Sentences with phrase «slaw comment»

The Lawyers Weekly article that Omar refers to also quotes from a Slaw comment about the Waldman lawsuit, attributing the words to «one lawyer commenting on the Slaw legal weblog» rather than a specific person.

Given that the LW writer quoted from a Slaw comment, we're entitled to assume she read the Slaw lead article and all of the comments.

The 20 December 2005 judgment of Judge John Jones in Kitzmiller v. Dover School District (here in PDF, 139 pages) is worthwhile reading (and was briefly mentioned in an earlier SLAW comment on a different topic).

http://blog.lesaonline.org/ The time stamp (Alberta time) on this is 10 minutes after your Slaw Comment.

And somehow more directly than via Slaw comments.

Well Google has been the subject of many Slaw comments, but it's on the legal side that it's hit the news recently.

One of the reasons I love checking Lektora for Slaw comments!

Well, I've made a few changes recently, and started to use the RSS feed for Slaw Comments.

I welcome Slaw comments and thoughts.

Not exact matches

I hope you love this slaw as much as the first one, and when you make it let me know what you think in the comments below!

Before you fill my comment box that the purpose of crack slaw is to be low carb alternative to egg rolls, I decided to make it both ways.

There's a lot involved here, so I'll have to comment in more detail within my Slaw article, but the economics of $ 40,000 / month per 1,000 visitors — remember that's visitors and not clients — is very poor.

It will be very important for people like the members of Slaw, i.e. sophisticated users of legal information systems, to comment.

Of course Slaw gets lots of comments — because we have lots of contributors talking amongst ourselves which makes others feel a bit more comfortable to join in.

The easiest way of replying to your statements is to ask that you read the articles cited in my comment, and the other relevant articles listed on my SSRN author's page, at: http://ssrn.com/author=1398484; and listed on my Slaw author's page, at: http://www.slaw.ca/author/chasse/ However, I offer the following few comments, but each requires the fuller explanation as set out in those articles.

While some have defended the Statement (see Omar Ha - Redeye here on SLAW and Renatta Austin's comments on The Current) most commentary has been harshly... [more]

Five and a half years ago, I wrote a comment on Slaw questioning why the Canada Elections Act precluded most non-resident Canadians from voting.

The problem, however, as Anne Vespry cogently argued on our legal ethics listserv (and «Bob Smith» also noted in comments on Omar Ha - Redeye's SLAW column), is that it is not clear that there is a legal basis for claiming that Ontario lawyers have a duty to promote equality, diversity and inclusion understood as a requirement to take active steps toward making the profession more equal, diverse and inclusive.

While some have defended the Statement (see Omar Ha - Redeye here on SLAW and Renatta Austin's comments on The Current) most commentary has been harshly critical.

[25] Bradley Wright, January 20, 2016 (8:00 pm), comment on Karen Dyck, «Innovating Regulation on the Prairies,» Slaw, January 20, 2016, http://www.slaw.ca/2016/01/20/innovating-regulation-on-the-prairies/.

Add to that the more than 10,000 comments you've given us, and the Slaw community has produced the equivalent of something like 66 novels.

We do not moderate comments on Slaw in the sense that we do not preview them before their publication; we do, however, promptly delete those that we find to be objectionable in one way or another — typically because they are simply attempts to promote the commenter's business.

In sum, with a rate of apparently anonymous commenting at around 10 %, I'm persuaded that it's not a problem on Slaw.

Quite a bit; until 2010 mixed martial arts was illegal in Ontario; however, a regulatory change announced last August and commented on here at Slaw at the time was implemented last Autumn and allowed for this multi-million dollar... [more]

With your indulgence, I'd like to ask Slaw readers to comment (via this blog or via Twitter @CanLII) on what manner of legal scholarship they want to see and what role if any they see for CanLII.

If you currently enjoy the discussion here at Slaw via RSS, you may also wish to add the comments feed for your feed reader.

Those who get Slaw's entries by RSS or email may not regularly read comments to our posts and so might have missed a rather important, laconic comment to my entry yesterday on the New York Times's deep linking feature.

See the «public comment version» of the draft 2nd edition of the Sedona Canada Principles, cited in my Slaw post, for Feb. 12, 2015: «Electronic Discovery: The Concept and Purpose of the Sedona Canada Principles 2nd Edition» (http://goo.gl/L8cfMA).

I think the second StatsCan graph, headed \ Violent crime rate, 1962 to 2007 \, at this source is of assistance (source here, for some reason Slaw keeps translating quote marks in my comments as backslashes, which corrupts the hyperlink — anyone interested in viewing the graph should click on the link and then delete the final backslash from their address bar — or just go to the StatsCan Daily for July 17, 2008).

As valid as that comment may be in the legal sphere generally, I would suggest that he check out Slaw to determine its validity here.

You can subscribe to the comments on Slaw either as a separate matter (RSS, email) or as part of a subscription combining posts and... [more]

These comments and developments were what I had in mind when I made my largely unsuccessful attempts to generate a discussion on Slaw of what good research is or to explore the ideas of Robert Pirsig in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.

A teacher and an author, John will add much lustre to Slaw and certainly knows how to provoke us into a discussion: his mild, short first comment on CanLII has rapidly turned into the hottest thread here in quite a while.

This is heartwarming for those of us who post to Slaw: your comments, whatever their complexion, are our rewards, and you've been bountiful.

We've reached a new milestone here on Slaw: comment number ten thousand.

Ben Schorr mentioned the case on Slaw recently, starting with the comment that «One thing has become clear in the last few months: Hollywood has declared war on the Internet.»

And finally, thank - you for the comments you've been submitting to Slaw Emmanuel, it's this type of conversation that keeps us all engaged.

Constructive criticism is important to a lawyer's development, and thoughtful comments from Slaw's wide and wise readership will no doubt help to encourage these and other students to pursue the difficult ethical matters they raise.

Comments are welcome on the posts themselves, or here at Slaw.

Although I suspect someone on SLAW has likely already commented on what follows, I couldn't easily find a post (although Simon Fodden's post here in 2008 discusses CanLII's Database Search).

Many thanks, Simon, for the plug and your generous (as always) comments — Slaw has been Law21's biggest booster since its launch, and I really appreciate the tremendous support from Slaw's authors and readers!

I also pose a question for Slaw readers» comments.

That blog generated more comments than anything I have written for Slaw and it led to numerous articling students, as well as one parent of an articling student, writing to me privately to share their experiences about articling.

Slaw's RSS feed for comments hasn't been working properly, for some people at least, for the last four or five days, for reasons that we don't yet understand.

And curiously, as I reached the millennial mark, we as a group were also reaching a pair of important milestones (should say «kilostones» I guess): there have been 3003 posts to Slaw since its inception, and 4010 comments made on those posts.

We do not moderate comments on Slaw in the sense that we do not preview them before their publication; we do, however, promptly delete those that we find to be objectionable in one way or... [more]

First, take the time to work through the comments at the bottom of the Slaw article.

This may be mere self - reflection for Slaw, but I think it will be interesting some time from now to be able to look back and actually see the posts we made in a particular week and to have access to the various links referred to in the posts and comments... [more]

I searched the SLAW archives for the phrase «open access,» and Simon's two posts here and here (attracting no comments) were the only results.

It would appear that the RSS feed for Slaw has been hacked and an advertising link inserted at the top of both the post and comment feeds.