«
Skeptical climate researchers have discovered extensive manipulation of the data within the U.S. Government's two primary climate centers: the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) in Asheville, North Carolina and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) at Columbia University in New York City.»
Not exact matches
Climate scientist Steven Sherwood of the University of New South Wales, who proposed the 35 - degree survivability limit, said he was
skeptical that this threshold could be reached as soon as the
researchers say.
The e-mails, attributed to prominent American and British
climate researchers, include discussions of scientific data and whether it should be released, exchanges about how best to combat the arguments of skeptics, and casual comments — in some cases derisive — about specific people known for their
skeptical views.
Some commenters
skeptical of the severity of projected
climate change have recently seized on two sources to argue that the
climate may be less sensitive than many scientists say and the impacts of
climate change therefore less serious: A yet - to - be-published study from Norwegian
researchers, and remarks by James Annan, a
climate scientist with the Japan Agency for Marine - Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC).
As to the ethics of
climate disaster
researchers, and the credibility of their models, data and reports, ClimateGate emails reveal that
researchers used various «tricks» to mix datasets and «hide the decline» in average global temperatures since 1998; colluded to keep
skeptical scientific papers out of peer - reviewed journals; deleted potentially damaging or incriminating emails; and engaged in other practices designed to advance manmade
climate change alarms.