Since paper applications are going the way of the dinosaur in favor of digital job postings, it only seems logical to have more automated recruitment processes.
Not exact matches
I'm not exaggerating, you literally have to do the same procedure as if you're a new customer and MAIL the same
application in AGAIN and wait a few weeks — This cost me a few thousand according to the
paper trade I had to make
SINCE I COULD N'T TRADE OPTIONS IN TIME.
I had one
paper reviewed 11 times and it was rejected on the basis of the one bad review by someone who had lifted entire paragraphs of a grant
application I had written and then submitted as their own and then used (
since they were on the committee I had applied to) to get the grant.
Any court in the world would defend such a cut and paste as a legitimate
application of the «fair use» doctrine of Copyrights, especially,
since you have already made such use by linking to Professor Johnson's
paper.
Appellants are advised to communicate the views of respondents to the Registry
since, if they raise no objection, the
application may be dealt with on
paper.
Americo — similar to United Home Life
since they also do a maximum of $ 10,000 with a whole life policy that is usually completed with a
paper application.
In some ways this makes the process easier, I think,
since many find it laborious to fill out
paper applications by hand.
In fact, 99 % of those
applications get into the «no» pile
since the majority of hiring managers just can't finish reading those predictable and hackneyed
papers till the very end.