Sentences with phrase «small money because»

These flexible points are fantastic for Big Travel with Small Money because you can transfer them directly to 19 AMEX airline or hotel partners, including Air Canada, Delta, and Singapore Airlines!

Credit cards that earn miles & points are often the best way to get Big Travel with Small Money because they can get you award flights and hotel award stays.

Not exact matches

Try and see what fits your business, he says, because even small security improvements could save you time and money in the long run.

However, Google will let publishers store cached versions of their news articles in Google's servers, which Ubl said will benefit small publishers because they don't necessarily have the money or expertise to do the job themselves.

«Staying smaller means you can control your risk because you don't have to actually lay out money for the costs of growing.»

«Improving small - business opportunities through federal contracts creates jobs and saves taxpayer money because small businesses bring competition, innovation and lower prices.»

One small - business owner came to Kay because he was extremely controlling with money, and his wife was getting frustrated with the behavior.

He says the symbolism is valid because it targets the «differential treatment of debt» and how money has influenced politics such that «big borrowers got their debt forgiven, small borrowers got their houses taken away from them.»

In the case of the small business, most if not all of the company's profits are used to pay salaries and fringe benefits, which are deductible, and double taxation may be avoided because no money is left over for distributing dividends.

In the case of the small business, though, double taxation may not be a consideration, because most, if not all of the company's profits are reinvested in the business or go to pay salaries and fringe benefits, which are deductible, and no money is left over for distributing dividends.

«Getting funding for a cannabis business presents very unique challenges because you can't just get an SBA, or small business loan, and banks are not going to lend money to you either,» Super Bowl champion and cannabis entrepreneur Marvin Washington told me during an interview for my book with Entrepreneur Media, Start Your Own Cannabis Business.

That, just because you have a little shop on Main Street selling crafts or coffee or whatever knickknacks, people should spend their money with you just because they're «thinking small»?

Keller points out that one of the reasons to own a franchise in the first place is because owners almost always make money when they sell; but in the U.S. most teams aren't making profits from attendance and TV revenues are small compared to other leagues, all of which dampens buyer interest.

In Texas, it was not a sense of guilt over paying money to watch majestic orca whales prevented from swimming freely at sea because they're forced to perform tricks in comparatively small enclosures at the behest of misguided trainers who could very well be maimed when SeaWorld's whales are eventually driven insane by the hopelessness of their situation that kept audiences away earlier this year.

That's because there isn't enough money in covering and reporting on small - caps, so research firms and Wall Street banks avoid the stocks.

While this is often touted as a great source of money to start a business, it's not, because most start - ups simply don't qualify as you'll see in The Truth About Small Business Grants in Canada.

Some people will support a campaign with a small donation at a lower reward tier because they do want the product if it is made however don't want to commit too much money at this stage.

Keeping an eye on the performance of small - cap stocks during and after market corrections is crucial because institutional money flow into the small - cap arena indicates an increasing demand and appetite for risk among «smart money» investors.

I would be remiss if I didn't mention these people as potential sources of a small business loan, because so many small business owners and would - be entrepreneurs get the money they need to start or carry on their enterprise from these folk that I listed it as the second most popular source of small business loans in my article, 8 Sources of Business Start Up Mmoney they need to start or carry on their enterprise from these folk that I listed it as the second most popular source of small business loans in my article, 8 Sources of Business Start Up MoneyMoney.

The only way to make consistent money as a trader is to have small losses (because you will have losses so better to keep them small) and a few big winners in between.

Additional stabilization from unemployment insurance, although smaller in total magnitude than that from the tax system, is estimated to be eight times as effective per dollar of lost revenue because more of the money is spent rather than saved.

Because these have short term trades, you can turn over more cash — and more profits — but because they allow you to start with small amounts of money per trade, you are not taking on as much risk as you would with a huge day trade in the stock Because these have short term trades, you can turn over more cash — and more profits — but because they allow you to start with small amounts of money per trade, you are not taking on as much risk as you would with a huge day trade in the stock because they allow you to start with small amounts of money per trade, you are not taking on as much risk as you would with a huge day trade in the stock market.

