Furthermore,
since the death and resurrection of Jesus was central to Christian belief and practice, and since teaching was often done with the help of symbols, it probably became customary as a part of nearly every meal where Christians were gathered, to remind people that the bread they were eating represented the body of Jesus which was broken for them, and the wine they were drinking represented His blood.
Since death and resurrection have long been central Christian themes, Christianity is well prepared for the task of letting its old conventional self die, in order to rise again as a facet of a new global religion.7
Not exact matches
that is, the Old Testament as a history of how people lived before Christ
and the New Testament as the instructions for how they can live
since the birth,
death,
and resurrection of Christ..
With the
death and resurrection of Jesus, a new green shoot of a new Kingdom sprouted up from the midst of the ashes of Satan's kingdom,
and has been growing ever
since, even to this very day.
And since our hope is to participate in his Resurrection life, and since we clearly can not expect to be raised in our fleshly bodies, then our resurrection from death (which will not be physical) can not be different in kind from h
And since our hope is to participate in his
Resurrection life, and since we clearly can not expect to be raised in our fleshly bodies, then our resurrection from death (which will not be physical) can not be different in ki
Resurrection life,
and since we clearly can not expect to be raised in our fleshly bodies, then our resurrection from death (which will not be physical) can not be different in kind from h
and since we clearly can not expect to be raised in our fleshly bodies, then our
resurrection from death (which will not be physical) can not be different in ki
resurrection from
death (which will not be physical) can not be different in kind from his.
Certainly, the
death and resurrection of Jesus are central to the Gospel, but
since there is so much Biblical information that is part of the Gospel, one does not have to believe the entire Gospel to be justified.
God has never poured out His wrath on this Earth
since Jesus
death and resurrection.
I think it is,
since the chronology of the nativity story are closely related to the
death and resurrection of Jesus, i. e the sign of Jonah, the only sign Jesus gave.
Since rereading 1 Corinthians 15 during these days of quiet bereavement I have been more than usually sensitive to the New Testament image of
death as sleep, to the several connotations
and implications of words in the Bible that speak of sleeping
and awakening, perishing
and quickening,
death and resurrection.
Since the Greeks (as indeed most of the ancient world though often in vague
and undefined ways) were accustomed to think of
death in terms of the survival of an immaterial soul, the Jewish emphasis on the
resurrection of the fleshly body seemed not only unnecessary, but unspiritual
and even repellent.
He was strongly opposed to the teaching of some of his Christian contemporaries who wished to interpret the idiom of
resurrection as an allegorical description of that Christian experience by which «a man, having come to the truth, has been reanimated
and revivified to God,
and, the
death of ignorance being dispelled, has as it were burst forth from the tomb of the old man».35 Tertullian was adamant that the
resurrection was in the future
and to be understood in physical, fleshly terms («I pronounce that the flesh will certainly rise again»).36 In order to forestall those who could contend the impossibility of such a hope on the grounds that the decayed corpse would have long
since wasted away to nothing, he pointed out that quite recently, in his city, skeletons some five hundred years old had been unearthed in a remarkable state of preservation.
The Hebrew passage isn't teaching that a person can lose their salvation, but that if it were possible to lose your salvation you could never get it back
since it would mean Jesus would have to be crucified all over again which is not going to happen because His
death and resurrection are sufficient to save
and keep a person saved for all eternity.
You could tell someone to believe in Jesus for everlasting life without ever mentioning sin, spiritual
death, a substitutionary atonement
since these are just fluff or evidences yet they might be a stumbling block so if you just harp on eternal life isn't that neglecting the
death and resurrection.
Finally, he taught (
and demonstrated through his
resurrection) that
death is not the end for God's children
since the children of God would inherit eternal life.
Tim Nichols argued that
since nobody would ever dream of not presenting the
death and resurrection, the question doesn't really matter.
That said, I don't consider an observation of Yule (fact: this was a Germanic pagan tradition LONG before the birth of Christ) or Eostre / Ishtar / Easter (all sorts of convoluted Roman
and pagan traditions regarding celebration of spring
and death /
resurrection were happening around this time of year prior to Christ's existence) to be favoring one religion over another,
since so many different religions are involved in those mixes.
In Jesus this
resurrection was uniquely striking, because it was experienced by his followers immediately after his
death,
and it has continued to be a part of the Christian faith experience ever
since.
This is revealed in the «mature manhood» of Jesus Christ (his life,
death,
and resurrection),
since he overcame the confusion, anxiety,
and division within man's nature.
oh yea
since the NGP is capable of playing ps3 games i want: Heavenly Sword:
Resurrection PS3 / NGP after years of being
death for using the sword she swore to protect with her life, nariko is granted with a new opportunity to defend the same sword she once protected from evil, play as Nariko in this ground breaking new adventure, a new way to play games on your home console
and your portable console, coming exclusively to PS3 / NGP thank you lol