Sentences with phrase «since authoring a paper»

Since authoring a paper on the subject in 2011 in which he outlined seven main barriers, or dragons, he has found many more.

Not exact matches

Authored by incoming federal trade commissioner Rohit Chopra as he awaited Senate confirmation for his new post, the paper marks the first comprehensive attempt to rethink federal anti-corruption policy in years — maybe since the Watergate era.

Since 2006, she has co-ordinated the review process, written to authors for additional information, managed data for the review, re-extracted data from papers, re-entered data into Review Manager, re-entered data for the included studies section, analysed and interpreted data, and provided a clinical and policy perspective.

Since climate change is already leading to higher average temperatures overall, the finding that extremes are also more likely was not surprising, said Sophie Lewis, a climate scientist at the University of Melbourne and the climate system science center and the lead author on the paper.

Since arriving at Bates, she has authored or co-authored six research papers and eight successful proposals for research and instrumentation grants.

«We hypothesized that long - term yogurt intake might reduce the risk of cardiovascular problems since some previous small studies had shown beneficial effects of fermented dairy products,» said one of the paper's authors, Justin Buendia.

The ability to both fly and drive is useful in environments with a lot of barriers, since you can fly over ground obstacles and drive under overhead obstacles, says PhD student Brandon Araki, lead author on the paper.

The change — a subject of much scientific debate at the time and since — made no sense, says Runyon, lead author of a short paper making the pro-Pluto argument that will be presented next week at a scientific conference in Texas.

In a paper published in The Lancet on July 27, first author Sallis and colleagues found that since the 2012 Olympics more countries have been monitoring activity levels and have drafted national policies to combat the problem, but the plans are operational in only 56 percent of countries.

«We are pleased that the authors have chosen Applied Materials Today to publish their work; since its launch several months ago the journal has received very high quality papers for review and hope to see this trend continue.»

«Since we were genetically deleting the ERK1 / 2 pathway, we expected to see less cell proliferation,» said Petrus R. de Jong, MD, PhD, a co-first author on the paper.

Philipp Keller, who is the lead author of the paper and has joined Howard Hughes Medical Institute since completing the study, compares the process to reconstructing a landscape seen through a blizzard.

«It has been hypothesized, since these cells are found at sites of age - related pathologies, that they are related to the development of these pathologies,» says biologist Jan van Deursen of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, lead author of the new paper.

The highly cited paper has been under scrutiny ever since the last author, Paolo Macchiarini, has been facing allegations of misconduct, which most recently led to Macchiarini's dismissal from the Karolinska Institutet.

It seems very strange that the journal allows for authors to retract their names from the paper, especially since this seems to include also the «Contributors» section, wherein is said who did what (I don't see their names there and I know that they were there earlier).

Since we reported Friday that multiple authors had asked to remove their names from a high - profile 2011 Lancet paper about a risky transplant surgery, a few readers have wondered: Should this be allowed?

Dozens of these so - called tidal disruption events have been detected since the 1990s, but none that remained bright for nearly as long as this one,» Dacheng Lin, a research scientist at the University of North Hampshire and the lead author of the paper, said in a statement.

While the HARPS data has been available since 2006, the team re-examined the data using a set of algorithms called HARPS - TERRA developed by the paper's lead - author Guillem Anglada - Escudé of the University of Göttingen, and Paul Butler of the Carnegie Institute for Science.

In the response by raypierre - I agree about the problems with simple energy balance model and its lack of spatial representation, but it's tough to fault the authors for the lack of cloud detail, since the science is not up to the task of solving that problem (and doing so would be outside the scope of the paper; very few paleoclimate papers that tackle the sensitivity issue do much with clouds).

It gives you far higher per - book earnings than traditionally published authors are receiving (even those whose ebooks are selling for $ 10 +), it gives the readers a deal when compared to most traditionally published ebooks, and it's often considered a fair price by those who feel that digital books should cost less than the dead - tree variety since paper, ink, and shipping aren't a part of the equation.

«My fans have been clamoring for the return of Dunk & Egg ever since the graphic novels of «The Hedge Knight» and «The Sworn Sword» went out of print several years ago,» said author George R.R. Martin, «so I am delighted to announce that Jet City Comics is bringing them back — newly formatted for digital readers, and in paper for those who still prefer the traditional formats.

By the author of the acclaimed bestseller Benjamin Franklin, this is the first full biography of Albert Einstein since all of his papers have become available.

Since building abstract writing is only done when the whole paper is finished, most authors find it hard to bring together all key information as they do not know the strategies.

Since the time the first writers put quill to paper, pen names have been used by authors.

Since authors cultivate their own bitterness and joy before pouring it onto paper or digital page long before money gets involved, their creativity clearly familiarizes them with freedom to overcome challenges.

As my colleagues Fei Mei Chan and Craig Lazzara pointed out in a recent paper they authored, Much Ado About Interest Rates, «Since yields peaked in 1981, the three subsequent decades have witnessed a remarkable bull Read more -LSB-...]

As my colleagues Fei Mei Chan and Craig Lazzara pointed out in a recent paper they authored, Much Ado About Interest Rates, «Since yields peaked in 1981, the three subsequent decades have witnessed a remarkable bull market for bonds.

