Sentences with phrase «so labour need»

So Labour need to get to the disaffected voters who maybe voted Labour in the past and not anymore; they also need to get to those who are not even interested in politics.

Not exact matches

We think so, but we need convincing to believe that simply going to a labour based approach as proposed in the Jenkins report, along with decreasing the refundable portion of the credit over time are all that is needed to free up the monies and make the SR&ED incentives a truly effective instrument.

So if there are policies that would boost potential output — the sum of labour force growth and productivity growth — then we need to pursue them.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: «I think what we need in this country is something more robust like a War Powers Act so that governments do get held to account by Parliament for what they do in our name.»

Although Christ was filled with the form of God and rich in all good things, so that he needed no work and suffering to make him righteous and saved (for he had all this eternally), yet he was not puffed up by them and did not exalt himself above us and assume power over us, although he could rightly have done so; but, on the contrary, he so lived, laboured, worked, suffered, and died that he might be like other men and in fashion and in actions be nothing else than a man, just as if he had need of all these things and had nothing of the form of God.

Others have made a move to fewer packaging SKUs, using more one - size - fits - all materials (however much as needed) so that packaging decisions can be made faster and easier by untrained labour forces.

We were all so excited that my labour was progressing so quickly and decided that we needed to go to the hospital.

Your hospital bag needs to contain all the things you will need for the duration of your stay, so the items you might want in labour, such as lip balm, a comfy over sized t - shirt, your TENS machine and clothes and toiletries for after the birth.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recommends that induction of labour has a large impact on the health of women and their babies, and so needs to be clearly clinically justified.

So quite possibly you forced your baby to stay in a suboptimal environment, rather than consider induction of labour when your doctor first identified the need for intervention.

So you need antibiotics IN LABOUR to prevent the transmission of GBS, because it kills the bacteria in the vagina AT THE TIME OF DELIVERY.

So, how can a parent negotiate the need for supplementation if baby's weight drops rapidly in those few days due to possible due to the shedding of all that fluid during that labour?

My experience was so awful, I trained as a doula to try to provide women and partners with the emotional support that I needed and didn't get in labour.

[If you don't] You will have a higher section rate, so part of that is you need to be in attendance to keep the birth normal and some of it is just to have an opinion about the strip, some if it is literally where you feel like you're standing guard, not against bad people but against keeping the space for the woman private and without a lot of stuff going on around her that's going to distract her just being in her labour.

If the unborn baby shows signs of Rh hemolytic disease, early labour may need to be induced, so that the mother's antibodies do not destroy too many of the baby's red blood cells.

But if not, your midwife may recommend that your labour might need to be induced so as to reduce the risk of any infection.

Equally important is the need to change attitudes to birth so that women are encouraged to play a more active part in the birth of their babies instead of being subjected to clinical interventions designed to mitigate the adverse effects of labouring in a starkly unnatural environment.

I didn't really want one during my first labour but as it went on so long, my baby was back to back and a decent size for my small frame, I needed something a bit stronger than gas and air!

(A fault of New Labour was that, in 1996 - 97 it was sometimes good at broadening the sense of who was included in the nation to bring in those Tebbit seemed to reject, and its critics may not realise that this was important at the time, yet it also seemed to think it needed to reject those with an attachment to tradition or history to do so in the name of perennial New - ness.

High - risk activities need agglomerations of companies, so that labour mobility is neither too costly to employee

«So clients are going to have to think very creatively: where are the constituencies that Labour needs to win and how can clients» case be made relevant to Labour in 2017?»

David Blunkett, the former New Labour home secretary, says the debate so far has already established the need for «time to do this properly».

I've argued on my own blog (http://hands-of-the-many.blogspot.com/2010/05/next-labour-will-change-be-moderate-or.html) that New Labour represented an understandable compromise with the upper class so that the overwhelming hostility to the party in the press would be lessened, and the party could communicate its message to a wider audience - and then, build the coalition which brought the party to office, and enabled the much - needed social democratic reforms to take place.

In parallel to this measure, we would also need to see an important transfer of sovereignty to EU (or Eurozone) bodies so that they could work on the optimisation of the labour market across the EMU.

