So by analogy with Kolmogorov what is the problem of the statistical approach to climatology which is the only one possible as I have developped it above with the T = Ta + u model?
If the stadium - wave effect is to work in the climate system, it can only do
so by analogy at best.
Anyone who is skeptical or confused is going to have doubts,
so by analogy, you are effectively saying that all of those people are morons.
So by analogy of that we would expect the female Neandertal to be the most likely price to be looking for signs of gene flow, and it does not seem to be there so far.
Not exact matches
Consider a human
analogy: St. Augustine often spoke to his mother Monica in the second person, that is, in the I «Thou manner
so highly esteemed
by Marion.
The unicorn
analogy used
by so many atheists is truly apt.
I have produced this
analogy to prove that
so long as the book remains a palpable object, i.e.
so long as it is not replaced
by auto - vocalizing and kino - vocalizing representations, we must look to the field of the manufacture of books for basic innovations in the near future.
@KatMat: your
analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law
so everyone would live
by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs
I also believe that the idea of evolution or development is an essential key to a nonscholastic doctrine of
analogy, if only because it is the modern understanding of organic and historical evolution that brought to an end the scholastic idea of Being (as is
so brilliantly demonstrated
by Arthur O. Lovejoy in The Great Chain of Being).
The pastor proceeds
by analogy so that the person being challenged will come up with a self - judgment based on the person's own conscience.
The only way your
analogy can be made relevant is if all of Islam is represented
by the fundamentalist terrorists we are all
so familiar with.
The primary task of the exegete of the parables, then, is to set the parable in its original context in the ministry of Jesus
so that,
by an effort of historical imagination, he may grasp the crucial point of the parable itself and then find the parallel or
analogy to which it is directed.
(
By way of
analogy, I wouldn't ask you to relativise every statement not based on, say, non-empirical knowledge,
so I don't see why I should.)
Individual persons can be self - reflective and thus
by entering, in a sense, into a relationship with themselves, effect changes in their own practices;
so,
by analogy, can schools in their own fashion.
Sometimes it takes the form of a logical argument — a syllogistic proof or an argument based on
analogy — but more often it adopts the rhetorical style, calling on man to reflect upon himself and the wonderful world around him
so that
by means of such reflection he might know his Lord.
By the way I don't think the host is real,
so again your
analogy never gets off the ground.
To draw an
analogy, «I believe Mao Zedong was a great man because The Little Red Book says
so, and the reason I believe The Little Red Book is that it was written
by Mao Zedong, who was a great man.»
It would appear that Hartshorne is here depending, in effect, if not in
so many words, upon something like the distinction made in the Thomistic theory of
analogy between what is meant
by an analogical term (the res significata) and how the term means (its modus significandi)(Thomas Aquinas 1964, 56 - 59, 66 - 71).
By analogy, we may look at the surface of the ocean on a calm day and see waves, and even, if we
so choose, assess their amplitude and frequency.
If any of our psychical concepts really is a true
analogy, in that it applies primarily to God and only secondarily to ourselves, at least with respect to what is meant
by it, if not with respect to how it means, we, at any rate, neither are nor ever could be in the position of knowing it to be
so.
Well, it seems to have been «not
so muc... a supernatural external miracle but... the dawning internal realization that this life of Jesus reflected a new image of God, an image that defied the conventional wisdom, an image that called into question the exalted king as the primary
analogy by which God could be understood.»
5 The
analogy is imperfect because motile cells such as white blood cells are not connected to other cells and
so, according to this model, would be completely surrounded
by interstitial stuff.
The pattern is clear in the Epistles to the Romans, Galatians, Colossians, and Ephesians, and when it has been recognized in these clear examples, it can be traced
by analogy in other epistles, where it is not
so obvious at first sight; not only in epistles written
by Paul but in those written
by other authors as well.
Instead of beginning with an image derived from prophetic discourse, that of another voice behind the prophet's voice, and extending it
by analogy to narration, prescriptive saying, wisdom literature, hymnic compositions, and
so on, we are delivered from psychologizing interpretations of revelation to a sensitivity to the sense of the text, to the world - reference it opens up before it.
So I do believe in a God beyond the metaphysical categories illustrated in temporal process; but such a God is indeed beyond the categories and can not except
by devious
analogy be called individual, actual, knowledgeable, or a variety of other things Hartshorne attributes to his God.
I wonder whether the rational
analogy has not assumed too large a role in Newbigin's apologetics,
so large as to become the rule
by which faith acquits itself.
If our living well and helping others to do
so serves God, then,
by any reasonable
analogy in the use of «serves,» God acquires a value God would otherwise lack.
Hartshorne added a paragraph in A, expanding on the reference: Plato's mind - body
analogy, accepted
by a number of modern theists before I came to my view has not,
so far as I know; been carefully criticized.
