Sentences with phrase «so by your argument»

So by your argument, self - published authors should be the ones labeled as professionals.

So by that argument, the timber industry can say «killing 10,000 spotted owl is nothing, after all cats kill 100 million birds each and every year!»

Not exact matches

Quite apart from the argument over OSFI - style oversight, the former federal official and others stress this segment of the market at least requires more transparency and clearer data so regulators and the Bank of Canada can better understand the credit landscape and the extent of high - risk loans issued by private lenders.

Some of that happens to be news, but the Facebook argument is that it's all done by algorithm, so there's no real editorial activity.

The editor of the paper was so impressed by her arguments that he offered her a job.

When 2008 rolled around and then the European crisis started to properly kick off suddenly my arguments were not so outlandish and I was increasingly validated by events.

So these accusations are completely baseless and not backed by any arguments,» Peskov said.

So your argument is that because interest rates have been kept artificially low (effectively ripping everyone off with a manipulated money supply that's becoming more worthless by the day) that paying 6 % for a mortgage (which at one point was low) is getting ripped off?

«Canadians broadly believe in shifting towards cleaner sources of energy, because they are convinced doing so will benefit the planet, and are unconvinced by the argument that such a transition would gravely damage the economy.

With their large populations and rapid growth, these countries, so the argument goes, will soon become some of the largest economies in the world — and, in the case of China, the largest of all by as early as 2020.

While her arguments are plausible and the issue important enough to consider seriously, her critique of UNICEF seems strongly influenced by her own personal experience, and UNICEF does have good reason (given the number of not - so - legitimate international adoptions) to want to regulate international adoptions in the interest of children.

The online retail juggernaut Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) is flexing its muscles in the grocery market with breakthrough technologies that could wipe away competition by pinching margins and profitability and also could potentially leave many Americans stranded without a job, so the argument...

So where does the business ethics argument come from that it is indeed taxable by the state if it has no real value to the state?

We would actually dispute this conclusion, but decided to do so in a separate post (note: the report does not come out in favor of this conclusion either, it merely mentions the argument as one that is made by critics of bitcoin).

In order to respond to the «cash on the balance sheet» argument, I've subtracted out the amount of cash held by corporations, so the chart below includes market capitalization and net debt.

So the argument gets bolstered by the claim that inflation and interest rates are low, so P / E multiples ought to be higheSo the argument gets bolstered by the claim that inflation and interest rates are low, so P / E multiples ought to be higheso P / E multiples ought to be higher.

Just as the arguments for higher cost structures in other industries have been washed away by the internet tsunami (go ask retailers or content providers), so too will the arguments for premium pricing for institutional trades succumb to the inevitable erosion.

Late on Saturday afternoon, House Democrats surprised the country by releasing their rebuttal to the so - called Nunes memo — the document, prepared by Rep. Devin Nunes (R - CA), that has become a key part of the conservative argument that the FBI is biased against President Donald Trump.

Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.

And pretentious and frankly childish comments such as the one so ineloquently written by Brad really are counter to your argument, however futile it ultimately is.

kay, now since there is no gravity in space, by your argument god can't exist in space either, so that means he must be stuck down here with us as well > So, to use your logic, or lack thereofso that means he must be stuck down here with us as well > So, to use your logic, or lack thereofSo, to use your logic, or lack thereof::

So if one were to be convinced by Enlightenment arguments that Christianity is true, what would that say about the proper way to read the Bible?

Against this, Novak stubbornly and convincingly contends that the Founders got it right, that Smith got it right, that Tocqueville got it right, and we» who live in a moment in which their arguments have been so stunningly vindicated by history» can still get it right.

as with every other argument about christianity, if it really was only a belief it would be of no consequence, but unfortunately so many use their religious beliefs as an excuse to attempt to demand the rest of the population adhere to their beliefs by codifying them into civil law.

A Jesus that says «Argument by this X, so it is invalid».

Clearly there are some sites run by Christians so therefore their arguments are invalid?