If the forecasters and betting markets are right in their central forecasts then Con + LD+DUP combined will be short of a majority and so a Labour led government should form if they can secure the support of the SNP and probably others, including the Liberal Democrats, will be needed too: a potentially messy and unstable situation but also one where there is sufficient similarity in ideological perspective for policy agreement on plenty of issues.

On the other hand, perhaps figures like John Reid were not being so foolish when they suggested Labour needed a stronger message on immigration and «aspiration» — that counter-intuitive code word for getting the poor to vote against their economic interests.

If they cocked this up so badly we need to hear a little less from them in the immediate future about their insights as to how Labour could win a general election, not that many offered much before beyond vague talk of the «centre ground».

The British Election Study survey evidence suggests that Scottish Labour MPs will not be saved by incumbency effects or tactical voting, so the party will primarily need to attract a significant number of their former voters back from the SNP.

Some may argue that Labour can afford to lose some support in its heartlands so long as it does well where it needs to win seats at the next general election.

Doubtless Labour will not recover in Scotland to (even) 2010 levels of support, but they do not need to do so in order to save the vast majority of their seats in Scotland.

Labour needs only the barest lead in the popular vote to win an overall majority: not so the Conservatives.

These are issues that need to be central to SEA's work and to Labour policy so this should be a great opportunity to explore them in detail.

The weakness of the Lib - Con government will make power so tantalisingly close that Labour may not experience the dark night of the soul it so desperately needs.

So yes I think the Labour party can win, but we need a really clear strong message.»

So worried are organisers that Labour officials have now emailed MPs urging them to use their social media accounts to drum up some much - needed publicity.

This restriction needs to be removed so that a democratic contest can be held when there is a vacancy for Leader of the Labour Party.

What ever happens after the next election, Labour needs to develop a strategy to radically de-bureaucratize the welfare state, so that every citizen can construct their own vision of the good life, and people don't feel subordinated to paternalist bureaucracies.

There were two incidents when loyal Scottish and Welsh Labour MPs were needed to vote through Labour government policies because so many of their English colleagues rebelled.

The Meeting felt strongly that the Labour Shadow Cabinet needed instead to rally behind the union link, as the unions were not only crucial historically to the success of the Labour Party (electorally and financially) but would continue to be so in the future.»

Accordingly, they expected the coalition government to prove so dreadful that people would soon see the error of their ways: Labour would not need to make any big changes in order to win the following election.

Most dangerously of all, they think the coalition will prove so unpopular that Labour will win the next election almost by default, without needing to change.

'' [Labour] has alarmed the public about our soaring national debt, alerted them to the tax rises needed to pay for it if Labour is re-elected, and so undermined confidence in the future,» said Mr Osborne.

«Boosting the quality and quantity of the construction labour force is critical to deliver the homes and infrastructure that the country needs, so the # 34m construction skills fund is a welcome policy.

That the Labour party should so loudly trumpet its contempt for personal privacy and the presumption of innocence, parading its violation of the European Court on Human Rights ruling on DNA retention as one of the top six reasons to vote for it, tells you everything you need to know about its attitude to civil liberties and the rule of law.

The discussions do not need to lead to a firm policy programme, but we need to find out what views on Labour's future direction exist within the Labour Movement so we can then have a meaningful leadership contest in which the candidates and those voting understand each other.

To do that, it needs to answer the question which Scottish Labour has so singularly failed to do (and for which it has paid, and continues to pay, a ferociously heavy price): what is it for?

«Labour supporters need to use their noddle and ask themselves why Cameron is fighting so hard for a No vote.

But if Labour emerges with 170 seats, the left would need Lewis and Maskell to pull through - plus one more, which is why Corbyn's insiders are so desperate to secure safe seats for allies like Katy Clark.

Tomorrow's NEC meeting will rule on whether the Labour leader will need to get nominations from 51 MPs so he can stand in the leadership election, or whether he goes on the ballot automatically.

Many feel that Derbyshire County Council will be the toughest nut to crack in local government for us on 4th June, but one needs to remember that Labour have not faced us when there has not been a General Election on the same day since 1993... and that was not a good year for Conservatives anyway!Accordingly, we have worked hard to establish a Shadow Cabinet, engage in active but constructive opposition and really get to grips with the workings of the County Council so that we can put our vision for the future in place quickly; to employ a cliché: «to hit the ground running».