I preordered through Amazon but am too tech dense to figure out how to photo the receipt,
so here is a cut & paste: Items Ordered Price 1 of: Gluten - Free on a Shoestring Bakes Bread: (Biscuits, Bagels, Buns, and More), Hunn, Nicole Condition: New Sold by: Amazon.com LLC $ 14.78 So many bread memories, no wonder bread has been used as an analogy for human love and nurturing for centurie
so here is a cut & paste: Items Ordered Price 1 of: Gluten - Free on a Shoestring Bakes Bread: (Biscuits, Bagels, Buns, and More), Hunn, Nicole Condition: New Sold
by: Amazon.com LLC $ 14.78
So many bread memories, no wonder bread has been used as an analogy for human love and nurturing for centurie
So many bread memories, no wonder bread has been used as an
analogy for human love and nurturing for centuries.
It's not as though your identity has been stolen as
by responding to a blog, it typically means you are a coward and need to use made up names
so that «your cover won't be blown» if that were to happen guys, it would very likely be the first time you've had anything «Blown» in your entire lives... Yep you get the
analogy: — RRB -.
«As the independence of members of the House of Commons has decreased under the system of party discipline — it is known as «whipping»
by analogy with the fox hunting practice of whipping pack of hounds into order for the pursuit —
so both the quality and reputation of MPs has declined, rendering them even less likely to behave independently.
This last connection is evident in the
analogy between the Riemann hypothesis, which describes a relationship between prime numbers, and the
so - called Weil conjectures, which were proposed
by mathematician André Weil in 1949 — the subject of Deligne's most famous result.
By analogy, the scientists sought to fix RNA in place in the cell, make a tiny ball with many matching DNA replicas of each RNA, then adapt next - gen DNA sequencing
so it worked in fixed cells.
So, I correct this
by using an
analogy I learned from Pavel Tsatsouline when I first learned how to peform kettlebell swings.
Thank you
so much for stopping
by sweet friend, and I'm
so glad you liked my nail polish
analogy... I'm usually in that state where I just need to take it off too;) Happy weekend cutie!!
To continue our
analogy then, the three oats in the dark might be the shares of stable, low - volatility businesses currently
so beloved
by the market — leaving the five oats, which you just knew were going to be value stocks, completely out in the cold.
An
analogy I have seen on a NOAA (or it might have been NASA) website is that it's a bit like a small candle in a very large room: the candle is certainly hot, but the size of the flame is
so small any heating effect in the room is overwhelmed
by the other factors affecting the system.
But
so are the
analogies, including the shockingly irresponsible conspiracy - theorizing petition - mongering
by people with irrelevant doctorates (and the odd head of state) at great public health risk to the world in general and much of Africa in particular.
Let's face it, many of us are going to have bleeding hands filling sandbags
by flooding rivers, and that * won't * be an
analogy,
so we might as well get started.
This is a bit off topic, but regarding Stevo's 03/09/08 11:28 AM post: Gravitation IS limited
by the speed of light, and the solar system doesn't fly apart,
so your
analogy was somewhat off.
So for you to be supplying material so readily turned absurd by even so grave a commentator as myself merely reinforces how absurdly wrong your analogies ar
So for you to be supplying material
so readily turned absurd by even so grave a commentator as myself merely reinforces how absurdly wrong your analogies ar
so readily turned absurd
by even
so grave a commentator as myself merely reinforces how absurdly wrong your analogies ar
so grave a commentator as myself merely reinforces how absurdly wrong your
analogies are.
In doing
so, he addresses a concern raised
by offset doubters, contextualizing it with a Middle Ages
analogy.
By analogy what Vaughan Pratt is trying
so hard to tell us non-believers is, Look, look, the witch didn't float
so she must» a not been a witch.
Isn't the
analogy closer to a house with a furnace heating full blast (the sun,
so also inexhaustible uninterruptible energy on the timescale in question) and a thermostat that works
by opening and closing the windows and doors?
* S: (n)
analogy (an inference that if things agree in some respects they probably agree in others) * S: (n)
analogy (drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect) «the operation of a computer presents and interesting
analogy to the working of the brain»; «the models show
by analogy how matter is built up» * S: (n) doctrine of
analogy,
analogy (the religious belief that between creature and creator no similarity can be found
so great but that the dissimilarity is always greater; language can point in the right direction but any
analogy between God and humans will always be inadequate)»
«The use of
analogy by an opponent in a debate is the first sign that you are dealing with a twit — even more
so when the debate is of a scientific or technical nature.
A blanket does not allow convection, whereas a planetary atmosphere does,
so whichever
analogy is used it is rendered inadequate
by the processes involved in convection.
On the
so - called «exonerations»
by official bodies Steve makes an easily understood topical
analogy:
OK,
so the Business and Media Institute is hardly likely to be a bastion of objective, detached journalism, and you are welcome to make your own minds about how low Kennedy was actually stooping with his
analogy,
by reading his piece for Vanity Fair on which the above report reports.
This paper
by Salzman et al. 2008 is a little technical in places, and a little out of date (now), but provides a nice insight into why we should care about Pliocene climate, and also discusses our understanding of matches and mismatches between the world of the mid-Pliocene and today, and
so why it is a useful
analogy for our future.