Since public consensus was the ideal, it was thought best to be low - key, entirely civil, and broadly inclusive about one's faith.
Not exact matches
Since so much information was presented, no
consensus was reached on any particular approach, but another
public meeting will be scheduled, featuring a panel of local architects, land - use planners and engineers.
It is noteworthy that the
consensus hardliners are strongest in the USA, particularly
since public opinion there seems to be the most skeptical (an August 2011 Rasmussen poll showed that close to 70 % of respondents believed that climate scientists were fudging the data).
So a reasonable, direct from the source, bit of evidence that the «creative» tools of PR are being used by government and the UN, (futerra
since 2001) see their client list (Greenpeace, etc) has / is being used to «win'the AGW
consensus amongst the
public..
Since the topics are so sensitive we would have Chatham House rules unless the
consensus desires otherwise; and there would be some
public report of the proceedings.
Member states are normally given a margin of appreciation regarding the assessment of where a fair balance lies in a case, between the
public and private interests involved, and, as the Grand Chamber said this «will also usually be a wide margin», in a case like this in particular
since there is no
consensus in member states.
Since there doesn't seem to be any purpose behind the OWS, I think there is a growing «
consensus» outside of the OWS that perhaps it is time that this «movement» no longer be continued at the
public expense.