Since joining the Gallery in 1986, she has organized, collaborated on, and coordinated numerous exhibitions as well as authored and contributed to various catalogues: Three Centuries of American Prints from the National Gallery of Art (2016), Louise Bourgeois: No Exit (2015), Focus on the Corcoran: Works on Paper: 1860 - 1990 (2015), Yes, No, Maybe: Artists Working at Crown Point Press (2013), Shock of the News (2012), Stanley William Hayter: From Surrealism to Abstraction (2009), Cotton Puffs, Q - Tips ®, Smoke and Mirrors: The Drawings of Ed Ruscha (2005), Roy Lichtenstein: A New Gift of Drawings (2005), Drawings of Jim Dine (2004), A Century of Drawings: Works on Paper from Degas to LeWitt (2001), The Unfinished Print (2001), Prints Abound: Paris in the 1890s, from the Collections of Virginia and Ira Jackson and the National Gallery of Art (2001), Marc Chagall's Early Prints and Drawings (1995), The Great Age of British Watercolors: 1750 - 1880 (1993), Drawings from the O'Neal Collection (1993), Käthe Kollwitz (1992), Master Drawings from the Armand Hammer Collection: An Inaugural Celebration (1989), and English Drawings and Watercolors, 1630 - 1850 (1988).

He has been lead author since January 2015 of the catalogue raisonné Mark Rothko: The Works on Paper.

I am aware of one paper from the CalCOFI program which did utilize regular Secchi disk measurements to carefully discern a slight, long - term shoaling of Secchi depth since the 1940s (Aksnes and Ohman, 2009), and these authors were cautious not to attribute this changes to any single factor such as a long - term increase in phytoplankton biomass.

Update, June, 9, 8:51 p.m. Having been on the run overseas since the weekend, I'm only now catching up with Anthony Watts's attack on Tom Peterson, one of the authors of a recent National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration climate paper.

The 78 - author paper, published Sunday in Nature Geoscience, used a variety of indirect indicators of temperature, from tree rings to pollen grains, to build on other work charting temperature shifts since the end of the last ice age — including the recent Marcott et al paper, explored here, which used seabed sediments to chart 11,000 years of temperatures.

I'm not the most qualified to make a judgment on their scientific work, but the two authors seem eager to attribute those measurments to an increase of solar irradiance since 1980, though no serious discussion about the other possible mechanisms (like atmospheric changes) is made in the paper.

I therefore anticipated that the paper would be corrected at the proof stage since I didn't expect the authors to want to put something incorrect into the literature.

«If you look at the Sierra Nevada as a whole, by far the largest portion hasn't seen a fire since the 1910s and 1920s, which is very unnatural,» said Safford, who has authored several papers on the increasing wildlife severity across California's mountain ranges.

Another head of the hydra was a 2009 paper by John McLean, Chris de Freitas and Bob Carter published in JGR in the innoccuously titled «Influence of the Southern Oscillation on Tropospheric Temperature», the authors claimed that el nino drove essentially all variations to global temperature — a distinctly odd claim since almost nothing in climate science has been mroe closely studied than the relationship between el nino and global climate.

Both authors even admitted that their reconstructions aren't statistically valid (and that was kind of their point...) and McIntyre, at least, has stated that he regards many studies since then the same way he does the original 1998 paper because they basically use the same datasets and analysis (And I should add that he seems less opposed to the more recent studies, especially those that don't use data he finds suspicious...) They've stated their a priori reasons why they don't like the data they don't like.

This paper draws on my experiences as an IPCC author since 1994.

Wouldn't it be much easier to simply email a survey to the authors of the «12000 papers» and ask the specific question: «Are you convinced that since 1950, mankind's CO2 emissions are responsible for at least 50 % of the increase in global temperature?»

I was referring to the «pipeline» paper, which he co-authored in 2005, in which the authors postulate that half of the warming since 1880 was «still in the pipeline».

Apart from the Georgieva et al. paper being poor science itself, the authors go to some length to try to show that solar activity is not the primary driver as it does not not match the temperature evolution since the 1970s: http://www.leif.org/research/Georgieva-Temp-SSN.png

This paper is a «case study» which looked at the mid-century cooling in Indiana, specifically in the summer months (June, July, and August) since the authors were also interested in any change in climate during the growing season.

As an example of how one - sided the chapter authors could be in their reviews, let us consider the discussion of urbanization bias, since this is a topic which we have written a series of three papers on (summary here).

He is the author / co-author of five books including a Short Guide to Environmental Policy (2014), Environmentalism Since 1945 (2013), Urban Air Pollution in Asian Cities (2006), World Transport Policy and Practice (2003) as well as numerous academic papers and policy reports.

The thinking of the authors has also evolved somewhat since the 2006 paper.

Since my comment, the authors have referred to their previous (2013) paper, which I was already familiar with.

The authors gave reasoned arguments for using OLS regression, stating additionally that — since OLS regression is liable to underestimate Y, and hence overestimate S — doing so reinforced the main conclusion of the paper, that climate sensitivity is relatively low.

When Oxburgh makes an ever - so - gentle rebuke of «presentations of this work by the IPCC and others» who «have sometimes neglected to highlight this issue» it's disingenuous, since Mann and the CRU guys were the authors both of the underlying papers and the IPCC chapter alike.

according to paper 1, the paper by Ramanathan entitled «Trace - Gas Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming», the author states on page 3 (which is really labeled page 189 since it was in a larger journal i guess) under the section Anthropogenic Enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect — «an increase in greenhouse gas such as CO2 will lead to a further reduction in OLR.»

This is a little bit silly, since the authors titled an entire section of their paper The trigger for deglacial warming, discussing that the first warming (of the Arctic 19,000 years ago) was indeed triggered by orbital cycles.