exhibit after exhibit that tried really hard to tell one
side of the
story, and to be honest they
did a pretty fair job.
• Jesus After 2000 Years: What He Really Said and
Did (Prometheus Books 2001) • The Great Deception: And What Jesus Really Said and
Did (Prometheus Books 1999) • Vi - rgin Birth: The Real
Story of Mary and Her Son Jesus (Trinity Pr Intl 1998) • What Really Happened to Jesus: A Historical Approach to the Resurrection (Westminster John Knox Pr 1996) • Heretics: The Other
Side of Early Christianity (Westminster John Knox Pr 1996) • Resurrection of Jesus: History, Experience, Theology (Fortress Pr 1995) • Gerd Lüdemann on the Secular Web (online) • Gerd Lüdemann's Homepage (online)
They
do anything but present two
sides of any
story.
I don't care what either of their pasts may show, all that matters is what happened in the time leading up to an armed man pulling a weapon on an unarmed teenager... a point that there really is only one
side of the
story being told for, dead men don't speak.
Another
side of this
story is that I have so much more I want to share besides food, and I don't know how, or even if this is the place for it.
«A lot of consumers still don't know exactly what «the
story of Starmont» is, so our goal is to further develop and market the brand through the wholesale system and continue working on the marketing
side to drive awareness,» Schlatter says.
I like to
do this to «America» from West
Side Story: Shake to this rhythm.
i'm sometimes the biggest jerk but then my beloved will
do something, say something that will reel me in and i'm back to his
side and i beg him for a
story about his childhood (i love
stories about how white people grow up and his
stories are the best) and the lovely cadence of his voice always soothes me.
Chris Webber didn't appear on ESPN's Fab Five 30 - for - 30 documentary, and has never publicly told his
side of the
story.
But that doesn't tell the whole
story, as Cesare Prandelli's
side outplayed the World Champions for long periods and were unlucky not to win.
There were several people saying that Ronda was being discussed as the next opponent for Cyborg, including Cyborg herself and Meisha Tate... but you know, don't let the facts started by the people who were there interfere with your pro-Ronda narrative (despite your assertions that you're not a fan, you sure as hell are all - in on any
side of the
story that favors her, even when there is clearly a debatable aspect to it).
Sometimes, there really is just one
side to a
story, and if you don't like it, tough shit.
To be fair Obviously there are two
sides to a
story and I don't know if he has had anger problems before but we don't need that sort of thing.
I am a little disconcerted that Wenger didn't request a personal hearing so he could give his
side of the
story, as he actually had an extremely valid defence that Dean made it look like he had a vendetta against the Arsenal boss.
Anyway don't crucify his former wife, I guess she has her
side of the
story and then there is the truth!
again this is Askren's
side of the
story so we don't know what Dana's
side is (or Bjorn's)(the later too being of unscrupulous character) tho I don't think ive seen Dana or Bjorn refute this
side of the
story
If you go out and
do your own research as a front office and come to the conclusion that you think Foster's
side of the
story is correct then you have to weather the storm when the charges are brought up.
A lot of Arsenal fans
did not expect us to get anything from today's away game against the Premier League leaders Man City, and that is how it turned out with De Bruyne, Aguero and Gabriel Jesus scoring to make it a comfortable 3 - 1 scoreline in the end, but that
did not tell the whole
story by any means and Arsene Wenger will surely point to a couple of key decisions that went the home
side's way at crucial points of the game.
Stats don't tell the full
story, and it's reasonable to argue that Debuchy was playing in a worse
side, thus suggesting why his stats are better than Sagna.