Sentences with phrase «significant differences in power»

Not exact matches

The differences between the logic of unilateral and relational powers become strikingly significant in the context of the inequalities of power among persons and communities which are so obvious in our experience.15 Unilateral power, by definition, increases in one person only as it decreases in another.

Results showed no significant differences in the ratings between the groups supplemented with rice versus whey for recovery and both groups experienced changes in body composition, strength and power, specifically, muscle mass, strength, and power increased while body fat decreased.

There were no statistically significant differences in stillbirth and early neonatal deaths between the three groups, although we had insufficient statistical power to test reliably for these differences.

Power analysis, based on detecting a significant difference in the combined frequency of non-optimal factors during and after childbirth, led us to aim for a sample size of 1600 women, with approximately half being multiparous and preferably half choosing hospital birth.

In most cases, there was insufficient power to find appreciable differences; only significant findings in infants are reported in the ResultIn most cases, there was insufficient power to find appreciable differences; only significant findings in infants are reported in the Resultin infants are reported in the Resultin the Results.

The UK government's decision to press ahead with new nuclear power stations in England highlights one of the areas where significant policy differences exist between the UK and the Scottish authorities.

Efforts to reduce GHGs enough to keep them flat are hardly enough to make much of a difference in the climate, he said, adding that developing nations must make significant investments in wind, solar, and nuclear power or emissions are going to rise in the long term.

It has recently been suggested that motion - related artifacts can have a significant impact on functional connectivity estimates (Power et al., 2012; Van Dijk et al., 2012) in such a way that makes it difficult to study developmental differences.

However, the differences in the 24 - hour non-protein RQ (0.80 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.02; p = 0.23) and hence in fat oxidation were not statistically significant likely due to low statistical power.

Additionally, whereas the BioCycle Study had greater racial diversity than comparable studies (3 — 6), our study was limited by different sample sizes among the racial groups, which may have limited our power to detect significant differences in some of our subgroup analyses.

Indeed, if anything, the results indicate that the most affluent districts fare better than the poorest districts, in terms of total funding, when Democrats are in power, although this difference is not statistically significant.

The researchers also point out there were 1290 unique school and grade combinations in the study sample — an average of 40 students per combination — which meant it «lacked statistical power to find significant differences between treatment conditions or grade levels».

As a result, these studies demonstrate the instructional power of integrating reading and writing within cumulative, in - depth science instruction represents a significant difference from the learning contexts represented by traditional basal reading selections (see Walsh, 2003).

Modest V - 8 Power In everyday driving, the performance difference between the Durango's standard 3.6 - liter V - 6 and available 5.7 - liter V - 8 isn't that significant.

So where there are significant differences in friction coefficients between the right and left rear wheel, for example, optimum traction and maximum propulsion power are ensured.

Significant differences between the two generations are the extra 50 mm in the Mk2 Sport's wheelbase, helping refine the chassis, the addition of a sixth gear ratio for less frenetic cruising, and an uprated 1.6 - litre four - pot that swells power from 123bhp to 134bhp.

Like her, they usually exercised power long enough to make a significant difference in the course of events.

Indeed, the major difference between the two scores is that the VantageScore drops its minimum scoring requirements regarding the length and recency of the consumer's credit history, which appears to result in a significant reduction in the score's predictive power.»

A significant difference in raw power does not necessarily translate to a significant difference in graphics, like it or not.

While there are significant differences in projected natural gas prices across baselines, with persistently lower prices in the High Oil and Gas Resource case, the Clean Power plan itself does not significantly move natural gas prices with the exception of an initial impact expected during the first 2 - 3 years after the start of implementation.

[1] Yearly differences in solar power can also be significant.

11 — A subtle (but significant) difference between wind energy and other conventional sources of electricity is in power quality.

In the most recent case case, the EPA is mandating that a New Mexican power facility install a $ 370 million retrofit that will not make any significant difference in the air quality - basically, a waste of moneIn the most recent case case, the EPA is mandating that a New Mexican power facility install a $ 370 million retrofit that will not make any significant difference in the air quality - basically, a waste of monein the air quality - basically, a waste of money.

PM Turnbull, is there any significant difference between this event, in mainly coal - powered NSW, and the event the day before, in more renewables - powered SA?

Advised on pioneering work in relation to a significant difference of opinion on the interpretation of a key power, resulting in negotiating a separate funding agreement.

Our study was powered to detect significant differences in pregnancy rates in comparisons between the control group, clinic access, and either of the 2 treatment groups.

This matching method has been shown to be superior to simple and stratified randomization in producing balance for separate prognostic variables, particularly when the number of strata is large compared with the number of subjects.36 Based on 0.8 power to detect significant differences between conditions (P =.05, 1 - sided), this procedure was used to randomize 101 subjects to DBT (n = 52) or to CTBE (n = 49).

To begin, in sibling abuse there is usually a power disparity as a result of significant difference in age, physical size, or strength between the two.

The required sample size is 76 women in each study group to have a statistical significant difference with a power of 80 % and an alpha - level set at 0.05 (two - sided).

(We can not conclude that this is a statistically significant difference, as the low base rate of serious suicide attempts precludes adequate power in any single - site clinical trial.)

A one - way ANOVA revealed no significant differences between groups on instrumental care, F (3,76) = 1.84, p =.15, although the low sample size in the Fearful group limited the power to detect differences.

No significant differences were found regarding the subscales of SDQ or the Total Difficulties score, between parents with different marital status, or level of education (recoded into high or low to increase the power in the analyses), with two exceptions.

In addition, the power to detect significant differences for small to medium effect sizes was limited because of the relatively small cell sizes, particularly for satisfied couples with a depressed husband.

The internal consistency of the CBCL in our sample, specifically the School subscale, was somewhat low, reducing statistical power (Bacon, 2004); however, our sample size and matched design provided enough power to uncover as statistically significant even small differences between the groups on this measure.

Most studies were small and none of the studies reported a power calculation to estimate the number of individuals required in order to detect a significant difference in effect for the outcomes measured.

The finding that curative interventions are more effective than preventive interventions may be explained by a lower prevalence of child maltreatment in at - risk families / the general population than in maltreating families, making it «more difficult» to find significant differences between intervention and control groups (because of lower statistical power) and consequently, to prove the effectiveness of an intervention.