As a participant in that 1998 Ramsey Colloquium, a longtime supporter of the cautious use of rights language, and a frequent critic of its misuses, I was moved by Reno's arguments to ponder whether the noble post — World War II universal human - rights idea has finally been so manipulated and politicized as to justify its abandonment by men and women of good will.

I'm sorry but you're not making an argument to counter his, you have no references or citations to back up such a claim and so you revert to attacking this man by calling him gay??? really, you think your the world authority on the bible when then you start casting stones left and right and attacking your fellow man?

You aren't obliged to adopt a horn of the dilemma, but you do so nonetheless by the manner in which you frame your argument.

When I suggested that he was grievously mistaken, he responded, as he had to Woodward's doubts about his stance on abortion, not so much by refuting the argument as by rebuffing the individual who had the gall to question his wisdom.

Even so, Schickel has been criticized in the past for abetting liberalism via relativism and lack of commitment, an argument he counters by appealing to the distinction between doctrine, which is permanent, and discipline (ritual, language, and arts), which changes with the times.

So the argument then seems to be cut social spending to stimulate the economy while claiming that the money cut from social spending will somehow end up back into welfare by donations from money they already claimed was being spent to buy «things» in helping stimulate our economy.

To understand why Behe's argument is so uncontested in the realm of fact, and yet why so many scientists find the concept of irreducible complexity not only difficult to accept but even impossible to consider, we should start by summarizing the modern understanding of Darwinism, as set out by Richard Dawkins.

As James expected the camping party to get back to the useful business of chopping firewood and cooking supper once he had «assuaged the dispute» by his pragmatic observations, so the application of process thinking in reference to the canonical wars now ravaging American higher education should be the means by which faculty might be led back from endless idle arguments to their real and proper work of designing good courses and teaching them well.

And it's questioning by one of the flock — so there can be no arguments that he doesn't know the scripture or the bible.

The speaker in the cartoon is assuming that if homsexuals are made so by environmental factors, then all humans must be born neutral and their sexuality, in either direction, is shaped by the environment; when in fact one could also argue (and I believe the argument actually is) that humans are born hetero by default and shifted to homosexuality be environmental factors.

we are a NATION of INDIviduaLS... if you have that mindset ruined by prayer... then it doesnot stop at prayer... so IM guessing your argument is not really honest... everyone is an individual... have you been to town council metings?

I understand the argument is straightforward, but it is: 1) based in definitional fiat (there is equally valid evidence to suggest that god is malevolent or simply apathetic); 2) actually embraces the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) attempts to constrain god by limiting god's possible range of choice.

And so the case for companionate marriage has been supplemented again and again by the argument that we must endorse reproductive technologies that eliminate any relevant difference between a male — female couple and a same - sex couple.

Paradoxically, in doing so, they often make universalistic arguments, but this is not the place to pursue the internal conflicts occasioned by their proposals.

Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that faith involves a free act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a justreason for changing or doubting that same faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).

Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that faith involves a free act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a just reason for changing or doubting that same faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).

Not convincing» which is funny circular argument because you state that everyone of that age «average education level of individuals is higher now than in the dark ages» so by your standard nothing of that age can be verified?

I've used that argument many times, but never knew it had been put so eloquently by someone.

Yet again I am so amused by the popular atheists who flock to articles like this to throw out words like «dumb» «stupid» «idiots» «morons» and then use same overused arguments proposed by authors such as Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.

So please, please, please do not promote religion by claiming that it maintains peace and stability - use other arguments.

Stern notes the argument that an overly aggressive legislative (and by implication, police) response to militias might risk increasing the militias» paranoia, but he dismisses it with the flat assertion that the militias are already so paranoid that their attitude simply can not get any worse.

So not only is your argument weak, so is the method you take for your arguing by the same standard that you judge religion to be falsSo not only is your argument weak, so is the method you take for your arguing by the same standard that you judge religion to be falsso is the method you take for your arguing by the same standard that you judge religion to be false.

«So long as an opinion is strongly rooted in the feelings,» John Stuart Mill observed, «it gains rather than loses in stability by having a preponderating weight of argument against it.

Mr. Ceaser is so impressed by the argument for veneration that FEDERALIST 49 appears on the license plate of one of his big cars.