Not only will Whole Foods be able keep construction costs relatively low, it can also save money on occupancy costs because of the smaller size of the stores — thus achieving higher returns on capital.

Because they trade at such low prices, even a small amount of money can buy hundreds or thousands of shares.

One year I went over the limit by just a few dollars because the college paid a small stipend when I developed an online course; the penalty for that was loss of an entire month's SS benefit, right at Christmastime when I really needed the money.

Then they would hope they can restore velocity to the money which is why Larry Summers said to get rid of the $ 100 bill because it's much harder to hoard currencies with smaller denominations because if you're hiding them under your mattress, it doesn't take that much money to give you sleepless nights.

Conversely, money tends to flow out of small caps and into more «safe» blue chips when there is more uncertainty in the environment because investors become more conservative.

Managing lots of money acts as an anchor on returns because the opportunity set becomes smaller when managing more money.

Diao added that while cash transfers have been used in humanitarian contexts before, this initiative is a significant departure from the status quo because they're giving families transformative amounts of money versus small, subsistence amounts.

When you're dealing with big clients, he's paying hundreds of thousands of dollars, but the headache you're getting from small clients can be much bigger, because for him $ 5 is like the last money.»

Obviously, we know our readers are smart and will only buy items that make sense for them, but we do include product links when appropriate (products we use or like) because any small amount of money earned through affiliate links help make it possible for us to continue to build new content on this blog and offer more value to our readers.

The «big money» is often a sign of «sharps» — and causes reverse line movement because the larger, smart, money — overwhelms the large majority of the bets by the general Public (which often bets smaller amounts).

Just something to think about and to kick around... Arsenal would be a great club if AW was replaced, the Directors left The team was totally replaced... because they're all AW's players and thus mediocre We could find another T. Henry, Vieira, Pires and co We could use all the money to buy the best players in the world Just these small changes would GUARANTEE a continuous stream of PL and EC wins Shame our club would still be stuck with its c..

Yes, there is a great demand for success amongst the top clubs because the game at that level generates ludicrous amounts of money no small part of which comes from fans pockets.

Take a good look at wengers signings half of then are average players because he is always ready to settle down for top four and and early CL exit unlike Diego simeone who signs players from no where with relatively small money and push for trophy every season.

We have a small reserve for calamities but that's normal because no bank would give us money without real collateral.

If anything it makes it seems to make it worse because they spend so much money and time promoting their small handful of stars that amazing match - ups like this one somehow fly under the radar.

All that would take is for MLB to get 30 different business interests to give up the particulars of their disparate TV rights and gate receipts and pool them for the common good, even though the current revenue - sharing system is already pissing off the big - market teams because the small - market teams aren't spending enough of that money.

Also English players cost a lot because every team has to have a certain number of English players The talent pool is small so the best British players cost money.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

We CAN compete with ute and chelsea, its just that players do not want to join arsenal because they know the LACK OF AMBITION and thats what makes the club smaller club that chelsea and ute, not money.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Just like the stock market sometimes reacts in a non pragmatic manner, but even worse for the UFC «rankings» because it is based on a much smaller group of actors who are not even investing actual money in their decisions / opinions.

Southampton have been doing great since coming up from the Championship, the only reason they struggle is because of a small squad, they don't have the money we have..

It is unacceptable, wrong, illogical, unfair and borderline thieving that a manager earning so much money and failing years after years, is still on the job (and gibbering statements made of lies and untruth) and was rewarded with a new lucrative contract because he won (well the players did) a «little small insignificant» cup...!!

Sports Insights» analysts have monitored this game since Monday and our readers know that we like this kind of market action because it means that «big, smart money» has taken the Jaguars — overwhelming the more popular, but smaller, bets on the Saints.

You may have forked out a lot of money for the top of the line diaper covers that don't leak, but you can not fault the diaper company if there are leaks because baby is too small.

It also saves you a lot of money because items bought in bulk are cheaper compared to buying in smaller quantities.

It was easy to buy another pack of disposable diapers for $ 20.00 because it was a relatively small amount of money each time.

But make sure you move this money over to a savings account or even pull out a little cash because it's easy for small amounts of savings to get spent elsewhere.