Therefore, the Constitutional Court expressed the view that matters of social security and claims following from them did not in the
case of so - called
Slovak pensions contain a foreign element which is a prerequisite for the application of the co-ordination regulation.
[3] On the basis of the applicant's cassation appeal with the Supreme Administrative Court by order dated 9.5.2012, No. 6 Ads 18/2012 -82, reversed in accordance with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the interpretation of European Union law on the Court and presented him the following questions: 6 Ads 18/2012 First Excludes Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes nazaměstna not persons and their families moving within the Community (Regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present
case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing
pension defunct State (Czech and
Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and
Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods
Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Republic?
On 9 May, the Supreme Administration Court in another
case related to
Slovak pensions decided to submit set of preliminary questions to the ECJ, reacting to the Constitutional Court's decision (6 Ads 18/2012).